TERRORISM ARRESTS A NEW HONG KONG PHENOMENON
When Louis Lo was arrested at the height of the 2019 pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong and accused of masterminding the city’s largest bomb plot in decades, authorities chose not to prosecute him for terrorism.
At that time, the city had never charged anyone with trying to carry out a terrorist act under a law passed years earlier. Instead, the independence activist, who the trial judge said sought to create “terror among citizens”, was charged with keeping explosives. He pleaded guilty in April this year and was sentenced to 12 years in prison.
Yet Hong Kong has shown a greater willingness to level terrorism charges since China imposed powerful national security legislation on the city last year. Authorities began using its sweeping provisions to round up members of the opposition, arresting 29 people on terrorism-related allegations in the past 18 months — the first just hours after the security law took effect on June 30, 2020.
Some of the cases involve activities that would probably meet most international definitions of terrorism, such as a group of 14 accused in July of stockpiling explosives to attack public infrastructure.
Others, however, might fall short of such standards, including a waiter sentenced to nine years in prison for driving a motorcycle into a group of police officers, and four university students charged with advocating terrorism for commemorating a man who stabbed a police officer.
The cases have been accompanied by a flurry of warnings by government officials that radicals could be planning more attacks, with Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam in October declaring the “prevention of terrorist activities” a policy priority for 2022.
Meanwhile, the city’s top security official, Chris Tang, ordered authorities to step up vigilance to stop attacks by independence activists, and a new publicity campaign is urging the public to report signs of terrorism.
While the government defends the approach as necessary to prevent a return of the unrest that rocked the city two years ago, the strategy brings risks to an Asian financial hub of 7.4 million people long seen as one of the world’s safest places to live and work.
Not only could the effort deepen worries about Hong Kong’s stability, it could erode faith in city authorities to take an apolitical and measured approach to meting out justice.
“There are concerns about how the national security law will affect Hong Kong’s status as a financial hub and international business and banking destination,” said Lydia Khalil, a research fellow specialising on terrorism at the Sydney-based Lowy Institute.
“And by officials playing up the threat of terrorism, it will impact businesses’ political risk assessments of the territory and their ability to do business there.”
A spokesman for the Hong Kong Security Bureau declined to comment on individual cases, saying in a statement that local law enforcement actions were based on evidence and free from political considerations. Although authorities have no intelligence suggesting a likely attack, they cannot rule out the threat that “radical or violent extremists” might launch one in the future, the spokesman said.
Pamphlets are being stuffed into mailboxes telling residents how to spot terrorism. Posters warning passengers to “run, hide and report” violent attacks are plastered across tram cars. Counter-terrorism exercises have been held at the airport and rail stations. School children were introduced to bomb disposal units and allowed to handle replica guns at this year’s National Security Education Day.
The warnings mark a departure for Hong Kong, where incidents of politically motivated violence had been relatively rare since a leftist-led uprising against the British colonial government in the 1960s.
Until September, the government had never used the anti-terrorism ordinance it enacted in 2002 in the wake of the Sept 11 attacks in the US. And authorities have kept the official terrorism threat level at “moderate” since 2003.
The decision to prosecute Louis Lo for a non-political offence — possessing explosives with intent to endanger life or property — was consistent with that more restrained approach. During the sentencing hearing, Justice Andrew Chan said the member of the pro-independence National Front group came close to “declaring war” on Hong Kong and sought to create “terror among citizens”.
“Governments around the world often seek to label their political enemies as terrorists, and now the Hong Kong government is no exception,” said Thomas Kellogg, executive director of the Center for Asian Law at Georgetown University in Washington DC.
Hong Kong’s counterparts on the mainland have long invoked the threat of terrorism to justify crackdowns against groups seeking greater political autonomy in places such as Xinjiang and Tibet.
Mainland officials led the way in extending the term to Hong Kong’s dissidents, with then-Liaison Office director Zhang Xiaoming denouncing participants in a 2016 riot as “radical separatists” who were “inclined toward terrorism”.
Hong Kong authorities now appear to be adopting Beijing’s playbook, said Steven Tsang, director of the China Institute at SOAS University of London.
“Hong Kong people, even though they aren’t a minority, they have to be brought in line,” Tsang said. “You use the label of ‘terrorism’ as a way to do that, so they know how harsh a punishment awaits them if they cross it.”
While the term terrorism implies an intent to create widespread fear, more than half of the 29 arrested by Hong Kong have been accused of supporting violence against police officers, according to data compiled by Bloomberg News. At least 12 of those arrested were age 19 or younger at the time of their detention.
The security law handed down by Beijing last year includes a broad definition of terrorism, including “serious interruption” of public services and “other dangerous activities which seriously jeopardise public health, safety or security”.
The law carries sentences as long as life in prison and gives authorities the power to deny suspects bail or a jury trial or transfer the case to mainland courts.
Of the 29 terrorism-related arrests, 28 have come in the past six months. Authorities stepped up warnings about the threat after an activist stabbed a police officer and then committed suicide by stabbing himself in the chest.
In subsequent weeks, police charged four members of the University of Hong Kong student council with advocating terrorism over a motion the body passed paying tribute to the man who stabbed the officer.
Police also announced arrests of members of pro-independence group, Returning Valiant, accusing them of producing explosives and recruiting students with the intent to attack transport facilities.
Still, the arrests haven’t yet changed the government’s official assessment that threat remains “moderate.”
The discrepancy between the official alert level and the rise in arrests stems from Hong Kong’s expansion of the definition of terrorism to include all anti-government violence, said Raffaello Pantucci, a senior fellow at the S Rajaratnam School of International Studies at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore.
“After the national security law, they are going after all those who act on violence and those who appear to support it because, ‘That way, we’ll stomp on this problem,” he said.