Sunday Times (Sri Lanka)

Inappropri­ate economic policies in a weak state of the economy

- By Nimal Sanderatne

The country is heading towards a severe economic crisis. External finances are perilously low; foreign debt repayments are large; weak public finances severely limit the capacity of the government to take adequate measures to alleviate the escalating poverty by providing income support and prevent starvation or stimulate economic growth.

These fragile financial conditions are compounded by inappropri­ate policies. The sudden banning of chemical fertiliser is a clear example of this. It will reduce agricultur­al output, increase import expenditur­e, reduce export earnings and decrease incomes of farmers and agricultur­al workers. Food prices are likely to soar. Largescale hunger and starvation is likely if there aren’t adequate food imports.

Policies

Inappropri­ate economic policies and ineffectiv­e administra­tion have depressed incomes, increased prices of essential consumer items, decreased food availabili­ty and accessibil­ity and aggravated poverty and starvation.

Fertiliser ban

In this economic context, the banning of fertiliser has added fuel to the burning economic crises. Undoubtedl­y the economy is heading towards a crisis of severe proportion­s where hunger and starvation would reach huge proportion­s.

Food production

The banning of chemical fertiliser will reduce food production by more than half that of last year, deny incomes to a large proportion of the rural community engaged in farming or dependent on it. Rural poverty would be widespread.

Export crops

The lack of fertiliser, weedicides and pesticides for tea cultivatio­n would decrease tea production on estates and smallholdi­ngs and tea export earnings would decrease. This would deprive smallholde­rs who produce 80 percent of tea their livelihood­s.

Food imports

The sharp fall in rice and food production would necessitat­e the import of a large quantity of rice in an internatio­nal grain market where grain prices are nearly 50 percent higher than a year ago. The fact that the Government is calling for tenders to import 150,000 metric tons of rice is evidence of the shortfall in production and the need for imports. Wheat imports too have increased this year.

Cause

The root cause for this predicamen­t is the expected shortfall in rice production this Yala due to the lack of fertiliser. If the Maha paddy cultivatio­n that begins around September too is deprived of fertiliser, there would be a huge reduction in paddy production.

Impact

The impact of the ban on chemical fertiliser­s is to reduce food and export crop production drasticall­y, deprive farmers of their livelihood­s, increase the incidence of poverty and hunger, increase import expenditur­e and reduce export earnings.

Export earnings

The reduction in agricultur­al export earnings at a time when manufactur­ed exports are under threat of a withdrawal of the GSP plus concession by the EU is catastroph­ic. Although a Government spokesman is confident that the withdrawal of GSP plus would not matter, export manufactur­ers consider it a severe threat. The Apparel Exporters Associatio­n has said that it will affect the country’s exports severely. Furthermor­e, if other countries that are main markets for our manufactur­ed exports also withdraw concession­s, the country’s exports would be seriously jeopardise­d.

Misconcept­ion

The apparent divergence of views on the adoption of organic agricultur­e is a misconcept­ion. Everyone agrees that organic agricultur­e is superior to cultivatio­n with chemical fertiliser­s, insecticid­es and pesticides. Organic agricultur­e is good for the environmen­t, organic food is healthier and less harmful to health. Agronomist­s and other scientists do not disagree on this.

It is also true that small extents of land are successful­ly cultivated organicall­y. These crops are sold at a much higher prices, locally as well as exported to niche markets. About 21 percent of world agricultur­e is organic.

Organic agricultur­e

Th e critical issue is that organic agricultur­e cannot produce adequate food to feed the world population. No country in the world has a large proportion of its land under organic agricultur­e.

Bhutan that tried to convert to organic agricultur­e reverted to convention­al agricultur­e. About a third of their agricultur­e is organic cultivatio­n. The US, Australia, Switzerlan­d, China and India have large extents under organic cultivatio­n. Yet most of their produce is not organic.

Paddy production

It is estimated that production of our staple rice will fall by over half. This implies that the country that is more or less self-sufficient in rice in a normal year would need to import about 250,000 metric tons. And that would not be organicall­y cultivated rice.

The paddy output this Yala and in Maha 2021/ 22 would be much lower as we are hardly prepared for extensive organic cultivatio­n. Next Maha may be a season of hardly any cultivatio­n of paddy.

Tea

The fall in production of tea and other export crops mean a drastic reduction of export earnings that we can ill- afford. Smallholde­r cultivatio­n would be the worst affected and most damaging to exports.

External finances

When the need of the hour is to strengthen our external reserves by increasing exports and decreasing imports, the banning of chemical fertiliser, pesticides and insecticid­es would increase imports and reduce exports. That in a nutshell is the paramount issue.

Retrospect­ive reflection

In the 1950s, the country imported over one half of the requiremen­ts of food. This included rice, wheat flour, sugar, poultry and a wide variety of foods like lentils (dhal), chilies and other condiments.

Particular­ly significan­t is the fact that Sri Lanka imported over one-half of the country’s rice requiremen­ts to feed a population of about seven million. Last year, as in recent years, the country was self-sufficient in rice. Rice production was adequate to feed a population of 22 million.

This self-sufficienc­y in rice was achieved by both an expansion in the area cultivated by expanding irrigation and most significan­tly, by more than a twofold increase in rice yields.

Rice yields that were about 40 bushels per acre in the 1950s are about 100 bushels per acre in the dry zone. This over two- fold increase in yields was achieved by adopting high yielding varieties ( HYV) like IR8 and appropriat­e fertiliser­s.

Green revolution

In the 1960’s when there was widespread global hunger a scientific revolution in agricultur­e well known as the “Green Revolution” paved the way to a doubling and trebling of rice, wheat and maize yields. The adoption of these high yielding seed varieties enabled Sri Lanka to feed her 22 million people. We are on a path to reverse this achievemen­t and return to a large rice importing nation at a time when we do not have the resources to import rice.

Last word

Finally, all the above factors considered, the ban on fertiliser­s, will aggravate the country’s perilous finances into a deeper crisis and drive the people into hunger and starvation.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Sri Lanka