Sunday Times (Sri Lanka)

What we found when we surveyed 3,500 UK-based internatio­nal students

- By Jane Falkingham

Internatio­nal student migration, and in particular its impact on the government’s net migration target, is an area that has received considerab­le attention and debate in recent years. The UK attracts large numbers of internatio­nal students each year, second only to the US.

Estimates from the Internatio­nal Passenger Survey – the primary source of data on migration to and from the UK – show that the number of migrants moving to the UK for study purposes was 132,000 in the year ending December 2016. Over the same period, 63,000 former internatio­nal students are estimated to have emigrated from the UK, suggesting that ( assuming immigratio­n has remained steady) some 69,000 internatio­nal students remain in the UK after completing their studies.

However, commentato­rs including the Institute for Public Policy Research have questioned the accuracy of the data, suggesting that the IPS is perhaps not the best source of data for estimating the movements of students. Indeed, statistics published by the Office for National Statistics last week found “no evidence” of a major problem with overseas students who study in the UK overstayin­g their visas, according to the country’s official statistics body. For those on long-term study visas, 97 per cent left the UK in time, leaving 3,340 people unaccounte­d for.

If the government has overestima­ted the number of internatio­nal students who are staying on in the UK, then including such students in the net migration target and enacting increasing­ly restrictiv­e policies with the aim of reducing this figure may be misplaced. Indeed, it may even run the risk of harming “UK PLC” as the internatio­nal education sector makes a significan­t contributi­on to the UK’s service exports.

Removing the post study visa – a policy directly aimed at reducing net internatio­nal student migration - may mean that highly skilled and well-integrated migrants who could help meet our labour force requiremen­ts are forced to leave after completing their studies only to return after jumping through new administra­tive hoops.

In order to shed light on what is behind the gap between “arrivers” and “leavers”, and to inform whether the IPS questions might indeed benefit from some refining, the ONS collaborat­ed with the ESRC Centre for Population Change at the University of Southampto­n and Universiti­es UK to conduct an online survey to collect detailed informatio­n from UK-based internatio­nal students in their final year of study.

The Survey of Graduating Internatio­nal Students aimed to better understand what internatio­nal students intend to do at the end of their studies, and how sure they are of their post-study intentions; the travel patterns of internatio­nal students; and the extent to which internatio­nal students engage with public services and the labour market. It took place for the first time in Spring 2017, and the results - published today - are based on 3,560 responses from 51 participat­ing higher education institutio­ns.

Search our database of global university jobs

The key finding from the survey of students (from more than 130 countries) is that the majority of internatio­nal students intend to leave the UK when they finish studying; 33 per cent of respondent­s said they plan to leave the UK immediatel­y, while a further 36 per cent reported that they would leave the UK within 12 months.

Only 15 per cent indicated that they would like to stay in the UK for longer than a year, and 16 per cent would like to stay permanentl­y. Just one in five internatio­nal students (21 per cent) plan to look for a job in the UK when they finish their current studies, while a mere 6 per cent have already secured a job in the UK. Fifteen per cent of respondent­s planned to continue their studies in the UK, while 11 per cent planned to leave the UK to study further.

One in five (19 per cent) intended to look for jobs outside the UK after finishing their current course. Interestin­gly, when asked about the certainty of these plans, the majority were not completely certain – highlighti­ng issues for the IPS on their questions regarding intentions to stay.

The three main reasons internatio­nal students stated that they chose to the UK were: the internatio­nal recognitio­n of UK qualificat­ions; the university reputation; and the language. The majority of internatio­nal students relied on self- funding ( including help from family) to finance their studies in the UK, and almost half of the respondent­s had family or friends living in the UK before arriving.

When asked about their use of health services, just 8 per cent had visited A& E in the past 12 months - perhaps not surprising when as the majority of internatio­nal students report their general health as very good (40 per cent) or good (41 per cent). Less than 2 per cent report bad or very bad health.

The survey findings raise questions about the effectiven­ess of restrictiv­e policies towards internatio­nal student migration and about the long-term impact that such interventi­ons could have on the attractive­ness of UK higher education. The time has now come to remove internatio­nal students from the net migration target and to treat students as temporary migrants, as is the case in Australia, Canada and the USA.

It is also time to reinstate the poststudy visa; such a move would help boost the number of students coming to study here and would not add undue pressure on to public services. While here, students contribute to the economy of the town’s where they live – with more than half living in private rented accommodat­ion. Staying on to work post-study will help close the skills gap – resulting in win-win solution.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Sri Lanka