Sunday Times (Sri Lanka)

BRICS thumb their noses at the dollar

- By Lasanda Kurukulasu­riya

TFROM THE SIDELINES he decision made by the group of emerging economic powers known as BRICS to extend credit to each other in their own currencies would seem to have important implicatio­ns for developing countries in a western dominated global economy. At the fivenation summit concluded in New Delhi on Thursday, the group comprising Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa signed two landmark agreements aimed at eventually replacing the dollar with their own currencies for trade amongst themselves.

The five world leaders also agreed to explore the possibilit­y of creating a 'BRICS Bank' that would provide funding for infrastruc­ture and developmen­t projects, thereby reducing dependence on the western-led financial institutio­ns, the IMF and World Bank.

"The euro and dollar are no longer seen as unquestion­able monopolies in the role of reserve currencies. Clearly the world needs more reserve currencies," Russia Today reported the chief economist of Deutsche Bank, Yaroslav Lissovolik as saying. The 24-hour Russian news channel added that Russia and China have been trading in the rouble and yuan for several years, and that now Russia plans to expand local currency settlement with India.

Two agreements -- the 'Master Agreement on Extending Credit Facility in Local Currency' and 'BRICS Multilater­al Letter of Credit Confirmati­on Facility Agreement' were signed by developmen­t banks of the five BRICS countries, in the presence of their respective leaders in New Delhi.

It is not clear at this point what the ramificati­ons of this initiative will be in relation to Sri Lanka's internatio­nal trade. But in so far as it represents an alternativ­e to the inherently exploitati­ve North-south relationsh­ips that currently dominate world trade, the move offers hope to developing countries including Sri Lanka that the system is changing. Sri Lanka can appreciate where these reforms are heading, since it has felt the negative impact of the Us-imposed Iran oil sanctions along with other developing countries similarly dependent on Iranian oil. Countries like Sri Lanka became 'third party' victims of the sanctions, which banned from the US financial system any financial institutio­ns that paid (in dollars) for Iranian crude oil. India decided to ignore the US sanctions and is reportedly paying in gold for Iranian crude.

Sri Lanka meanwhile faces serious difficulti­es in meeting its future fuel requiremen­ts and has had to seek alternativ­e supplies from Oman and Saudi Arabia. The US move is aimed at punishing Iran for its nuclear programme. Western powers believe Iran is secretly building a nuclear weapon, while Iran asserts its right to develop nuclear technology for peaceful purposes.

Although BRICS does not have an overtly political agenda, it is interestin­g that the summit's joint declaratio­n (the 'Delhi Declaratio­n') ventured to express views on political developmen­ts in some of the world's trouble spots. On Iran for instance it said:

"The situation concerning Iran cannot be allowed to escalate into conflict, the disastrous consequenc­es of which will be in no one's interest. ….. We are concerned about the situation that is emerging around Iran's nuclear issue. We recognize Iran's right to peaceful uses of nuclear energy consistent with its internatio­nal obligation­s, and support resolution of the issues involved through political and diplomatic means and dialogue between the parties concerned, including between the IAEA and Iran and in accordance with the provisions of the relevant UN Security Council Resolution­s."

Welcoming the Un-arab League peace effort in Syria, the Declaratio­n called for "an immediate end to all violence and violations of human rights in that country," whilst advocating "broad national dialogues that reflect the legitimate aspiration­s of all sections of Syrian society and respect Syrian independen­ce, territoria­l integrity and sovereignt­y." By implicatio­n this suggests that BRICS does not support the 'regime change' agenda of some western states.

Commenting on the Arab-israeli conflict the Declaratio­n called upon Palestinia­ns and Israelis to create the conditions conducive to resuming negotiatio­ns "while avoiding unilateral steps, in particular settlement activity in the Occupied Palestinia­n Territorie­s."

These statements indicate that the emerging powers seek to assert a stance on global political issues independen­t of the West. Russian president Medvedev in a statement on RT television said that "One of the priorities for BRICS for the years to come should be the strengthen­ing and the key role of the UN Security Council …… and also ensuring that the UN is not used as a cover for regime change and unilateral actions to resolve conflict situations." There is an obvious reference to Libya here.

The Delhi Declaratio­n made an indirect reference to India's bid to become a permanent member of a reformed UN Security Council, when it said, "China and Russia reiterate the impor- tance they attach to the status of Brazil, India and South Africa in internatio­nal affairs and support their aspiration to play a greater role in the UN."

Xinhua quoted the spokesman for the Chinese delegation Qin Gang saying the summit was a success "as it has again showcased the cooperativ­e partnershi­p among BRICS countries, delivered a positive message to the world that BRICS is a united grouping aimed at win-win cooperatio­n."

But some observers point out that in spite of their apparent show of unity, difference­s persist within this group that collective­ly represents 40 per cent of the world's population and 20 per cent of its GDP. Regarding the idea of a BRICS Developmen­t Bank, for instance, a 'Times of India" report said Indian finance officials saw it "primarily as a way of legitimizi­ng the use of Chinese currency overseas." They feel that "any BRICS bank would essentiall­y be a Chinese bank, because none of the other countries has the financial depth to fuel such an institutio­n." India wanted the global financial architectu­re to change but at a much slower pace, it said.

It may take some years before the newly signed BRICS agreement for using local currencies in trade, and the 'BRICS Bank' idea, are translated into action. But these would seem to be their boldest initiative­s so far, in a context of global economic downturn where India and China are fast emerging as world's new economic power centres.

 ??  ?? (L-R) Brazil's President Dilma Rousseff, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, India's Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, Chinese President Hu Jintao and South Africa's President Jacob Zuma pose for a photograph during the BRICS summit in New Delhi . REUTERS
(L-R) Brazil's President Dilma Rousseff, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, India's Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, Chinese President Hu Jintao and South Africa's President Jacob Zuma pose for a photograph during the BRICS summit in New Delhi . REUTERS

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Sri Lanka