Muslim anxieties don’t paint bright future for India
Acouple of weeks ago, Narendra Modi was celebrating his biggest electoral triumph since becoming India’s prime minister in 2014. His Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) had swept into power in Uttar Pradesh, India’s largest state and one of its poorest. The scale of the victory left the BJP’s opponents shell-shocked, and seemed to indicate that Mr Modi will be a shoo-in to secure a second term in 2019. Anticipating deeper economic reforms from a strengthened Modi administration, India’s stock market surged.
But there is one group with little reason to celebrate the BJP’s victory: India’s 172 million Muslims.
For decades, most of India’s political parties have practised forms of “strategic secularism” to secure a so-called Muslim vote bank — an approach that has stoked resentment among the country’s Hindu majority while doing little to improve Muslims’ wellbeing. The BJP has gone another route, focusing on drawing votes from aggrieved Hindus. In Uttar Pradesh, the BJP did not put up a single Muslim candidate, even though about 18% of the state’s population is Muslim. That did not have to mean that a BJP victory would be bad for Muslims. On the contrary, the party’s success put it in a strong position to reach out to the Muslim community on core development issues. But, judging by the BJP’s actions since the election, this appears unlikely.
The BJP revealed its thinking within days of the election, when it appointed politician-priest Yogi Adityanath, first elected to parliament in 1998 at the age of 26, as chief minister of Uttar Pradesh. While Mr Adityanath has a strong local power base in the abjectly poor eastern part of the state, which has supported his reelection five times, he has no administrative experience.
More troubling is that Mr Adityanath represents some of the BJP’s most extreme elements. He is a poster child for sectarian strains of Hindu nationalism — a firebrand Muslim-baiter who, along with his followers, has been accused of fomenting communal riots.
Mr Adityanath’s behaviour has triggered multiple criminal cases against him, which are languishing in India’s notoriously slowmoving courts. (Now that Mr Adityanath is in control of the state’s police, those cases surely will not move forward.) That behaviour has also won him a stamp of approval from the BJP’s ideological parent, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), which apparently strongly backed him for the chief minister’s position.
The appointment of Mr Adityanath thus seems to indicate that the BJP will employ anti-Muslim animus in its effort to consolidate Hindu votes in the 2019 national elections. But that strategy is clearly at odds with Mr Modi’s rhetorical focus on economic development. In fact, one of the likely consequences of Mr Adityanath’s promotion — and the negative signal it sends to India’s largest religious minority — is that economic development will suffer.
India’s Muslims will be hit particularly hard, with further social and political marginalisation undermining their economic prospects. Given the size of India’s Muslim population, this is bound to drag down overall economic development.
The consequences will be felt across Uttar Pradesh. If polarisation and strife increase, much-needed investment will not materialise, and the state’s already scarce human capital will flee, making it all but impossible to improve economic performance. Because Uttar Pradesh is home to one-sixth of India’s population, this will have far-reaching consequences for the country’s overall economic growth.
Likewise, Uttar Pradesh’s dismal social indicators — it has India’s worst infant and under-five mortality rates — will have negative externalities for the country as a whole.
To see what happens when politicians pander to religion, one need only look at neighbouring Pakistan. A bigoted chief minister running India’s largest state might well help the ruling party’s short-term electoral prospects, but it could have serious consequences for the country over the longer term.
The risks extend far beyond economics. While India is home to one of the world’s largest Muslim communities, its members have remained absent from anxious global conversations about militant Islam. This may reflect, at least partly, India’s pluralistic society and competitive democracy — a system in which almost all communities have felt included, even if their odds of winning have been low.
But if India’s Muslims feel deliberately shut out, as they might in the wake of Mr Adityanath’s appointment, they may come to believe that they have little to lose. As it is, India’s burgeoning youth population is struggling to find employment opportunities, making them easy targets for troublemakers. With the Islamic State and Pakistan’s wayward security service, the Inter-Services Intelligence, looking to fish in Indian waters, overtly anti-Muslim policies amount to playing with fire.
The Uttar Pradesh elections gave Mr Modi a strong mandate. But instead of taking that as an opportunity to lift up a backward state, he is opting for rank opportunism. While he called for humility from the BJP after the election, the appointment of Mr Adityanath looks much like hubris. Like Icarus, Mr Modi is flying too close to the sun, seemingly unaware of the grave risks.
If polarisation and strife increase, much-needed investment will not materialise.