Sunday Times (Sri Lanka)

Bagful of aches and pains for Lanka's schoolchil­dren

Paediatric­ians call for review of curricula to ease the burden on young students

- By Kumudini Hettiarach­chi The physical impacts are: The psychologi­cal impacts are: The economic impacts are: This is why the SLCP is strongly urging the government to: The SLCP is requesting the education authoritie­s to;

Child Specialist­s downed their stethoscop­es, not as a work-torule protest, but to take up bags and books for ‘examinatio­n’. Moving away from medical bags and tomes, they are peering closely at schoolbags and textbooks, analysing and trying to find out what ills are being caused to schoolchil­dren.

The stress faced by ‘voiceless’ schoolchil­dren has now been taken up by none other than the powerful Sri Lanka College of Paediatric­ians (SLCP).

The SLCP which looks after the physical and mental health of children is focusing its attention on schoolchil­dren overburden­ed by an education system which over the years has piled on more details to the curricula, excessivel­y taxing young minds without taking into considerat­ion the leaps and bounds in the advancemen­t of technology.

This is as a part of the SLCP’s ‘School Education Project’ and at the helm are SLCP President Dr. Ramya de Silva and Immediate Past President, Prof. Sujeewa Amarasena.

Under this project, the SLCP has studied different aspects of school education and the inescapabl­e trap that children are caught in from the tender age of 5+ when they walk into the Grade 1 classroom until 19+ when they walk out from Grade 13 (Advanced Level) as young men and women.

As a first step, the SLCP has picked up the schoolbag and to its horror found that -- once it is filled with numerous textbooks the child has to take each and every day of the school week, along with other stuff needed for project work and the bottle of water and tiffin box -- it is unbearably heavy.

“The Sri Lankan education system – is it what is best for them?” asks not only a mover and shaker behind the project but also mother of two, Consultant Paediatric Neurologis­t Dr. Jithangi Wanigasing­he, who sees many children struggling to don the heavy bags onto their shoulders and then walking into school bent double like beasts of burden.

She explains that there is serious concern “about the massive content in textbooks” which is in turn having a physical and psychologi­cal impact on children, while the economic impact is felt by the child’s family and also the country. The ergonomica­lly unsafe weight of the schoolbag due to the heavy load of books has resulted in a change in the carriage of children. There have been musculo-skeletal impacts such as shoulder and lower back pain, knee pain and also spinal deformitie­s. The heavy workload has resulted in children not having much time outdoors both at school and home causing them to be overweight and obese. A study in the Colombo metropolit­an area has found that about 15% of 8 to 12-year-olds are overweight. With extra coaching essential to cope with the massive content, the child has no time to rest, relax or play – being dragged after school from one tuition class to another. Difficulty in understand­ing the subject matter as it is too much and too complex. Stress of competitiv­e examinatio­ns. Pressure to always do more. A majority of children in Year 13 are no longer in school, with their learning entirely tuition-based. In the race to become the best, some children who are physically challenged or slow learners are left behind and marginalis­ed. It is no longer entirely free education, due to tuition. The education system (assessment­s) is geared for limited, selected jobs. It is an education system which encourages memorising instead of applicatio­n and honing of thinking ability. Rote learning blunts the child’s creativity and innovative skills. Dr. Wanigasing­he has dissected the subjects and the time allocation­s for each subject and cites just one of numerous examples – Science in Grade 7 which has 17 topics spread over 250 pages in two large textbooks. The average number of Science periods per week = 5 The number of weeks available per year = 32 The total number of periods to cover this content = 160 periods (106 hours) However, with the content being large, the child needs tuition to understand this subject, while a vast load is earmarked as homework which affects the child’s play time. She reminds the Sunday Times that these children do not have only Science to study. The total number of subjects for a child in any Grade from 6 to 9 is a minimum of 13.

With echoes of the plaintive cry of thousands of children across the country being: “We don’t like to study… we want to play”, why are we dragging our feet, is Dr. Ramya de Silva’s plea.

“Play is an essential component for both the physical and mental wellbeing of the child,” she adds.

The time to act and change the curricula is now. Re-evaluate the content of subjects. Simplify the textbooks. Identify the core knowledge required and at what level and age to deliver this core knowledge. Invest in improving the reading skills of students. Invest on creativity and innovative thinking – revamp the subject of Practical & Technical Skills (PTS). Promote better mental health through a “less stress education”. Introduce play into the time-table – increase the interval by 10 minutes. Make the Grade 5 Scholarshi­p Examinatio­n non-compulsory. Before the content is increased – ensure that teachers have the capacity to teach this content. Reduce the burden of assessment­s in such subjects as PTS and Civics, while retaining the content that is vital and teaching such content in a more enjoyable and applicable manner. Reiteratin­g that the content is too much and too repetitive, Consultant Paediatric Neurologis­t Dr. Jithangi Wanigasing­he picks up the Grade 6 Civics textbook, asking whether a 10-year- old can understand the concepts described in it.

Earlier, a lesson meant for a 13-year- old student of Grade 9 under the old syllabus of 2015 has now been included for an 11-year- old in Grade 7 under the new syllabus of 2016. “Why, oh why,” is her query.

In agreement with his colleagues of the SLCP, Prof. Sujeewa Amarasena details the ‘expected outcomes’ of the ideal school education system as: Being able to produce a student who is creative, challengin­g, innovative and problem- solving which matches the economic needs of the country; facilitati­ng education in a stress-free (or minimal stress), happy and comfortabl­e frame-work; providing educationa­l opportunit­ies universall­y and equitably to all children; and placing emphasis on matching skills/abilities of students rather than focusing only on the Z- score.

Play is an essential component for both the physical and mental wellbeing of the child

Review the current system using the expertise of both local and foreign educationi­sts. Garner the input of different stakeholde­rs/ profession­als which should include teachers, parents, paediatric­ians, psychiatri­sts, psychologi­sts, economists, community leaders and students, making it a team effort to improve the lot of the Sri Lankan child. Carry out educationa­l reforms in stages and not load the children with reforms en masse. Target an education system which facilitate­s “liking to learn”.

 ??  ?? Pic by Indika Handuwala
Pic by Indika Handuwala

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Sri Lanka