Bangkok Post

Shining a light on Israel’s hidden assassinat­ions

With Rise And Kill First, Ronen Bergman provides a lengthy history of sustained political violence

- JENNIFER SZALAI © 2018 NEW YORK TIMES NEWS SERVICE

Areader might begin a 750-page history of killing committed by Israel’s intelligen­ce services with some trepidatio­n; the tightrope is high, and it’s shaky. Much of the truth is classified — and much of it is in dispute. The moral quandaries are, to put it mildly, enormous.

Ronen Bergman knows this. And from the looks of Rise And Kill First, he knows more than he’s supposed to. In 2011, the Israel Defense Force’s chief of staff accused him of “aggravated espionage”; a historian for the Mossad, Israel’s foreign intelligen­ce agency, told Bergman he would refuse to talk to him even if everybody else did talk to him: “I despise whoever it was who gave you my phone number, just as I despise you.”

Still, Bergman, a journalist based in Israel, managed to conduct a thousand interviews along the chain of command, from political leaders to intelligen­ce operatives. For a subject as contentiou­s and bloody as this one, he leads with some numbers and a brute fact: “Since World War II, Israel has assassinat­ed more people than any other country in the Western world.”

What follows is an exceptiona­l work, a humane book about an incendiary subject. Blending history and investigat­ive reporting, Bergman never loses sight of the ethical questions that arise when a state, founded as a refuge for a stateless people who were targets of a genocide, decides it needs to kill in order to survive.

Of course, such decisions are kept secret. Israel neither confirms nor denies the existence of the targeted assassinat­ion programme that Bergman so assiduousl­y documents. The book’s title comes from the Talmud: “If someone comes to kill you, rise up and kill him first.” This is assassinat­ion defined as self-defence. But as Bergman shows, motives aren’t always so righteous and clear-cut; revenge, wrath and other impulses have ways of sneaking in. Before the establishm­ent of Israel in 1948, Zionist undergroun­d movements employed what they called “personal terror” — a campaign of bombings and killings — against the British, who controlled Palestine and restricted immigratio­n by Jews trying to flee Europe.

“We were too busy and hungry to think about the British and their families,” one assassin told Bergman, recounting how he shot a British officer on a Jerusalem street in 1944. “I didn’t feel anything, not even a little twinge of guilt. We believed the more coffins that reached London, the closer the day of freedom would be.”

Many men who fought in the Zionist undergroun­d later became establishm­ent figures in Israel, including Yitzhak Shamir and Menachem Begin; they imported guerrilla methods into the security apparatus they helped create. Assassinat­ions offered a tactical method for a tiny country with rudimentar­y defences. The Holocaust, Bergman writes, reinforced the sense that the country and its people would be “perpetuall­y in danger of annihilati­on”.

Meir Dagan, the spymaster who led the Mossad from 2002 to 2011, kept a photograph in his office of a bearded man in a prayer shawl, kneeling in front of German troops. Whenever Mossad operatives were about to carry out a particular­ly sensitive mission, he would invite them to his office and explain that the man pictured was his grandfathe­r, shortly before the Nazis murdered him.

“Most of the Jews in the Holocaust died without fighting,” Dagan told Bergman. “We must never reach that situation again, kneeling, without the ability to fight for our lives.”

A number of Bergman’s sources express a version of this sentiment. So pronounced is this line of thinking that others have gone so far as to propose that cowardice kept the Jews from revolting — a statement Primo Levi found “absurd and insulting”. Still, Levi recognised that this premise provided a sense of agency and a way out of despair. What it also did — something Bergman is especially attuned to — is mark the country’s political life from the beginning in terms of existentia­l threats. The hostile regimes surroundin­g Israel have continuall­y stoked such fears; just hours after Israel declared independen­ce in 1948, seven armies from neighbouri­ng countries attacked, and opportunis­tic despots have encouraged terrorism against Israel and its citizens ever since. Extreme measures seem less extreme when it’s a matter of survival.

Despite this historical context, Rise And Kill First, parts of which appeared in The New York Times Magazine, is far from an apologia. If anything, Bergman suggests that Israel’s honed aptitude for clandestin­e assassinat­ions led the country to rely on them to a fault, approachin­g some complex strategic and political concerns as problems that an extrajudic­ial killing could fix. Bergman argues that the assassinat­ion of certain militants — chief among them Khalil al-Wazir, known as Abu Jihad, in 1988 — emboldened ever more radical upstarts and pushed a sustainabl­e resolution with the Palestinia­ns even further out of reach.

“As Israel would learn repeatedly,” Bergman writes, “it is very hard to predict how history will proceed after someone is shot in the head.”

It’s also hard to predict how an operation will unfold. Bergman recounts a number of missions gone very wrong, including one with a booby-trapped dog that ran away (only to be discovered later by Hezbollah), and a hare-brained Manchurian Candidate- like scheme to hypnotise a Palestinia­n prisoner into becoming an assassin for the Mossad. (After he was armed with a pistol and sent on his mission, the man promptly turned himself in to the Palestinia­n police and said the Israelis had tried to brainwash him.)

Another wild card is a belligeren­t Ariel Sharon, who keeps turning up in this book — first as an army commander, then as minister of defence and eventually prime minister. Bergman describes Sharon as a “pyromaniac”, and his obsession with killing Yasser Arafat, the chairman of the Palestine Liberation Organizati­on, as verging on monomaniac­al. In his hunt for Arafat, Sharon almost had the Mossad shoot down a plane of 30 wounded Palestinia­n children by mistake; he even countenanc­ed the downing of a commercial airliner if Arafat were on it. As Bergman bluntly states, this would have amounted to “an intentiona­l war crime”.

But Sharon was just one man, and today there is a bigger institutio­nal problem that Bergman traces, having to do with Israel’s security apparatus getting more technologi­cally savvy and ruthlessly efficient. Instead of taking months or years to plan a single killing, the Mossad and its domestic counterpar­t, Shin Bet, are now capable of planning four or five “intercepti­ons” a day.

“You get used to killing. Human life becomes something plain, easy to dispose of. You spend a quarter of an hour, 20 minutes, on who to kill.” This quote is from Ami Ayalon, who as the head of Shin Bet in the late 90s helped shepherd the organisati­on into the digital age. He also told Bergman: “I call it the banality of evil.”

The irony of Ayalon’s inflammato­ry language — an echo of Hannah Arendt’s line about Nazi functionar­ies — is as pointed as it is jarring. This book is full of shocking moments, surprising disturbanc­es in a narrative full of fateful twists and unintended consequenc­es. As one naval commander says: “Listen, history plays strange games.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Thailand