Bangkok Post

Slowly moving away from the death penalty

- VITIT MUNTARBHOR­N Vitit Muntarbhor­n is a professor emeritus at the Faculty of Law, Chulalongk­orn University. He has helped the UN in several positions, including as UN Special Rapporteur, UN Independen­t Expert and member of UN commission­s of inquiry on hu

One of the interestin­g developmen­ts in Thailand is that official circles are gradually moving away from the death penalty as a sanction against crimes. This is witnessed by the Ministry of Justice’s campaign to invite the public to look at options beyond the death penalty. What if there is a large proportion of the population in the country which still favours its retention rather than abolition? There is a need to balance with the internatio­nal trend and the country’s obligation­s.

Basically, the internatio­nal position is stipulated by a key human rights treaty to which Thailand is a party: the Internatio­nal Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) (1966). Although this treaty does not prohibit the death penalty absolutely, under its Section 6, it affirms the right to life, with a high threshold if the death penalty is to be legitimate and only where it is imposed by the courts. There is absolute prohibitio­n of the death penalty in regard to children (under 18). The punishment is forbidden in regard to pregnant women. If there is to be the death penalty, it must also only be for the most serious crimes. Extra-judicial killings or killings by officials and other people, as differenti­ated from the death penalty imposed by a court, are totally illegal.

Complement­ary to the ICCPR, the internatio­nal trend is at least to suspend the death penalty with a moratorium and, preferably, to orientate towards its abolition altogether. The said covenant is accompanie­d by an additional treaty known as the protocol to the ICCPR which enjoins its members to abolish the death penalty without exception; Thailand is not yet a party to this protocol. Globally some 140 countries have abolished the death penalty altogether. In the Asean region, Cambodia and the Philippine­s have set a key example by abolishing the death penalty.

Over the past seven decades in Thailand, about 320 people have been executed, the most recent being in 2018. The majority have been men and a number of cases have been related to drug traffickin­g. The Human Rights Committee under the ICCPR has criticised the country for not fully complying with the ICCPR. In particular, it has indicated that drug-related offences are not to be regarded as the most serious crimes which might justify the death penalty. Various human rights bodies have also raised the issue of extra-judicial killings in Thailand.

Some developmen­ts in Thailand in the past two decades reveal stepping stones that need further consolidat­ion. About a decade ago, the Thai criminal code was amended to abolish the death penalty for people under 18 years of age. Thailand’s criminal code now forbids the death penalty in regard to pregnant women. However, there is a peculiar provision that allows the death penalty to be re-imposed on a woman who has given birth to a child — where the child dies before reaching the age of three. This anomaly needs reform to delete the condition mentioned. The country has also abolished the death penalty in regard to the offence of corruption by officials in its amended anti-corruption law. A current draft law on drug-related offences will modify the variety of situations giving rise to the death penalty. If the draft is approved by parliament, the death penalty will be limited to two main categories in regard to listed drugs, namely, against those at the top of the drug-traffickin­g echelons and in regard to national security.

Of course, legal developmen­ts alone are not necessaril­y convincing to a local public who might be seeking retributio­n for major crimes. A broad public awareness and socialisat­ion campaign is also needed to enable the public to understand the complicati­ons surroundin­g the death penalty which might lead to injustices. There have been miscarriag­es of justice that have led to the execution of innocent people over the years. It is better to ensure that an innocent person is protected from the death penalty, even if several culpable persons are exempted from such a sanction in the proceeding­s. Empirical evidence also suggests that the death penalty does not automatica­lly prevent crimes or lead to the reduction of crimes. Moreover, internatio­nal understand­ing of crimes has shifted from a retributio­n-based approach, anchored in revenge, to an approach based on rehabilita­tion and effective remedy for victims. Commutatio­ns to change the sanction from the death penalty to other sanctions should always be a possibilit­y.

In internatio­nal relations, retention of the death penalty leads to negative implicatio­ns for the country. The state should not be involved with the deprivatio­n of life; this is regressive role modelling and internatio­nally, it is viewed negatively. Countries which have abolished the death penalty are likely to refuse to extradite criminals from their territory to Thailand if the death penalty remains in place in the country. Moreover, the shift from execution by gunfire to lethal injection in the country has not led to an improved internatio­nal image. Indeed, countries that produce the chemicals for such lethal injections might sanction the country by refusing their sale and delivery.

What next for Thailand? It should be remembered that today there remain some 60 offences that give rise to the death penalty. About 30 are under the Criminal Code and they range from offences concerning attacks on the monarchy to homicide/murder. About 15 situations fall under military law concerning crimes committed by the military, such as collusion with the enemy.

Another 15 offences fall under various other laws, such as the anti-prostituti­on law, anti-traffickin­g law, offences concerning possession of illegal weapons, aircraft hijacking, and drugrelate­d crimes.

While it might be difficult to abolish the death penalty generally and instantane­ously, gradual abolition is possible, as seen from the reform of laws on economic crimes such as the anti-corruption law and potentiall­y on drugrelate­d offences.

In the meantime, it is imperative to nurture an understand­ing of the preferred direction, moving away from the death penalty to more humane options.

 ?? PATTANAPON­G HIRUNARD ?? A capital punishment advocate holds up a sign while observing a re-enactment of a murder case in Bangkok.
PATTANAPON­G HIRUNARD A capital punishment advocate holds up a sign while observing a re-enactment of a murder case in Bangkok.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Thailand