Sunday Times (Sri Lanka)

Jayalalith­aa whips up Kachchativ­u issue; sidelines Tamil Nadu's problems

- From Kumar Chellappan Our Chennai Correspond­ent

For the first time in Tamil Nadu history, an incumbent Chief Minister has come down heavily on the Centre, describing an external affairs action as "unconstitu­tional".

Chief Minister Jeyaram Jayalalith­aa has written to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, alleging the 1974 transfer of Kachchativ­u to Sri Lanka an unconstitu­tional act. Strangely enough, post-2016 TN assembly election, the Kachchativ­u issue continues to hog the limelight in State politics. At no point in time has Kachchativ­u received so much prominence in TN. Even when the uninhabite­d islet was transferre­d to Sri Lanka by the Indira Gandhi-led government in 1974, TN political parties were silent. A reference of the newspapers, on the issue, shows the topic did not get any space, as politician­s then, had much more serious things to occupy themselves with.

The first session of the new TN legislativ­e assembly saw the 1974 Kachchativ­u accord, become the main topic of discussion. The almost week-long session saw the islet getting more prominence than the day-to-day problems faced by the TN people. More than a discussion of any significan­ce, it was a slanging match between the ruling AIADMK and the opposition DMK. While CM Jayalalith­aa accused DMK supremo Muthuvel Karunanidh­i for not doing anything to protect the interests of the fishermen vis-à-vis the islet (Karunanidh­i was the CM when the accord was signed), the latter issued statements justifying his actions. Karunanidh­i will not come to the House because both leaders do not see eye-to-eye for all practical purposes.

There were no major discussion­s in the assembly about the steps initiated by the government to face future deluges like the one which Chennai and surroundin­g areas witnessed in December 2015. It was the failure of the Chennai Municipal Corporatio­n to ensure the maintenanc­e of the storm water drainage within the metropolis, which ravaged the city for almost a fortnight, because of the unpreceden­ted heavy rains. One cannot rule out the possibilit­y of such rains as the Indian monsoon continues to be as unpredicta­ble as ever.

Even as the TN assembly was discussing the Kachchativ­u issue last week, the Madras High Court dismissed yet another petition filed by a Tamil chauvinist in Chennai, pleading the court to issue directives to the Centre, asking it to protect and ensure the fishing rights of TN fishermen in the islet. The court was harsh in its verdict, that the issue came under the jurisdicti­on of the Central Government at New Delhi, and it was not for the Court to issue such policy directives. With this, all the litigation­s filed in TN courts on the Kachchativ­u issue have come to a close.

Navigation and mercantile law experts are unanimous in their view that Kachchativ­u is a settled issue, with no scope of opening same for future discussion­s. Veteran Captain of the Indian Navy and an authority on the Indian Ocean and Bay of Bengal, Hariharan Balakrishn­an said the subject was not worth discussing. “It is a foreign policy decision by the Government of India. States do not have any say in such matters,” said Captain Balakrishn­an, pointing out that government­s in India and Bangladesh resolved the 162 enclaves spread across both countries. There were 111 Indian enclaves inside Bangladesh (population: 37,000), while there were 51 Bangladesh enclaves inside India (population:14,000). On August 1, 2015, both countries signed an agreement granting these people citizenshi­p of their choice, and the issue which has been haunting since 1947 was resolved amicably. The West Bengal government led by Mamata Banerjee, fully cooperated with the Centre, as she knew it was an internatio­nal issue which has to be handled by New Delhi.

It took almost 25 years for a TN politician to rake up the Kachchativ­u issue. Jayalalith­aa approached the Supreme Court in 2008, challengin­g the constituti­onality and legality of the 1974 accord signed between India and Sri Lanka. Even then, Karunanidh­i, her bête noir, maintained his silence over the issue. Things of the past prove that TN politician­s rake up the Tamil ethnic issue, as well as the fishermen's problem when they do not have any work to do.

Following his party’s debacle in the 2011 assembly election, Karunanidh­i revived Tamil Eelam Supporters Organisati­on (TESO) in 2012. He last attended a TESO meeting in 1986 and has not answered queries about what happened to the outfit since then. By 2011 he was out of work, as his party had been decimated in the assembly election, and the Grand Ole Man of TN politics was on the lookout for some kind of engagement, to be in the media limelight.

Early this week, CM Jayalalith­aa, in a letter to PM Narendra Modi (that’s the only work she does routinely, whenever TN fishermen trespass the Sri Lankan side of the Internatio­nal Maritime Boundary Line, and get arrested, she sends a letter to the PM, blaming the island nation and its Navy for their “highhanded attitude”), declared the transfer of Kachchativ­u to Sri Lanka was unconstitu­tional. CM Jayalalith­aa releases excerpts of the letters she writes to the PM, to the media, while remaining silent about the replies she has received to date.

The “concern” shown by TN politician­s towards the Tamils in Sri Lanka is fake and bogus. Need proof? Wait till next week.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Sri Lanka