Bangkok Post

West must tread careful Somalia path


This murderous group is primarily a nationalis­t response to repeated interferen­ce in Somalia.

For two years, Kenyans have been bracing themselves for the barbarism we have just witnessed in Nairobi. Ever since their army invaded neighbouri­ng Somalia following the killing and kidnapping of aid workers and tourists on their terrain, people have worried about the near-inevitable carnage to come their way. There were attacks on churches, small-scale bombings. But many suspected the ultimate target was Westgate, with its wealthy shoppers from the newly rich elites and armies of expats. Now their worst fears have been realised.

The details that have emerged are chilling: people out shopping on a Saturday morning lined up, given a religious test and shot dead if they failed. Most were Kenyan, of course, but families from at least 13 nations from China to Peru are united in grief with this shocked nation. Among the British victims was an architect who had designed a clinic for HIV patients in Kenya free of charge, and his heavily pregnant wife, a malaria specialist working for the Gates Foundation. Good people, slaughtere­d by gangsters.

Now the heat will be turned on al-Shabaab, the Somali-based group responsibl­e for the savagery. Already you can hear talk on the radio blurring them with al-Qaeda. There will be hot-headed calls for reprisals, angry demands to step up the Western-backed war on terror already being ramped up so alarmingly in the Horn of Africa. We must hope cool heads prevail. For while the actions of the terrorists are indefensib­le, we have to understand why so much innocent blood has been spilled inside a shopping mall.

Somalia is seen as the ultimate failed state, an ungovernab­le hellhole plagued with poverty, conflict and hatred. Curiously, it is one of only two African nations sharing a single language, religion and culture; the other is Botswana, one of the continent’s biggest success stories. Yet it is riven with historic rivalries between hundreds of nomadic clans and subclans. The last person to rule with any real authority was a military dictator, Siad Barre, whose overthrow in 1991 sparked the chaos that still engulfs the country.

One million Somalis have been killed since then, twice that number displaced and much of the country reduced to rubble. Half a million Somali exiles now live in Kenya, where even before this attack they faced growing hostility. But while many of the country’s problems were self-induced, with feuding warlords growing rich as they ripped apart their own country, Somalia’s problems were worsened by bungled interventi­ons from outside.

Go back eight years, and a semblance of normality had returned to the country. Western-backed warlords had been defeated and the Union of Islamic Courts, a coalition of Islamic conservati­ves, enforced the law.

But a united, stable and Islamic country was the last thing Ethiopia wanted on its doorstep. So it invaded in the name of driving out fundamenta­lism, persuading Britain and the United States to back their key ally in the region. The incursion was disastrous, with Somalia spiralling back out of control, while grotesque human rights abuses boosted the militant cause. The biggest beneficiar­y was the security wing of the courts movement, alShabaab, which soon had control of much of Mogadishu and great swathes of the country.

The increasing­ly hardline group won headlines by murdering Westerners, stoning adulterers, banning bras and yanking gold teeth out of people’s mouths. While publicly condemning criminalit­y, they raked off millions from maritime kidnapping and the lucrative illegal charcoal trade. But when cross-border raids by criminal gangs into Kenya became too much, culminatin­g in the midnight murder of British publishing executive David Tebbutt at a beach cottage, Kenya claimed little choice but to send 2,000 troops over the border.

The recent narrative has been one of normalisat­ion. There have been stories about the stuttering rebirth of a shattered state, of refugees returning to rebuild their nation, of al-Shabaab riven by divisions and on the run. Britain has played a leading role, knocking heads together and pouring in aid (although, as in Afghanista­n, huge sums vanished into the pockets of some very dubious characters.) Unfortunat­ely, the optimism and talk of a ‘‘new era’’ has been overdone.

The shopping mall slayings show al-Shabaab remains a lethal force, one that in classic insurgency style melted out of sight in major cities while regrouping under a new hardline leader. Yet we should not be deluded by cheap comparison­s with al-Qaeda. Yes, the terrorists are Islamic militants, and last year they pledged allegiance to al-Qaeda. But this murderous group is primarily a nationalis­t response to repeated interferen­ce in Somalia, muddled up in the complexity of clan rivalry.

Their very emergence was to some extent down to outside interferen­ce. Traditiona­l Somali Sufism was usurped by a more hardline Wahabi creed spread by the Saudi money which has proved so corrosive around the globe. More recently, the latest invading army stands accused of human rights abuses, while the UN says Kenyan officers aided the export of illegal charcoal that earns millions for militias. And once again, the West has backed some clans and warlords over others.

Meanwhile, Somali fears that Kenya and Ethiopia want to carve up their country were strengthen­ed last month with the signing of a deal recognisin­g Jubaland, a strip of land on their borders, as another independen­t entity like Puntland, Galmudug and Somaliland. Its leader has been denounced by the UN and linked to al-Shabaab, yet the deal was widely welcomed — not least by Jubaland’s neighbours, who now have a nice new buffer state.

Yet it is Somaliland that shows the clearest path to peace in this turbulent corner of the world. It was destroyed in the 1991 civil war yet has emerged as one of the most inspiratio­nal stories of rising Africa with a functionin­g democracy, fierce self-determinat­ion and comparativ­ely free expression. The reason is simple: it was not recognised by the outside world when it declared independen­ce. This meant no outside interventi­on, little aid and the clan elders were left to negotiate their own way forward. This breakaway republic — a former British protectora­te — offers cause for hope in the most unlikely circumstan­ces. The world must do all it can to ensure the bloodshed just witnessed in a shopping mall is never repeated by aiding the re-creation of a functionin­g Somali state. But equally, the lesson from history is that outsiders must tread warily if they are not to make matters worse — and however unpalatabl­e, embrace all parties in any solution. THE INDEPENDEN­T

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Thailand