Lam warns protesters at uni
Beijing says ruling weakens governance
HONG KONG: About 100 protesters remain holed up inside a university under police siege yesterday, Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam said, while calling on them to swiftly surrender in a bid to bring the days-long standoff with police to an end.
The territory’s chief executive told a news conference that about 600 protesters have left the Hong Kong Polytechnic University campus in the Kowloon area, including about 200 who are under 18 years old.
Ms Lam said the police arrested about 400 demonstrators who had occupied the university. “We very much hope for a peaceful resolution,” Ms Lam told reporters ahead of her weekly Executive Council meeting. “But it is not up to us. If the rioters launch lethal attack, a peaceful resolution is hard to achieve.”
“I cannot give an absolute guarantee because the situation is changing. If we were suddenly seeing some very major, life threatening incidents on the campus, then the police have to take the necessary action to prevent any tragedies from happening,” she said.
BEIJING: China insisted yesterday it alone held the authority to rule on constitutional matters in Hong Kong, as it condemned a decision by the city’s high court to overturn a ban on face masks worn by pro-democracy protesters.
The statement raised hackles among activists in Hong Kong after months of violent protests over concerns that Beijing is chipping away at the autonomy of the financial hub.
The ban on face-covering came into force in October, when the city’s unelected pro-Beijing leader invoked colonial-era legislation for the first time in more than 50 years.
The move was seen as a watershed legal moment for the city since its 1997 return by Britain to China — but has been largely symbolic.
The city’s high court ruled on Monday that the government ban on face masks was unconstitutional. But Beijing said the judicial branch of the special administrative region had overreached.
Zang Tiewei, a spokesman of the National People’s Congress, said only the legislature had the right to rule on whether a law is in accordance with the Basic Law — the city’s mini-constitution.
“No other institution has the right to make judgements or decisions,” Mr Zang said, according to a state media report posted on the NPC’s website.
He said the ruling had “severely weakened the governance” of Hong Kong chief executive Carrie Lam and the city government.
Mr Zang also indicated that the legislature might take some form of action.
“We are considering the relevant opinions and suggestions put forward by some NPC deputies,” he said, without elaborating.
Protests started in June as a peaceful condemnation of a now-shelved China extradition bill, but have morphed into a battle to defend unique freedoms unseen on the mainland, which include freedom of speech and an independent judiciary.
Dennis Kwok, a pro-democracy lawmaker, warned that taking away the power of the courts in Hong Kong “will be the end of one country, two systems” — the policy that governs the city.
“This is not a time to burn down your own house or to destroy the rule of law in Hong Kong,” Mr Kwok said.
“Respect the courts in Hong Kong, respect our system and this is the essence of the one country two systems.”
On Twitter, democracy activist Joshua Wong saw the NPC statement as a warning that it would reinterpret Hong Kong’s constitution.
“When the state loses, she changes the rules of game. Beijing never intends to play by the rules,” Mr Wong said.
China has repeatedly warned that it would not allow the city to spiral into total chaos, fuelling concerns that Beijing might deploy troops to quell the unrest.
China’s ambassador to Britain, Liu Xiaoming, warned on Monday that the central government would not sit idly by if the situation got out of control.
“We have enough resolution and power to end the unrest,” Mr Liu said.
Chinese state media slammed the high court ruling. “This disappointing verdict will encourage radical protesters to do evil and discourage the police from curbing violence,” the nationalist Global Times said in an editorial.
Meanwhile, the People’s Daily accused Western politicians of defending “violent crimes” and “anti-China forces” in Hong Kong. “Violent crime is not only a ‘virus’ that endangers Hong Kong society, but also a public enemy that endangers all mankind,” it said in a commentary yesterday.