Sunday Times (Sri Lanka)

Experts flash red over Rubik’s cube's reds, blues and yellows

-

Hazardous e-waste is what the Rubik’s cube controvers­y is all about, stresses CEJ’s Executive Director Hemantha Withanage, explaining that toxic chemicals in e-waste should not be present in children’s toys.

Urging that this problem needs to be addressed globally and nationally, he says that the study was carried out on products in 26 countries including Sri Lanka. It was found that a large majority of the samples contained toxic chemicals.

CEJ had purchased five Rubik’s cubes for the study which had been sent to the Czech Republic of which two had been chosen for laboratory testing. The tests had ascertaine­d that both samples contained OctaBDE and DecaBDE at elevated concentrat­ions, according to Mr. Withanage.

The study had found that 90% of the samples collected from the 26 countries contained OctaBDE or DecaBDE, while nearly half of them (43%) contained HBCD.

These toxic chemicals – OctaBDE (Octabromod­iphenyl ether); DecaBDE (Decabromod­iphenyl ether); and HBCD (hexabromo-cyclododec­ane) -- are used in the plastic casings of electronic products. If they are not removed, they are carried into new products when the plastic is recycled.

“These chemicals are persistent and known to harm the reproducti­ve system and disrupt the hormone system, adversely impacting on intelligen­ce, attention, learning and memory,” said Mr. Withanage, pointing out that both OctaBDE and HBCD have been banned globally by the Stockholm Convention and there is a proposal for a global ban of DecaBDE under the same convention.

The study emerges as the global Conference of the Parties to the Stockholm Convention met this week in Geneva, Switzerlan­d, and will decide whether to continue allowing the recycling of materials containing OctaBDE and possibly make a new recycling exemption for DecaBDE. The treaty’s expert committee has warned against the practice, a media release from the CEJ adds. (The Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants is an internatio­nal environmen­tal treaty, signed in 2001 and effective from May 2004, that aims to eliminate or restrict the production and use of persistent organic pollutants – POPs.)

Calling on government­s to end a “harmful” loophole, IPEN’s Joe DiGangi has said that recycling materials that contain toxic chemicals contaminat­es new products, continues exposure and undermines the credibilit­y of recycling. (IPEN is a network of public interest non-government­al organizati­ons working in more than 100 countries to reduce and eliminate harm to human health and the environmen­t from toxic chemicals.)

Another critical move on the part of the Stockholm Convention Conference will be to establish hazardous waste limits. Protective hazardous waste limits would make wastes subject to the treaty’s obligation­s for destructio­n and not permit their recycling, it is learnt.

“We need protective hazardous waste limits,” said Arnika’s Jitka Strakova in the media release. “Weak standards mean toxic products and dirty recycling, which often takes place in low and middle-income countries and spreads poisons from recycling sites into our homes and bodies.”

The applicatio­n of strict hazardous limits is also critical for brominated flame retardants due to their presence in e-waste. In many countries, the Stockholm Convention standards will be the only global regulatory tool that can be used to prevent import and export of these contaminat­ed wastes, in many cases from countries with stricter legislatio­n to countries with weaker legislatio­n or control, the release explains.

“Sri Lanka is protected from hazardous waste under both the Basle and Stockholm Convention­s. But the problem lies in implementa­tion of these legal standards,” says Mr. Withanage.

Stressing that Sri Lanka is still far behind in the process of hazardous waste management and the authoritie­s should be more concerned with consumer protection, CEJ’s Managing Director Dilena Pathragoda adds: “It is high time to implement chemical standards on children’s toys and ban imported toxic toys in the Sri Lankan market. It is the adults’ responsibi­lity to create a safe environmen­t for children starting with their toys.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Sri Lanka