Pakistan braces for possible PM ouster
Sharif faces graft allegations in court
ISLAMABAD/KARACHI: A l ooming Supreme Court decision that could disqualify Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif over corruption allegations had the country on edge yesterday, as a drawn-out investigation related to the “Panama Papers” leaks neared a conclusion.
Disqualifying Mr Sharif would leave his party in power, but it would cause intense turmoil at a time when Pakistan is experiencing modest growth and improved security after years of violence, and as the civilian government and powerful military have finally appeared to have come to uneasy terms.
Mr Sharif has denied any wrongdoing, but the Supreme Court agreed to investigate his family’s offshore wealth late last year after opposition leader Imran Khan threatened to stage mass street demonstrations.
The Supreme Court could take a range a of steps.
It could clear the prime minister, or order a further judicial commission of inquiry or even declare him ineligible to hold office, as it did in 2012 with thenPrime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilani over a contempt of court case.
Both the government and opposition expressed confidence yesterday.
“There is no chance that decision will come against our leadership,” Talal Chaudhry a prominent leader of Sharif’s Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz told Geo Television.
“Our government and the entire leadership are performing their duties as per routine.”
Naeem Haque, a spokesman for Mr Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party said he expected the verdict would go against Mr Sharif, but he made clear the opposition would not launch a new street movement if they were disappointed by the ruling.
“Imran Khan has clearly stated that we will accept the decision of the Supreme Court, but we believe that enough evidence has been presented to remove the prime minister and that a verdict should be reached that is based on the evidence,” he said.
In 2014, Mr Khan led a months-long protest that paralysed the government quarter in the capital, Islamabad, after rejecting Mr Sharif’s decisive election win a year earlier.
The case stems from documents leaked from the Panama-based Mossack Fonseca law firm appeared to show that Mr Sharif’s daughter and two sons owned offshore holding companies registered in the British Virgin Islands and used them to buy properties in London.
Mr Sharif told parliament last year that his family wealth was acquired legally in the decades before he entered politics and that no money was siphoned off-shore.
Mr Khan, however, has argued that the prime minister’s lawyers have changed stories on the source of the offshore money several times and that it is up to Mr Sharif to prove the offshore companies were not used for money laundering.