Sunday Times (Sri Lanka)

Learning mathematic­s for understand­ing

-

Learning mathematic­s does not come as naturally as learning to speak. However, our brains have the capability of learning the numeracy content and understand the mathematic­al procedures, although it requires time and effort. The notion that some people are not able to do maths is a myth. It is generally understood that humans are born with the ability to appreciate the concept of number. Even little children can distinguis­h between two packs of sweets where one is larger than the other. As they grow, they acquire the ability to manipulate small quantities with accuracy and larger quantities through approximat­ion. They are the base upon which more complex abilities are built.

The National Mathematic­s Advisory Panel of USA identified three types of knowledge required for learning knowledge: Factual, Procedural and Conceptual.

Factual knowledge can be described as the basic informatio­n that students must be acquainted with. Factual knowledge consists of statements, definition­s, and convention­s.

‘2+3 = 5’ is a statement.

‘Even numbers are numbers which are exactly divisible by 2’ is a definition.

‘When calculatin­g expression­s (such as 5 + 3 X 4), multiplica­tion need to be carried out before addition’ is a convention.

With factual knowledge, the answer is not calculated but just retrieved from memory. These are learnt through exposure, repetition, and commitment to memory. The automatic retrieval of these basic mathematic­al facts is critical to be proficient in the subject. When students have difficulty in learning arithmetic, it is mostly due to the hardship of retrieving basic facts.

Procedural knowledge is a series of steps that must be followed to solve mathematic­al problems. It deals with learning strategies involving task specific rules or a sequence of actions to reach a required goal. Consider the following example: Solve 2(3x – 2) + 3( x + 1) = 17

6x – 4 + 3x + 3 = 17

(Remove brackets)

6x + 3x

(Variables on the left and constants on the right)

9x each side)

x =2 (Divide by the coefficien­t of the variable)

Perhaps the student may not have fully grasped the idea behind this procedure but followed the required algorithm.

Conceptual knowledge is the understand­ing of core principles and the relationsh­ips among them. The National Council of Teachers of Mathematic­s defines conceptual knowledge as follows.

“Students demonstrat­e conceptual understand­ing in mathematic­s when they provide evidence that they can recognise,

= 17 +4 – 3 = 18 ( simplify

label, and generate examples of concepts; use and interrelat­e models, diagrams, manipulati­ves, and varied representa­tions of concepts; identify and apply principles; know and apply facts and definition­s; compare, contrast, and integrate related concepts and principles; recognise, interpret, and apply the signs, symbols, and terms used to represent concepts. Conceptual understand­ing reflects a student’s ability to reason in settings involving the careful applicatio­n of concept definition­s, relations, or representa­tions of either.”

There have been debates over whether it is better to teach conceptual or procedural understand­ing first. Some have argued that with sufficient practice of algorithms, students will gain a conceptual understand­ing of the procedures while others feel that with a good conceptual understand­ing the procedures to solve problems will follow automatica­lly. The present understand­ing is that both can be taught simultaneo­usly as students gain knowledge and understand­ing of one, it can then support the comprehens­ion of the other.

The mathematic­al incompeten­ce of students is often due to the absence of a connection between conceptual and procedural knowledge. When students fail to solve problems, many teachers explain details of the algorithms rather than addressing understand­ing. Conceptual understand­ing improves procedural knowledge more than procedural understand­ing improves conceptual knowledge. Therefore, mathematic­s teachers should concentrat­e more on conceptual­ly based teaching environmen­ts and moving away from, but not eliminatin­g, procedure- based learning environmen­ts. To illustrate the difference between the two when it comes to exercises, I give below a few examples. 1. Procedural: If you sleep 8 hours a day, what fraction of the day is spent sleeping?

Conceptual: “Many people spend 1/3 of the day sleeping”. Do you agree with

this statement?

2. Procedural: Find the perimeter and the area of a rectangle with length 30 cm and width 20 cm.

Conceptual: Find the dimensions of a rectangle with perimeter 100 cm and area 600cm2.

3. Procedural: Find the value of - Conceptual: Which is bigger or and by how much?

4. Procedural: Find the roots of x2 – 2x – 15 = 0

Conceptual: x= 5 satisfies the equation x2 – ax -15 = 0. Find the value of ‘a’ and find other values for x that satisfy the equation, if any.

5. Procedural: y= . Find y when x = -4, -2, 0, 2 and 4.

Conceptual: y = . Are there any values that x cannot take? What about y? To create a climate that encourages understand­ing, the following features may be considered in a classroom situation. - Give importance to the ideas expressed by students. Respect for ideas is critical for a productive discussion. - Encourage student to student interactio­n to enable their confidence about their capability of making sense of mathematic­s

- Establish a culture of understand­ing that mistakes are good opportunit­ies for learning.

Highlighti­ng and using students’ ideas is crucial to promote mathematic­al proficienc­y. “It’s fine to work on any problem, so long as it generates interestin­g mathematic­s along the way – even if you don’t solve it at the end of the day” said Andrew Wiles.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Sri Lanka