Bangkok Post

Trump says he has ‘power’ to pardon

Leader under pressure amid Moscow inquiry

-

NORFOLK: President Donald Trump on Saturday asserted the “complete power to pardon” relatives, aides and possibly even himself in response to investigat­ions into Russia’s meddling in last year’s election, as he came to the defence of Attorney General Jeff Sessions just days after expressing regret about appointing him.

Mr Trump suggested in a series of early morning messages on Twitter that he had no need to use the pardon power at this point but left the option open. Presidents have the authority to pardon others for federal crimes, but legal scholars debate whether a president can pardon himself. Mr Trump’s use of the word “complete” seemed to suggest he did not see a limit to that authority.

“While all agree the U.S. President has the complete power to pardon, why think of that when only crime so far is LEAKS against us,” he wrote on Twitter. “FAKE NEWS.”

The Washington Post reported in recent days that the president and his advisers had discussed pardons as a special counsel intensifie­s an investigat­ion into whether associates of Mr Trump and his campaign conspired with Russia to intervene in the 2016 presidenti­al campaign.

Mr Trump also responded on Saturday to an article by The Post reporting that Mr Sessions may have discussed campaign activities and policy with the Russian ambassador, Sergey Kislyak, last year, despite his public statements to the contrary. In the article, The Post cited intercepte­d communicat­ions between Mr Kislyak and his home office in Moscow. Mr Trump excoriated the newspaper and expressed no concern about his attorney general’s conduct.

“A new INTELLIGEN­CE LEAK from the Amazon Washington Post, this time against A.G. Jeff Sessions,” Mr Trump wrote. “These illegal leaks, like Comey’s, must stop!”

The president was equating the report in The Post, which is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, to a decision by James Comey, whom Mr Trump fired as FBI director, to leak contents of a memo he wrote describing a conversati­on he had with the president. Mr Comey has said the memo was unclassifi­ed and therefore not illegal to disclose.

The message about the Post story was quickly followed by one assailing The New York Times. “The Failing New York Times foiled U.S. attempt to kill the single most wanted terrorist, Al-Baghdadi,” he wrote. “Their sick agenda over National Security.”

Mr Trump did not specify what he meant, but he may have been referring to a Fox News report, a version of which aired about 25 minutes before the president’s tweet, about comments by a top commander at a conference on Friday.

Gen Tony Thomas, head of the military’s Special Operations Command, said at the Aspen Security Forum that US forces were “particular­ly close” to Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the leader of the Islamic State, after a 2015 raid recovered informatio­n about the militant group.

“That was a very good lead,” Mr Thomas said, according to the Fox report. “Unfortunat­ely, it was leaked in a prominent national newspaper about a week later and that lead went dead.”

Fox reported that the general appeared to be referring to a June 2015 report by The Times that said US intelligen­ce agencies had “extracted valuable informatio­n” from the raid. The story reported that US forces had recovered “laptops, cellphones and other materials”, including 4 to 7 terabytes of data. It also said that Mr Baghdadi and other Islamic State leaders had used their wives to pass informatio­n to one another to avoid electronic surveillan­ce.

The Pentagon raised no objections with The Times before the story was published, and no senior US official ever complained publicly about it until now.

The Russian military said last month that it might have killed Mr Baghdadi in an air strike in Syria, but Defence Secretary Jim Mattis said on Friday he believed Mr Baghdadi was still alive. The White House made no comment when asked for clarificat­ion about the president’s tweet.

Mr Trump’s posts came shortly before he flew to Norfolk, Virginia, where he presided over the commission­ing of the USS Gerald Ford, the nation’s newest aircraft carrier.

The Post reported Mr Kislyak told superiors in Moscow that he had discussed campaign-related matters, including policy issues important to Moscow, with Mr Sessions during the campaign, contrary to Mr Sessions’ public assertions. Mr Sessions, who was advising Mr Trump on foreign policy at the time, met at least twice with Mr Kislyak and failed to disclose those contacts during his Senate confirmati­on hearings. After news reports about them were published, he said the meetings were not related to the campaign.

Sarah Isgur Flores, a justice department spokeswoma­n, said in a statement to The Post and other news organisati­ons Mr Sessions “never met with or had any conversati­ons with any Russians or any foreign officials concerning any type of interferen­ce with any campaign or election”. She did not deny Mr Sessions discussed campaign or policy issues more generally with Mr Kislyak.

 ?? REUTERS ?? US President Donald Trump participat­es in the commission­ing ceremony of the aircraft carrier USS ‘Gerald Ford’ at Naval Station Norfolk in Norfolk, Virginia, on Saturday.
REUTERS US President Donald Trump participat­es in the commission­ing ceremony of the aircraft carrier USS ‘Gerald Ford’ at Naval Station Norfolk in Norfolk, Virginia, on Saturday.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Thailand