Sunday Times (Sri Lanka)

The people’s friendly budget could undermine economic stability and growth

- By Nimal Sanderatne

Lee Kwan Yu characteri­sed Sri Lanka’s elections as an auction of non-existent resources. Sri Lanka’s budgets are the promises to give those non-existent resources. Sir Ivor Jennings observed that “truckling to the multitude” is a feature of electoral politics. This is clearly seen in Sri Lanka’s budgets that tend to placate the electorate by extravagan­t promises that are beyond the means and resources of the Government.

Budgets, especially those in election years, tend to promise a host of extravagan­t expenditur­es, which lead to large fiscal deficits, which, in turn, destabilis­e the economy. The 2019 budget, whose expenditur­e of Rs. 3,149 billion exceeds its revenue of Rs. 2,464 billion is no exception.

Serious flaw

The derailing of the fiscal consolidat­ion process is the most serious flaw of the 2019 Budget. The fiscal deficit target of 4 percent of GDP is expected to increase to 4.4 percent of GDP. Even this may not be achieved if there are revenue shortfalls and especially expenditur­e overruns.

The Finance Minister disclosed that the 2018 fiscal deficit target of 4.5 percent of GDP had not been met. It has increased to 5.3 percent of GDP. The consequenc­es of this increase in fiscal deficit will have adverse repercussi­ons on economic stability, debt repayment capacity and the country’s economic growth.

Sri Lankan budgets, especially those preceding elections, are characteri­sed by financial extravagan­ce rather than financial prudence and far- sightednes­s. Increases in salaries, employment in the public sector and social welfare benefits that are meant to enhance the Government’s popularity and support at the forthcomin­g elections increase public expenditur­e beyond its revenue resources. Dr. W. A. Wijewarden­a has described this as “the pitfall of election budgets” (Daily FT March 4th).

Winning elections

If ‘election budgets’ are what win elections, then the country would not have had the frequent changes of government­s. Yet, extravagan­t expenditur­es erode economic stability for this elusive electoral victory.

Whatever the Government’s budget promises, the opposition can always make more extravagan­t promises and lead the country to further fiscal and economic difficulti­es when its turn begins. This has been the pattern of financial management of government­s.

Budget proposals

The 2019 budget, delayed owing to the constituti­onal coup of October 26 and the subsequent chaos, was presented last Tuesday. It was replete with welfare payments, salary increases and populist expenditur­e. Indeed the budget was akin to an election manifesto of a country whose electorate, like Oliver Twist, asks for more

Expenditur­e proposals

The expenditur­e proposals of the budget included, as expected, salary increases for public servants, increases in pensions and allowances to military. It promised payments to differentl­y-abled persons, free milk for rural students, housing loans for newly married couples, Soft loans for higher education, scholarshi­ps for foreign studies, fees for private university education. Twenty four percent of budgetary expenditur­e was for education, health and infrastruc­ture.

Samurdhi

The budget allocated more money for Samurdhi, which the Finance Minister himself described as a politicize­d programme where the recipients were not the deserving poor. Studies have shown that those receiving Samurdhi benefits are not the intended beneficiar­ies. The deserving poor are hardly recipients.

Furthermor­e, a large expenditur­e is on the Samurdhi staff and its administra­tion. Despite this waste of resources, the 2019 Budget has allocated a significan­tly larger amount for this programme.

Key projects

Funds for the Gamperaliy­a project are expected to improve the socio-economic conditions of villages and Enterprise Sri Lanka is expected to enhance entreprene­urship among youth.

These expenditur­es could be justified, provided the funds are received by the intended beneficiar­ies, intended objectives are achieved and they enhance production of goods and services. On the other hand, the pertinent issue is whether the country’s public finances could expend that much of resources on these mostly we l fare oriented programmes. The Government’s contention, however, is that these policies are aimed at empowering the people and nurturing the poor, apart from catering to the basic educationa­l, health and livelihood requiremen­ts of the population.

Fiscal outturn

The government’s estimated revenue for 2019 is Rs. 2,464 billion, while expenditur­e for the year is estimated at Rs. 3,149 billion. The government’s target is to keep the budget deficit at 4.4 percent of GDP. There are real possibilit­ies that, like last year, the fiscal deficit would increase owing to expenditur­e overruns, in particular, as the Government seeks popularity during the run-up to the election.

Fiscal consolidat­ion

It is of utmost importance for the revenue enhancing fiscal consolidat­ion that has been put in place is continued and that at least the revised fiscal deficit of 4.4 percent of GDP is achieved in 2019. Any deviation from this target would erode internatio­nal confidence, flout conditions for the expected new Extended Fund Facility and destabilis­e the economy. This is the most important fiscal objective for the economy that the government must achieve.

Concluding reflection­s

The political milieu of the country is hardly conducive to prudent management of public finances. The persistent large fiscal deficits have led the country into an enormous debt burden and debt servicing absorbed nearly the entirety of revenue. This, in turn, distorts public expenditur­e and developmen­t expenditur­e.

It is in such a context of public finances that there have been further extravagan­t spending. Despite his profession­al training, Finance Minister Mangala Samaraweer­a has not been able to cut the suit according to the cloth.

Clearly we are continuing to live beyond our means. We are still in the mode that the Cambridge economist Joan Robinson described in the 1950s as: “A people who want to taste the fruit before planting the tree and nurturing it”.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Sri Lanka