THE BATTLEGROUND OF EMPIRES
The geographical position of Afghanistan has made it the repeated victim of violent invasion over the course of the past two centuries
When American author James Michener went to Afghanistan to research his work of historical fiction, Caravans, it was 1955 and there were barely any roads in the country. Yet there were already Americans and Russians there, jockeying for influence. Later, the book’s Afghan protagonist would tell a US diplomat that one day both America and Russia would invade Afghanistan, and that both would come to regret it.
Michener’s foresight was uncanny, but perhaps that is not terribly surprising. Afghanistan has long been called the “graveyard of empires” — for so long that it is unclear who coined that disputable term.
In truth, no great empires perished solely because of Afghanistan. Perhaps a better way to put it is that Afghanistan is the battleground of empires. Even without easily accessible resources, the country has still been blessed — or cursed, more likely — with a geopolitical position that has repeatedly put it in someone or other’s way.
In the 19th century, there was the Great Game when the British and Russian empires faced off across its forbidding deserts and mountain ranges. At the end of the 20th century, it was the Cold War when the Soviet and US rivalry played out here in a bitter guerrilla conflict.
And in this century, it is the War on Terror against a constantly shifting Taliban insurgency, with US President Donald Trump promising a renewed military commitment.
Wars of the last three “empires” to invade Afghanistan coincided with the age of photography, leaving a rich record of their triumphs and failures, and an arresting chronicle of a land that seems to have changed little in the past two centuries.
THE BRITISH EMPIRE
Over an 80-year period, the British fought three wars in Afghanistan, occupying or controlling the country in between, and lost tens of thousands of dead along the way. Finally, exhausted by World War I, Britain gave up in 1919 and granted Afghanistan independence.
It is striking how little the rural Afghan landscape has changed between the early 19th and 21st centuries. The mud-walled fortifications of those days can still be seen throughout the country, and some of them are still in use as military facilities today. The fort in Kabul during the British occupation in 1879 looks very much like the famous Qala-i-Jang fortress in northern Afghanistan where the century’s first US combatant, a CIA agent, was killed in 2001.
The insurgents’ dress, and even that of many pro-government militiamen, has changed little from the British period.
One of the books inspired by that period was Flashman, the first in a series of historical novels by Scottish author George MacDonald Fraser. The book’s hilarious eponymous character, Flashman, is a caddish rake and self-described coward who manages to be the lone survivor of the Battle of Gandamack, arguably the British army’s worst defeat. Flashman is, of course, fictional, but he has a thoroughly modern eye when he describes the nature of the British war against the Afghans.
“There were scores of little petty chiefs and tyrants who lost no opportunity of causing trouble in the unsettled times,” Flashman recounts. “Our army prevented any big rising — for the moment, anyway — but it was forever patrolling and manning little forts, and trying to pacify and buy off the robber chiefs, and people were wondering how long this could go on.”
The British lost that Battle of Gandamack, but they were back in the next fighting season exacting vengeance, and eventually defeated the Afghans. It was for many of them a sobering experience.
A British Army chaplain, GR Gleig, who witnessed it, called it “a war begun for no wise purpose, carried on with a strange mixture of rashness and timidity, brought to a close after suffering and disaster, without much glory attached either to the government which directed, or the great body of troops which waged it. Not one benefit, political or military, was acquired with this war.”
SOVIETSTAN
The Soviet Union spent the post-war period pacifying and modernising its Central Asian republics with great success. But it was mistaken in assuming that the same programme could stick in Afghanistan. The Soviets invaded in 1979 to try to quell a brewing civil war and prop up its allies in the Afghan government, and they limped out in 1989.
The Soviets brought schools and roads, civil institutions and freedoms for women. But their occupation was unbearable to a generation of Afghan insurrectionists who declared a holy war and enjoyed the extensive support of the United States, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia.
It was a brutal war, on all sides. Two Steps from Heaven, a novel by Russian writer Mikhail Evstafiev — himself one of the “Afgantsy”, as Soviet veterans of that Afghan war are known — describes a set of arrangements amid perpetual conflict that seem conspicuously familiar today: “As the years passed, numerous military installations grew up on the territory adjacent to the palace. A compound covered several square kilometres. It was guarded assiduously against the Afghans and, as was to be expected, Soviet power reigned supreme in that one specific part of Kabul.”
“The distance between the Afghans and the Soviets was measured in centuries,” Evstafiev wrote. “A man felt safe and secure only inside the garrison, surrounded by barbed wire, tanks and machine guns; fate had strewn Soviet military divisions all over Afghanistan, they were like islands in an ocean, lonely, far from the mainland.”
The Soviets left the Afghan landscape permanently disfigured with the bombed-out husks of tanks, and the earth itself seeded with more mines than anywhere else on the planet. When their client state in Kabul collapsed, what ensued was years of bitter civil war that destroyed many of the cities and led to the rise to power of the Taliban in 1996.
THE AMERICAN CENTURY
The first US military battle of the 21st century was fought in Afghanistan shortly after the events of Sept 11, 2001. After nearly 16 years of fighting a shifting host of militant groups and the new Taliban insurgency, and now even a local affiliate of the Islamic State, there is no clear end on the horizon.
That first battle, fought at the Qala-i-Jangi fort, featured US personnel on horseback, using lasers to guide bombs released from jet aircraft.
Since then more than one million American servicemen and women have served in Afghanistan; 2,400 of them lost their lives, along with another 1,100 Nato and other coalition allies killed. Afghan security forces lose three or four times that number just in a year now; the conflict killed more than 3,000 Afghan civilians in the past year as well. American casualties this year have totalled only 11, most of them Special Operations troops on counter-terrorism missions. Nato casualties: zero.
By 2010, as US military numbers rose to 100,000, American and other coalition troops were in every one of the 34 Afghan provinces, often scattered — as the Soviets had been — in isolated fortresses. Now they are mostly restricted to a few major bases, and their numbers are estimated at around 12,000, including an influx of perhaps another 4,000 from Mr Trump’s military commanders. The Afghan security forces, at the same time, have peaked at around 330,000 — roughly the same size they were during the Soviet period.
Many years after he had researched Caravans, James Michener was asked which country he would most want to revisit. His answer was Afghanistan.
“I remember it as an exciting, violent, provocative place,” Michener wrote. “Almost every American or European who worked there in the old days says the same.”
And nowadays, too, Americans seem committed to return to Afghanistan for years to come.
“We are with you in this fight,” the US military commander, Gen John Nicholson, told Afghans recently. “We will stay with you.”
The US century in Afghanistan is far from over; its book has not been written yet.
I remember [Afghanistan] as an exciting, violent, provocative place. Almost every American or European who worked there in the old days says the same
JAMES MICHENER, AUTHOR