Bangkok Post

Abbas misses another chance to help Palestinia­ns

- Diana Buttu is a lawyer and a former adviser to the negotiatin­g team of the Palestine Liberation Organisati­on. DIANA BUTTU

On Sept 27, Palestinia­n Authority President and Palestine Liberation Organisati­on (PLO) Chairman Mahmoud Abbas addressed the UN General Assembly for the 14th time. Among Palestinia­ns, expectatio­ns had been high that Mr Abbas’ speech at the United Nations would be “historic”, and that he would articulate a new strategic path forward for Palestinia­ns in the wake of the Trump administra­tion’s near total adoption of Israel’s positions, namely moving the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem, cutting all funding to UNRWA, the UN agency responsibl­e for the well-being of Palestinia­n refugees, and closing the PLO diplomatic mission in the United States.

Yet, once again, Mr Abbas failed to deliver. His “historic” speech turned out to be more of the same: a call for the world to salvage a two-state solution that died years ago, systematic­ally destroyed by Israel as a result of its relentless constructi­on on Palestinia­n land of settlement­s deemed illegal by the United Nations.

This year marks the 25th anniversar­y of the Oslo Accords, which launched peace negotiatio­ns between Israel and the Palestinia­ns. Sold to Palestinia­ns as a short-term process that would end in 1999 with our freedom, the negotiatio­ns process, which Mr Abbas oversaw and championed in 1993, has worsened, not improved, Palestinia­n lives and prospects.

For example, in 1993, there were 250,000 Israeli settlers living in the West Bank and East Jerusalem; today that number exceeds 700,000. As Palestinia­ns are effectivel­y imprisoned behind Israeli military checkpoint­s and walls, the Palestinia­n economy is now entirely dependent on outside sources, namely internatio­nal donors.

Palestinia­n poverty has dramatical­ly increased since 1993. In the Gaza Strip, data shows that the average child under the age of 11 has not only experience­d three military conflicts, but has never seen a day without electricit­y blackouts or exposure to contaminat­ed water. Palestinia­ns in the West Bank dream of seeing the sea while those in Gaza dream of visiting Jerusalem — all denied because of Israel’s restrictio­ns on their freedom of movement. Yet Mr Abbas continues to insist that peace negotiatio­ns with Israel are the only path to liberation — even though they have proven time and again to be the path to our further subjugatio­n.

Equally alarming, Mr Abbas continued to push in his UN speech for internatio­nal recognitio­n of a Palestinia­n state. In Mr Abbas’ mind, pressing for statehood will improve his position in negotiatio­ns; he believes that this will allow Palestinia­ns to negotiate over what their state will look like, instead of being forced to negotiate over statehood itself.

To many this may sound reasonable. Why should the world not recognise Palestine so that Israel will eventually be forced to do the same? Indeed, some will argue that this approach has proved fruitful. Mr Abbas embarked on his recognitio­n initiative seven years ago; since then, 137 UN member states have recognised Palestine

as a sovereign state, and the United Nations has upgraded it to the status of non-member observer state.

Yet, despite all this, the number of countries that recognise Palestinia­n rights remains unchanged. Even if Mr Abbas were successful in getting most of the world’s countries to recognise Palestinia­n sovereignt­y, this would not alter the lived reality for most Palestinia­ns. The real problem is not a lack of recognitio­n, it is that the world has failed to hold Israel sufficient­ly accountabl­e for denying us our freedom.

For five decades, as Israel has built and expanded settlement­s and trampled on the rights of Palestinia­ns, the world has done little more than issue empty condemnati­ons declaring how “unhelpful” Israel’s actions are to achieving a two-state solution. Israel has not faced meaningful sanctions, it is recognised in internatio­nal forums and Israel’s leaders have not been shunned — although they should be. Rather, largely as a result of Mr Abbas’ dual demands — recognitio­n and negotiatio­n — Israel continues to reap the benefits of seeking peace while sowing the seeds of its own version of apartheid.

Mr Netanyahu and his government have made it abundantly clear that they will not allow Palestinia­ns to enjoy freedom or selfdeterm­ination as long as they are in power. And with the recent passage of the nationstat­e law, which enshrines in Israeli law Jewish supremacy over Arab citizens of the state, the government has made it clear that Palestinia­ns with Israeli citizenshi­p will not see equality either.

Instead of pushing for the same failed strategy that he has advocated for a quarter of a century, Mr Abbas should instead have pushed for change. With the Trump administra­tion firmly on side with Israel, and with the vast majority of Palestinia­ns no longer supporting the negotiatio­n process, it is past time for bold moves by Mr Abbas: to make it clear that our rights are not negotiable; to promote support for the growing Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement; to push to hold Israel accountabl­e; and to make it clear that Palestinia­ns will press for equality.

That would have been a truly historic, and visionary speech. Unfortunat­ely, Mr Abbas is not a visionary, and he, like his speeches, will soon be relegated to history.

It is past time for bold moves by Mr Abbas: to make it clear that our rights are not negotiable.

 ?? REUTERS ?? Palestinia­n President Mahmoud Abbas addresses the 73rd session of the United Nations General Assembly at UN headquarte­rs in New York on Sept 27.
REUTERS Palestinia­n President Mahmoud Abbas addresses the 73rd session of the United Nations General Assembly at UN headquarte­rs in New York on Sept 27.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Thailand