Bangkok Post

Fighting hate step by step is all we can do

- Kong Rithdee Kong Rithdee is Deputy Life Editor, Bangkok Post.

I’ve lost sleep over the Charlie Hebdo killings. Anger, confusion, frustratio­n and even pain descended on my pillow like the flapping wings of an evil bat, and I reach back into my own experience to try to make sense of the bleak future ahead of us.

Nine years ago, I made a documentar­y about a Buddhist woman who converted to Islam in order to marry a Muslim man. Her name is Thanwadee Hemara, and I and my two co-directors spent two years following her transforma­tion: from a Buddhist to a Muslim, from someone who prayed to Buddha to someone who prayed to Allah, from a woman to a wife, from a wife to a mother. It was hard, but she came through splendidly. The couple now have three lovely children.

We called the film The Convert, and we were lucky to get a slot at Lido. As expected, few people went to see it; perhaps just a few hundred over two weeks.

There was a small problem though. We received a letter signed by a group of Muslim women who criticised us for showing inappropri­ate images in the film. At first, we thought it was the crucial scene when Ms Thanwadee has to say the pledge in Arabic — “There is no God but Allah, and Mohammad is the Messenger of Allah” — and she didn’t quite nail it convincing­ly. But no, the objection concerned a few scenes in which the converted Ms Thanwadee was shown without a veil, and when she walked hand in hand with her husband. The letter demanded we do something to correct this bad representa­tion of muslimah.

We were surprised. We thought (or it was our intention) that the film was a human story that expressed something about resilience and the possibilit­y of harmony in the tense climate after 9/11. It’s not even a film about religion per se, but about the struggle for understand­ing and co-existence.

Small acts of nobility and sacrifice are what we need

in this time of chaos.

I didn’t respond to the letter, and the matter died down. Two years later, our team made another documentar­y about a Muslim rock band that plays Arab-Malay music at mosque fairs and weddings — again, our idea was to present the everyday realities of the Muslim population. This time, we got more than a letter: a Facebook page went up to denounce us and rally Muslims to ban the film because, according to our conservati­ve critics, modern music is haram — or forbidden. A lengthy online debate followed, sometimes educationa­l, sometimes absurd. But still, it’s proof that debate was, and is, possible, even though we disagreed deeply in the end.

Fast forward to last November. A young Muslim called me and asked me to watch a film he had just finished. It was a 90-minute fictional story set in the North featuring an imam, a hitman, a blind boy and a group of mistreated Rohingya. It was also packed with messages exalting the Prophet Mohammad and the virtues of Islam. The man said he made the film as a response to that scandalous clip Innocence of Muslims, the hateful, antiIslam piece of nonsense that provoked widespread fury and protests in the Islamic world back in 2012. At his office in Ramkhamhae­ng, the young filmmaker told me he wanted “to show the film in Europe so Westerners will have a better understand­ing of Islam”. He was sad and angry that the prophet was insulted, and he wanted to do something to fight those non-believers. His film, made with a paltry budget, was his weapon.

I salute him. The young man is so sincere, so passionate (and I have to say it, so innocent), even though no European cinemas would play his film, and it will be difficult to attract Western viewers to watch a few minutes of it even if he puts it online. I told him so — his film is too local, too convention­al, too non-provocativ­e maybe. But with my hand on my heart, I salute him and tell him that he must keep doing what he’s doing, because he chooses not to return insult with insult, not to fight hate speech with hate speech — or something worse and ungodly. His film is far from perfect, but his faith is. And he’s adopted a tone so gentle in his argument against those who hurt him that some people might say it verges on boring — and “boring” won’t sell a movie or a magazine.

Not many will watch his film, though I’m sure more people will watch his than those who watched mine. But that’s the point: he doesn’t have to aim for five million viewers, because small acts of nobility and sacrifice are what we need in this time of chaos and extremism. He wants to bridge the gap, and doing it just one step at a time is heartbreak­ing, but inevitable.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Thailand