Sunday Times (Sri Lanka)

Despite RTE, schools remain out of reach

-

Despite a lot of fuss and noise, the Right to Education (RTE) Act mandate of private schools reserving 25 per cent of their seats at the entry level for students belonging to disadvanta­ged sections, is yet to take off meaningful­ly in Chennai.

Some schools say they already admit “poor children”. Others claim no one came enquiring. Despite a lot of fuss and noise, the Right to Education (RTE) Act mandate of private schools reserving 25 per cent of their seats at the entry level for students belonging to disadvanta­ged sections, is yet to take off meaningful­ly in Chennai.

First, those parents who need to know about the clause have not been told very much about it. Many, including a section of highly respected educationi­sts, spent a lot of time and effort emphasisin­g that this clause ought to be implemente­d, with their rationale often assuming a tone that sought to cajole the middle class. Their arguments told middle class parents that this RTE Act clause brought with it certain pedagogic benefits for their children. Children from disadvanta­ged sections were even made out to be an exotic addition to posh classrooms, as they brought with them unique ‘cultural riches’ that were likely to add value to the educationa­l experience of their counterpar­ts from privileged background­s.

But, the government did little to create awareness of this clause among those sections that need to know. Many from disadvanta­ged and economical­ly weaker sections, who might qualify for admission to private schools now, still do not know of such a provision. A few parents, who got to know from their employers or through NGOs, and made an attempt, are not motivated to pursue it after some schools told them that there were no vacancies. Sounding pessimisti­c, a parent told me: “These schools will not let people like us in.”

Second, the State government’s rules drafted to implement the Act effectivel­y allow for a certain dilution of this clause. As per Tamil Nadu’s rules for implementa­tion of the Act, a child whose parent or guardian’s annual income is less But, the government did little to create awareness of this clause among those sections that need to know. Many from disadvanta­ged and economical­ly weaker sections, who might qualify for admission to private schools now, still do not know of such a provision.

A few parents, who got to know from their employers or through NGOs, and made an attempt, are not motivated to pursue it after some schools told them that there were no vacancies. Sounding pessimisti­c, a parent told me: “These schools will not let

people like us in.” than Rs. 2 lakh can be admitted under the category ‘ weaker section’. The ‘ disadvanta­ged group’ comprises students belonging to SC, ST, BC, MBC categories, children living with HIV/ AIDS, children with disabiliti­es, children of scavengers and those of belonging to the transgende­r community.

The RTE Act speaks of ‘children belonging to weaker section and disadvanta­ged group in the neighbourh­ood’, Tamil Nadu’s rules seem to have interprete­d it as ‘weaker section or disadvanta­ged group’, signalling that private schools could admit students from either of the categories. And some schools are doing exactly that – simply admitting students from ‘disadvanta­ged groups’. These children, unlike those who qualify under the ‘economical­ly weaker section’ category, do not get a fee reimbursem­ent from the government and have to pay the fee like all other children. In effect, education will still be out of reach for those children whom this clause sought to include.

Third, the ambiguity around the concept of a neighbourh­ood school continues. The head of a CBSE school observed that her school was not obliged to admit children from economical­ly weaker or disadvanta­ged sections if there was a government or a local body school in the neighbourh­ood. But, she did not have an answer to the question “Who checks if there is a school?” A recent Madras High Court Order also points to this, in which Justice K. Chandru observed that the RTE Act was not clear as to what constitute­s a neighbourh­ood school. Another school head has a few vacant seats reserved, but does not know how long she should keep them, in the absence of any applicatio­n.

The school education department has to clarify these points, if it is committed to taking the Act beyond the stage of issuing GOs and drafting rules.-thehindu.com

A boy watches his peers at play, from outside a school.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Sri Lanka