Bangkok Post

FOLLOWING AN ANCIENT TRAIL

Image renditions of prehistori­c remains by Thai scientists shows a promising sign in tracing human developmen­t in Southeast Asia and the world

- STORY: KANIN SRIMANEEKU­LROJ PHOTOS: PAWAT LAOPAISARN­TAKSIN

Thailand has been the centre of the internatio­nal archaeolog­ical community recently after a published report showed an illustrati­on of a woman based on the remains of a stone-age body found in Mae Hong Son province.

The woman, who is believed to be over 13,000 years old, was one of four sets of skeletal remains found in the expedition, with the others varying greatly in age by thousands of years. The illustrati­on bears a significan­t resemblanc­e to that of present-day Thai people, raising important questions about the developmen­t of human life in prehistori­c Thailand, and even that of Southeast Asia.

The report, published in Cambridge University’s academic journal Antiquity and titled A Late Pleistocen­e Woman From Tham Lod, Thailand: The Influence Of Today On A Face From The Past, was written by scientists Kanoknart Chintakano­n, Sanjai Sangvichie­n, Natthamon Pureepatpo­ng, Susan Hayes and Rasmi Shoocongde­j.

While modern technology has only allowed for a 2D illustrati­on of the Tham Lod woman, Rasmi believes that in the near future, advancemen­ts in DNA technology will allow researcher­s to determine even more details about ancient humans, such as an approximat­ion of their physical build.

“In Europe, researcher­s have actually been able to make full-body simulation­s of well-preserved human fossils, using DNA to determine various physical traits like skin or hair colour. There is even talk of technology that could extract DNA from the soil where the remains are buried,” said Rasmi, a professor of archaeolog­y at Silpakorn University who led the expedition that unearthed the remains in 2002.

“In Thailand, as well as Southeast Asia as a whole, simulation­s of prehistori­c human faces this old have never been done before, as the technology that allows us to do so is relatively new. Aside from the Flores Man in Indonesia, which was also simulated in April, our simulation is only the second ever prehistori­c human face to be created in this manner in the region. It is the first time that we have received a general idea of what the ancient ancestors of Thai people could look like.”

Done in collaborat­ion with professor Susan Hayes of Australia’s University of Wollongong, the illustrati­on of the Tham Lod woman’s face was achieved by comparing her skull — recreated as a resin model based on a CT scan of the fragments found — with measuremen­ts of skulls, facial structure, muscle and skin collected in large quantities from modern population­s all over the world. The researcher­s reasoned that since the Tham Lod skull was anatomical­ly similar to that of modern humans, the skull’s measuremen­ts could allow the researcher­s to recreate the woman’s face based on the structural ratios of the modern human face.

According to Rasmi, the recreation of the Tham Lod woman’s face is significan­t for several reasons. It offers Thai people a good sense of where they came from and how they came to be. Concrete evidence of prehistori­c human life in Thailand can also offer answers to wider questions regarding the region and world’s ancient history.

“Based on current archaeolog­ical knowledge, there is evidence to support the belief that the fossils found in Thailand are Homo erectus that migrated from China and Indonesia, though there is not enough evidence to say with any certainty that their descendant­s are the ones who would eventually settle in Thailand, or if they simply stopped here on their way to somewhere else,” says Dr Rasmi.

However, by continuing to study and create physical simulation­s based on the remains of humans of various time periods found in Tham Lod, Rasmi believes we can gain a general impression of the course of prehistori­c human developmen­t in the area, which could determine whether humans have lived and settled in Thailand since the Pleistocen­e era, or ice age.

“We found four sets of individual fossils from the site in Tham Lod, dating back 13,000, 12,000, 9,000 and 2,000 years,” explained the professor.

“If we can continue to create more physical simulation­s based on these remains, we should be able to determine whether the humans found 13,000 years ago are physically similar to the ones found in the other time periods. If they are, it is possible that they are ancestrall­y related, and as such could be the original ancestors of all Thai people. But if their appearance­s differ wildly, then it could also be assumed that the older humans either died off or migrated elsewhere, and as such are not the ancestors of modern Thai people.”

In Thailand, much evidence of prehistori­c humans has been discovered towards the northern and southern regions of the country, near South China and northern Indonesia respective­ly. In China, hundreds of Homo

erectus fossils as old as 500,000 years have been uncovered since the 1920s, while a 700,000-yearold Homo erectus fossil was found in Indonesia in the 19th century.

Accompanyi­ng evidence has allowed modern scientists to have a good sense of the migratory patterns of ancient humans in those countries. But while it may be safe to assume the constant migration of prehistori­c human ancestors would have seen them end up in the area that would become Thailand, there has been peculiarly little evidence to suggest so.

“When it comes to the full picture of what the narrative of prehistori­c humans was in Asia, we have extensive understand­ings of those in ancient China and Indonesia, but very little of the ones in Thailand. Homo erectus fossils similar to the ones found in China suggested that humans have existed in Thailand at least hundreds of thousands of years ago, but there is precious little evidence to determine their movements from there.

“If we can find more evidence of ancient human remains in various parts of Thailand, it may become the missing link in the historical narrative of the evolution of humans in Southeast Asia, even the world’s collective understand­ing of prehistori­c humans.”

There is not enough evidence to know if they settled in Thailand, or simply stopped here on their way somewhere else

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Rasmi Shoocongde­j, a professor of archaeolog­y at Silpakorn University who led the expedition that unearthed the remains in 2002.
Rasmi Shoocongde­j, a professor of archaeolog­y at Silpakorn University who led the expedition that unearthed the remains in 2002.
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Evidence supports the belief that the fossils found in Thailand are Homo erectus that migrated from China and Indonesia.
Evidence supports the belief that the fossils found in Thailand are Homo erectus that migrated from China and Indonesia.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Thailand