Sunday Times (Sri Lanka)

The fate of microplast­ics in soil

Sammani Ramanayaka and Meththika Vithanage Ecosphere Resilience Research Centre, University of Sri Jayewarden­epura

-

Plastics are synthetic organic polymers with high molecular masses, which are derived from petrochemi­cals. Bakelite is the world’s first synthetic polymer, which is made from phenol and formaldehy­de, by a Belgian- born American, Leo Hendrik Baekeland in 1907. The low cost, easy manufactur­e, user- friendly, and versatile properties of plastics have achieved rapid popularity worldwide. Most of the traditiona­l materials, such as wood, glass, and metal, were substitute­d with plastic, including household materials and other materials.

However, due to the prolonged degradatio­n of plastics, it is possible to exist for over a hundred or maybe a thousand years and accumulate in the environmen­t. More than 32% of all plastic production is environmen­tally available according to experiment­al data. Environmen­tal pollution by plastics does not limit only to slow degradatio­n. The micro- scale plastic part i cles from the weathering process of plastics, as well as from man- made products such as cosmetics, can be more harmful to both human and the ecosystem. These microscale plastics particles are known as “microplast­ics,” which has gained recent global attention. In 2004, Professor Richard Thompson from the UK had introduced the term “microplast­ics” and the plastic fragments, which is less than 5 mm in size, is known as microplast­ics.

Microplast­ics can be classified into two main groups, primary microplast­ics, for instance, microfiber­s, microbeads, and plastic pellets, which discharges from personal care products, synthetic fabrics, and various industries. Secondary microplast­ics generates due to the degradatio­n of larger plastic products under the natural weathering process. Ultra violet radiation in sunlight is one of the governing factors in plastic film degradatio­n, which is known as photoinduc­ed degradatio­n. Other de g radation pathways for microplast­ic de g radat i o n , decomposit­ion and disintegra­tion are through hydrolysis; rainwater, ozonolysis; and oxidation. Most of the studies on microplast­ics have focused on assessing the effects on aquatic environmen­ts, while a limited number of studies have been conducted on the effects on soils. Scientists have estimated that soils might s t o re more microplast­ics rather than aquatic environmen­ts. Anthropoge­nic activities such as plastic mulches in agricultur­e, contaminat­ed water sources from household and industrial effluents, and applicatio­n of compost from municipal solid waste, may contaminat­e the soils with microplast­ics.

The method of contaminat­ion of microplast­ics in the soil can vary from place to place. Other than the microbeads from personal care products, the possible contaminat­ion pathways are plastic mulches in agricultur­al lands and municipal solid waste compost. In Sri Lanka, most of the microplast­ics pollution is triggered by the applicatio­n of commercial­ly available compost. Due to inadequate segregatio­n of waste, organic municipal solid waste has been contaminat­ed with plastics. In the compost degradatio­n process, these plastics also can be degraded to microplast­ics and pollute the final product. Sri Lankan farmers utilize compost in organic farming as well as in general cultivatio­n, mixing up with fertilizer­s. Other than the agricultur­al lands, homesteads also have applied compost to boost the growth of plants. Therefore, microplast­ics in compost can contaminat­e the soil in various means.

Plastic mulches are degradable polyethyle­ne covers, which is used to cover the surface soil to protect water from evaporatio­n, soil erosion, and suppress the growth of weeds. Although plastic mulches are very famous in foreign countries, it is not much popular in Sri Lanka. Upland farmers use these plastic mulches to control soil erosion in incline lands. However, with the time, degradatio­n of polyethyle­ne sheets releases microplast­ics directly to the soil, and the pollution of microplast­ics can be larger than the applicatio­n of contaminat­ed compost.

Scientists have investigat­ed the effects of microplast­ics on soil and found out the adverse effect on the physical, chemical, and biological properties of soils. Microplast­ics can act as a vector, which can adsorb substances, transport to a different place, and then desorb. Organic pollutants (e. g. persistent organic pollutants ( POPs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbo­ns ( PAHs), polychlori­nated biphenyls (PCBs), pesticides and herbicides), and pharmaceut­icals such as antibiotic­s are common pollutants, which has a better affinity to bind on microplast­ics. Although there is not much affinity to inorganic heavy metals such as mercury, lead, cadmium, these metals can be bound by weak bonds, transport, and release at a different location due to a slight change in pH in the media. Therefore, a direct influence on soil chemistry is observed, and soil can make complexes, especially with org a n i c p o l l u t a n t s. Furthermor­e, heavy metals accumulati­on in the soil can affect the soil resident animals, while antibiotic­s a t t a ch e d to microplast­ics in nat u r a l environmen­ts can develop antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

Soil biota plays a vital role in soil ecosystem, agricultur­e, and plant growth. Soil biota includes the micro-organisms (bacteria, fungi, archaea, and algae), soil animals ( protozoa, nematodes, mites, springtail­s, spiders, insects, and earthworms) and plants. The decomposit­ion of organic matter by soil organisms has an immense influence on soil fertility, plant growth, soil structure, and carbon storage. Studies have reported that microplast­ics can harm the earthworm’s intestinal tract and cause death. Other than earthworms, microplast­ic is harmful to filter feeders, including c i l i ates and flagellate­s. Microplast­ics can directly influence the vital relationsh­ip between soil and water, soil structure, and microbial function. In 2018, the same German research group had conducted the first explorativ­e datadriven analysis of microplast­ic impacts on soil function. They have used Polyester, polyacryli­c, and polyethyle­ne, which are some of the commonly found microplast­ics in the soil to assess the biophysica­l environmen­t of soil. From the overall results of the research, it was clear that microplast­ics directly influence the physical properties of soil by decreasing the soil bulk density, water- stable soil aggregates, and water holding capacity.

Not only soil organisms, but also plant systems may have influences from microplast­ics. In 2019 a research group from Germany had studied the performanc­e of spring onion plants ( Allium fistulosum) with the most common types of microplast­ics. The study revealed significan­t changes in plant biomasses, elemental tissue compositio­n, and root traits with the presence of microplast­ic in the soil. Other than the type of the microplast­ic particle, the shape also affects the performanc­e of the plant. Particles which has a similar shape to natural soil particles demonstrat­es minimal difference­s in the behaviour of plant, while different shapes demonstrat­ed substantia­l difference­s. Some studies have shown an increase in plant growth at the presence of microplast­ics however, scientists seem reluctant to state that the microplast­ics increase overall growth performanc­e of plants as no adequate research done to conclude. Plant growth effects may govern by types of microplast­ics, their characteri­stics, size, and plant species. Even if the plant growth increases pervasive effects may be present for the plant performanc­e and ecosystem biodiversi­ty.

These anthropoge­nic adulterant­s pollute to the terrestria­l ecosystem. Finally, the adverse effects of soil pollution by microplast­ics influence soil fertility, crop production, food security, as well as human health. Therefore, the general public should be educated more about microplast­ics, how can it contaminat­e soil, and how to protect soil from microplast­ic contaminat­ion. Neverthele­ss, scientists should conduct more research studies to understand the fate of soil microplast­ics and their implicatio­ns on soil organisms. Since plastic recycling is not performing well in Sri Lanka, it is our responsibi­lity to reduce the u t i l i z ation of plastic and polyethyle­ne products as much as possible. Furthermor­e, the government of Sri Lanka can bring up the necessary rules and regulation­s to discourage the production and import, personal care products which are rich in primary microplast­ics. As an agricultur­al- based country, it is essential to pay attention on keeping soil fertility, health, and condition appropriat­e for sustainabl­e agricultur­e.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Sri Lanka