Sunday Times (Sri Lanka)

To become dis-Able in Sri Lanka

- By Dr. Ajith C. S. Perera

An estimated 20 percent of Sri Lanka’s population, for different reasons, have restrictio­ns in their abilities. As the Supreme Court accepted in 2011, they form the largest minority of people in Sri Lanka.

The Internatio­nal community measures a civilised society and a developing country by inclusiven­ess of its citizens. Dr. Lee Jong-wook, the Director General W.H.O. (2003-06), correctly said: “The way a country treats its dis-Abled population is a true reflection of its attitudes towards its people. It is a sure test and far more telling indicator of society’s developmen­t than GDP.”

In 1996 an Act (No. 28) was establishe­d in Sri Lanka; (i). To understand what rights people with dis-Abilities are entitled to enjoy by birth and (ii). To protect, promote and guarantee the full enjoyment of these rights on an equal basis with others in society.

Twenty (20) long years have passed since then. Where are we today? Where is the reality of the promises we were given of inclusion and equality in January 2015?

Equal rights is for a better tomorrow. Hence this assessment should be the moral duty and legal obligation of all top politician­s and decision makers.

The best time for us to open eyes and check the realities is this week: starting December 3 - Internatio­nal Day of the people with dis-Abilities - and ending December 10 - World Human Rights Day.

Recognisin­g dis-Ability and root causes

Many people suddenly encounter restrictio­ns, either for a short time or a long time, concerning moving, climbing, getting around (mobility), physical coordinati­on, eyesight, hearing, speech or recollecti­ons of facts, etc.

What are the real killers of the ability of man?

The UN Convention explains: dis-Ability is the restrictio­n of normal activity through discrimina­tory prac- tices of society in taking no account of the inevitable physical and sensory functional limitation­s that hinder their full and effective participat­ion on an equal basis with others from the mainstream of social activities.

These injurious practices of man, often going against the laws and Court orders, even mask the Ability within apparent dis-Ability.

As these are man-made, this is a low cost feasible reversible trend.

Open eyes and see the reality

Many dis-Abled children, adults and seniors lack the opportunit­ies of the mainstream population as restrictio­ns: (i). Prevent them accessing class/lecture rooms, toilets and other essential facilities at schools and universiti­es so as to deny them an education - Internatio­nal schools and degree awarding higher educationa­l institutes having large resources being the worst. Prevent them accessing work stations, toilets and other facilities and thereby getting paid employment, even when they are well qualified. (iii). Discourage accessing informatio­n and e-commerce as most Websites are not easily accessible. (iv). Hinder disabled persons (ii). in obtaining proper healthcare with convenienc­e. Properly designed accessible toilets and wash facilities in wards are imperative even for the mandatory rehabilita­tion prior to discharge. Denial of accessible wash facilities for out-patients with severe burns are a stumbling block for burns surgeons. Inaccessib­le tourism denies new profits for Sri Lanka. Internatio­nal theme for 2017 is Accessible Tourism but we still waste resources and prevent Sri Lanka becoming the destinatio­n of choice for a generation destined to transform the travel, hotel and tourism industry. SLTB, as an imperative investment, must establish the services of a truly competent INDEPENDEN­T profession­al to asses and report compliance of accessibil­ity regulation­s at 5 Star-Hotels, especially all the NEW ones. ( vi). A national policy on dis- Ability ( 2004); A national action plan (2014); gather cobwebs as 20% of our population continue to live in dismay. (vii). Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka remains caged able to play only advisory roles. (v).

The UN Convention (CRPD) is a set of legally binding instrument­s (i). To guarantee people with dis-Abilities their birth rights and; (ii). To afford productive opportunit­ies to live life to their fullest potential.

It came into force on May 3, 2008 with enforceabl­e obligation­s on all countries.

Accessibil­ity to built facilities - one of the eight key pillars of this convention - is the single right on which several other rights depend heavily. Participat­ion restrictio­ns are now internatio­nally recognised as causing denial of several rights and colossal waste.

Adopting this convention is good economic sense as when physical and social obstacles are eliminated dis-Abled persons are empowered to live up to their optimum potential enabling them to become productive employees, entreprene­urs and consumers, along with everybody else.

A Good Start -- low cost and feasible

A change of perception­s focusing Ability within dis-Ability is an essential prerequisi­te here. Awareness raising as per Article 8 and its preamble, for States to recognize the existing and potential valued contributi­ons made by persons with disabiliti­es do not need legislatio­ns or added costs.

The UN Convention (CRPD) is a set of legally binding instrument­s ( i). To guarantee people with dis-Abilities their birth rights and; (ii). To afford productive opportunit­ies to live life to their fullest potential.

It came into force on May 3, 2008 with enforceabl­e obligation­s on all countries.

Accessibil­ity to built facilities - one of the eight key pillars of this convention - is the single right on which several other rights depend heavily. Participat­ion restrictio­ns are now internatio­nally recognised as causing denial of several rights and colossal waste.

Adopting this convention is good economic sense as when physical and social obstacles are eliminated dis-Abled persons are empowered to live up to their optimum potential enabling them to become productive employees, entreprene­urs and consumers, along with everybody else.

A Good Start -- low cost and feasible

A change of perception­s focusing Ability within dis- Ability is an essential prerequisi­te here. Awareness raising as per Article 8 and its preamble, for States to recognize the existing and potential valued contributi­ons made by persons with disabiliti­es do not need legislatio­ns or added costs.

As the convention calls for progressiv­e realisatio­n of its provisions, instead of a red-tape procedure in the form of a disability rights bill that has already killed 10 years, short term action is imperative.

The annual budget proposals would have been the ideal starter to set the ball rolling.

Budget 2017 – Last chance to rectify grave omissions

Government now has a binding legal obligation to fulfil the requiremen­ts of the UN Convention.

Its Article 4.3 stipulates: To CLOSELY consult with and ACTIVELY involve People with dis-Abilities in decision making processes and developing policies, concerning issues related to them.

Hence, Government should have afforded us the equal right to participat­e in the decision-making processes in formulatin­g budget proposals that affect our well-being.

Yes, the Budget Proposals have failed to recognise the existence of dis-Abled persons – country’s largest minority of people.

This article has justified why and how the following proposals are low/ no cost feasible investment­s bringing rich dividends, either economical­ly and socially or to start fulfilling enforced legal obligation­s and moral duties of this government. 1. Budget allocates several millions of additional rupees for improvemen­ts of the physical infrastruc­ture facilities of state and private sector in fields such as education and health, Acland House and Mumtaz Mahal and, introducin­g light train facilities to upgrade lifestyles. ADD a clause to make it mandatory that (Perhaps also include Lanka Sathosa Outlets) all these comply with the Supreme Court order SCFR 221/2009 of 27 April 2011 enabling physical access. 2. I propose: Fines for non-compliance, which could be used to establish a NEW fund named: Revenue with Relief fund. 3. Government should get funds from people who HAVE funds. None can justify why those unemployed due to permanent major dis-abilities and those terminally ill gravely should be equally taxed!! They are much worse off than even the seniors, as travel and medical costs alone are extremely high. They are the people who make best use of the internet to pay utility bills, channel doctors, etc. but are now asked to meet a telecom levy enhanced to 25%.

Total benefits they receive far outweigh additional outgoings. Why rob Peter to pay Paul? Like in other countries we do not ask for financial incentives but appeal for the generated monthly income through own investment­s with registered banks and financial institutio­ns, be made totally tax-free, to prolong our survival. 4. The Budget’s focus is on human developmen­t; BUT are dis-Abled persons NOT human to be overlooked? From clause 326 onwards empowermen­t of youth and women are talked about BUT nothing about the youth and women with disabiliti­es. IT being an employable skill, facilities at 3500 schools (clause 93) should afford increased opportunit­ies for children and adults with dis-Abilities, and those with extra-ordinary skills amongst them ( clause 97) should be further supported with the proposed Rs. 2,500/- monthly grant. 5. When new legislatio­n is intro- duced (clause 98), internatio­nal schools and non-state degree awarding institutio­n at least, must ensure physical access to all facilities, so that Smart Classrooms (clause 92) also become accessible class rooms to extend the 13 years of mandatory education and higher education EQUALLY to disAbled students. 6. Like price regulation­s for selected medication­s, exorbitant escalating charges by hospitals on pre-determined routine medical tests and rooms along with fees by doctors, should also be subjected to a maximum amount. When pharmacies undergo compulsory registrati­on with NMRA (clause 145) those remaining physically inaccessib­le and not user-friendly should be required to provide home-delivery services at no extra-cost for permanentl­y dis-abled persons living within establishe­d distances. 7. Sri Lanka Tourism should take measures from January 2017 to comply by design with the internatio­nal theme: Accessible Tourism for all. 8. It is now mandatory for the disAbled, like others, to enjoy the protection enshrined in the Constituti­on from the State and Private sector.

“No Person shall, on the grounds of race, religion, language, caste, gender, limitation in physical and / or mental ability or any one of such grounds, be subject to any dis-Ability, liability, restrictio­n, marginalis­a- tion, safety hazard or condition with regard to access to both state and private sector buildings, facilities and services therein the public needs to use in day- to- day life, including shops, hotels, restaurant­s, banks, hospitals, sports stadia, places of education - employment - recreation - entertainm­ent and worship of his own religion.” 9. Budget must enforce introducti­on of laws and effective implementa­tion from January 2017 to ensure that basic urban physical infrastruc­tures; public facilities and services under new Mega-polis agenda, end-up accessible and inclusive of all people’s needs, regardless of the degree of ability.

The wake-up call.

It is amazing why even the vociferous joint opposition (SLPP), JVP, JNP, TNA, joint front of the civil societies the late most venerable Sobitha Thera gave birth to - every one of them - continue to remain as deaf, dumb and blind towards the dis-Abled - country’s largest minority of people!

Justice delayed is justice denied and, in this case, loss of profits, a better tomorrow and the country’s good name too!

The final reading of the Budget 2017 is on the EVE of HUMAN RIGHTS DAY – the Judgement Day for the dis- Abled people of Sri Lanka. All Members of the Parliament have a moral duty to actively support them - that includes the heroic soldiers - in getting these proposals (No. 2 in particular) included in the Budget before passing.

 ??  ?? Not even a hand rail to hold but perhaps 100 steps to climb! Just one example of a marginalis­ation at the front entrance at a NEW leading 'State' complex at Battaramul­la that even houses several ministries.
Not even a hand rail to hold but perhaps 100 steps to climb! Just one example of a marginalis­ation at the front entrance at a NEW leading 'State' complex at Battaramul­la that even houses several ministries.
 ??  ?? Not even a hand rail to hold but perhaps 100 steps to climb! Just one example of a marginalis­ation at the front entrance at a NEW leading 'State' complex at Battaramul­la that even houses several ministries.
Not even a hand rail to hold but perhaps 100 steps to climb! Just one example of a marginalis­ation at the front entrance at a NEW leading 'State' complex at Battaramul­la that even houses several ministries.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Sri Lanka