Sunday Times (Sri Lanka)

How UK ordered Mau Mau files to be destroyed

Material which could 'embarrass Her Majesty's Government' was burnt; Others were thrown into rivers or discreetly flown back to Whitehall

- By Claire Ellicott

Secret documents released on Friday reveal the full extent to which Whitehall systematic­ally destroyed files relating to colonial crimes committed in the final years of the British empire.

Files published by the National Archives at Kew tell how administra­tion staff in Kenya, Uganda and Malaya 'cleansed' so-called dirty documents.

Material which could 'embarrass Her Majesty's Government' was burnt, dumped in rivers or discreet- ly flown to Britain to stop it falling into the hands of postindepe­ndence regimes.

Friday's declassifi­ed documents are the eighth and final batch of 8,800 files from 37 former colonies held in a secret Foreign Office archive at Hanslope Park, Buckingham­shire. They should have been made available to the public, but were kept hidden.

The existence of the archive only emerged last year, when a group of Kenyans who were detained and tortured during the Mau Mau rebellion in the 1950s sued the British government, which finally agreed to release the files.

The latest batch contains scant detail of any atrocities committed - implying that the majority of the damning papers have been destroyed.

Among them are thought to be records of the torture and murder of Mau Mau insurgents detained by British colonial authoritie­s, the alleged massacre of 24 unarmed villagers in Malaya by soldiers of the Scots Guards in 1948 and sensitive documents kept by colonial authoritie­s in Aden, where the army's Intelligen­ce Corps operated a secret torture cen- tre in the 1960s.

The destructio­n of this material was a huge undertakin­g, and in Uganda was codenamed Operation Legacy. The documents make reference to 'clean' and 'dirty' files - presumably a reference to the informatio­n included in them.

Officials were told that 'emphasis is placed upon destructio­n', and no trace of either the documents or their incinerati­on should remain.

Colonial officials in Kenya were told: 'It is permissibl­e, as an alternativ­e to destructio­n by fire, for documents to be packed in weighted crates and dumped in very deep and current-free water at maximum practicabl­e distance from the coast.'

And in Uganda, an official effectivel­y excluded anyone who was not white from being involved in the destructio­n of certain documents. He wrote: 'Steps are being taken to ensure that such papers are only seen and handled by Civil Service Officers who are British subjects of European descent.'

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Sri Lanka