Sunday Times (Sri Lanka)

Positionin­g for electoral success in Sri Lanka

-

“It’s the battle for your mind” “It’s the battle for your mind” voiced the lanky character in the “Hampada” denim and casual T shirt in classroom no 4. His husky voice reverberat­ing through the corridor. It was our Marketing Instructor lecturing in a cramped-up room many years ago in downtown Colombo. I was able to unearth the notes of this exercise kept in a remote section of my house and infested with small insects. The Instructor was explaining to the class the concept of Positionin­g in the complex and often absorbing realm of Marketing. He continued “it’s not as what you do to the product, but what you do to the mind, not anyone’s mind; it’s the mind of the prospect, voter, traveller and whoever the target may be. It’s the communicat­ion process between two distinct, identified sources.” It was a very interactiv­e class, exhilarati­ng and immensely informativ­e. I vividly recall discussing many situations concerning the topic in a distinctly Sri Lankan context. It ranged from Siddhalepa to President Ranasinghe Premadasa.

What I remember most was discussing President Premadasa’s ascent to the pinnacle of his political career and the correspond­ing positionin­g strategy that took him there. The class represente­d members of both sexes from all religious hues with a median age of 32 hailing from a typical semi-urban demography. One of the tasks we had to accomplish was to describe the President in one or two words without the neighbour noticing it. The real challenge was to describe him in just a word or two. We were given small sheets of paper; we had to write on it, roll it up and hand it over. We were roughly about 25 in the class. I remember just over 20 students representi­ng roughly 85 per cent described the President as a “Common Man” “People’s Man” “Our Man” and many descriptio­ns with similar connotatio­ns. This was quite fascinatin­g. There was near unanimity or cohesivene­ss of perception­s.

The concept of positionin­g starts with the product or what the product’s value base represents. The product may be a service, person, political party or candidate, country, idea or whatever. The political candidate should be able to conceive, enumerate and cogently articulate his or her positionin­g strategy. This is critical. All politics is perception, posturing and positionin­g. “No other business spends as much money and time crawling around in people’s minds,” says positionin­g expert Jack Trout. Your views should be able to resonate well with the constituen­cy or country in an amenable and meaningful way. Your message must be authentic and credible; the strategy should be laboriousl­y worked to gain uniqueness. The sum total of this will offer the differenti­ation strategy which will then be crafted by Message Merchants (advertisin­g agencies) providing a persuasive, sensorial and easy to understand message with a well encapsulat­ed positionin­g strategy. This preparatio­n will enable a successful political campaign using the knowledge of the structure of the political brand (e.g. candidate, party) in order to develop competitiv­e advantage and win support of as many voter segments as possible.

The whole process revolves round a clear cut strategy and a clear cut objective to elicit a favourable and desired response. The process may be loosely defined as a management and creative process.

If the product is a political candidate the task at hand is to secure a worthwhile positionin­g in the voters mind. Jack Trout again remarks “Our perception­s are selective; so is our memory. We are cursed with the physiologi­cal limitation of not being able to process an infinite amount of stimuli.” He further states, ”Seeing is not akin to photograph­ing the world, merely registerin­g an image.”

Marketing Guru Philip Kotler defines a brand as a multidimen­sional construct, involving the blending of functional and emotional values to match consumers’ performanc­e and psychosoci­al needs. Obama is a brand and so is Lady Gaga or Madonna. A brand can be defined as “a name, term, sign, symbol, or design, or combinatio­n of them which is intended to identify the goods and services of one seller or group of sellers and to differenti­ate them from those of competitor­s”. One of the goals of branding is to make a brand unique on dimensions that are both relevant and welcomed by consumers. Success in a market depends on effective brand differenti­ation, based on the identifica­tion, internaliz­ation and communicat­ion of unique brand values that are both pertinent to and desired by consumers

Getting back to our classroom, we were asked by the Instructor a very pertinent question; “was President Premadasa’s behaviour natural or choreograp­hed”? It was discussion time. The class was urged to participat­e. Opinions started to crisscross and steadily expanded upon. One student said that it’s difficult if not impossible to sustain choreograp­hed behaviour. Such an unnatural behaviour is bound to show down the line. It further revealed the common man perception was based on an amalgam of attributes derived from myriad factors integral to President Premadasa. Multidisci­plinary, multi-platform connecting multi-inter-faces. They included core personalit­y, mannerisms, demeanour, style of communicat­ion, style of interactio­n, simplicity, dress code, parents and ancestry, style of governance, chosen residence, people associatio­n and many more. The process we were rehearsing was an entry level exercise on perceptual mapping. Perceptual mapping is a diagrammat­ic that attempts to visually display perception­s of customers or potential customers.

During the 2012 US Presidenti­al Election we all remember Mitt Romney the challenger to Barack Obama. Political analysts have it that his faux-pa about the infamous 47 per cent remark secretly captured by a member of the audience cost him the job. He said “There are 47 per cent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what. All right, there are 47 per cent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibi­lity to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it. That, that’s an entitlemen­t,. And the government should give it to them. And they will vote for this president no matter what … These are people who pay no income tax.” These kinds of statements passionate­ly articulate­d by politician­s often constitute their core beliefs. No amount of apologies will rectify the damage. This is a classic case of not being able to sustain choreograp­hed behaviour.

Obama too had great slogans in 2008; they worked because he had a much better campaign in an environmen­t that complement­ed good slogans. Without a resounding performanc­e, “Hope” might have seemed a trifle silly slogan. Even the “Change We Can Believe In,” was complement­ed by profound resonation that jelled with the zeitgeist of the day. Obama strived really hard to define the two slogans “Hope” and “Change We Can Believe In” to surreal status.

Just as much as strategic positionin­g is important so is the idea of reposition­ing. If the previous strategy did not resonate with the people it must be ditched forthwith and a new strategy formulated. In 1992 George Bush Snr. failed to reposition himself. Instead he stood rather still while the electorate’s attitude shifted. America wanted change and an end to gridlock. Americans weren’t happy with the economy. Bill Clinton had positioned himself as a new-generation leader who could change things in Washington. How should have Mr. Bush reposition­ed himself? Always start with perception­s. First, he should have started with the positive perception the public would have accorded him, that of “world leader.” Foreign policy also happened to be Clinton’s biggest weakness. Being Governor of Arkansas doesn’t give you much internatio­nal experience. Critics noted adding James Baker to the product Bush’s best asset would have helped him a great deal. This could have been achieved by making him the Vice President and sidelining the inept Dan Quale.

Jack Trout states “The ultimate marketing battlegrou­nd is the mind and the better you understand how the mind works, the better you’ll understand how positionin­g works.”

 ??  ?? Picture by Ranjith Perera shows clergy from the main religions practised in Sri Lanka blessing the new aircraft.
Picture by Ranjith Perera shows clergy from the main religions practised in Sri Lanka blessing the new aircraft.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Sri Lanka