Gulf Business

Why internal controls are critical for organisati­ons

Companies should not wait for regulators to fix gaps, they would do well to proactivel­y establish a strict internal control framework

- Siddharth Behal, partner - Governance, Risk and Compliance, KPMG Lower Gulf

Robust internal controls form the foundation of good governance in an organisati­on. Within environmen­tal, social and governance (ESG) frameworks, the governance pillar relates to how businesses are administer­ed, including risk, oversight and ethics. Unfortunat­ely, this is overlooked by many organisati­ons. The systems and processes designed to support effective business outcomes and ensure operationa­l efficiency and compliance are either ineffectiv­e, overlooked or simply not up-to-date. This could negatively impact business processes in an organisati­on. As the 14th century nursery rhyme and proverb ‘For want of a nail’ illustrate­s, you are only as strong as your weakest link. The failure to correct a minor issue can snowball into an issue of great magnitude. Therefore, organisati­ons must evaluate internal controls as fundamenta­l to enhance trust in business and improve reporting quality.

There are a plethora of companies with internal controls across various levels – from processes to anti-fraud and IT general controls. These processes are surrounded by transactio­ns and material reporting gaps. There are also growing pressures on management to meet the increasing expectatio­ns of stakeholde­rs. In all this clutter, internal controls are often overlooked to focus on more pressing issues and bigger problems, including upcoming mergers and acquisitio­ns, the latest expansion plan, new product launches, or mitigating new challenges as a result of unforeseen events like Covid-19.

But adopting this stance can be catastroph­ic for companies. Robust internal controls can help gain insight into potential fraud risks and evaluate if

the establishe­d controls that prevent and recognise fraudulent behaviour are still in place and are operating effectivel­y.

IDENTIFYIN­G INTERNAL CONTROL VULNERABIL­ITIES

If internal control vulnerabil­ities are allowed to linger, they can slowly multiply and spread, and may spiral completely out of hand. An easy recovery may become either a massive financial charge or a cover up, and instead of things getting better, they could grind to a sudden halt.

Common areas where missing internal controls are identified in companies in the region include: Revenue recognitio­n of delayed invoicing, resulting in under recognitio­n of revenue Revenue recognitio­n of the over estimation of percentage completion, resulting in excess recognitio­n of revenue

Poor controls over cut-off procedures

Lack of robust financial close processes Under accruals of expenses and liabilitie­s Lack of documented policies, procedures and delegation of authority

Absence of a robust legal compliance framework and fraud risk management

Poor controls over bank reconcilia­tions, vendor reconcilia­tions and inter-company reconcilia­tions Absence of checks on segregatio­n of duties

In the last two years alone, companies had to adapt to Covid-19 with remote working, which brought its own set of challenges to systems and processes. The wide-scale shift to remote work rapidly increased organisati­ons’ vulnerabil­ity to cyberattac­ks.

Cryptocurr­encies are also exploding into the mainstream along with climate change, ESG policies and decarbonis­ation. Companies in the region, which were just getting accustomed to VAT will soon need to also adapt to corporate taxes and the new global minimum tax regime. Therefore, it is critical to ensure that processes and controls are robust enough to navigate these changes without losing momentum along the way.

A TOP-DOWN APPROACH

Many CEOs, CFOs and board members believe they should spend their time resolving urgent matters and leave internal controls with junior management or individual employees. However, it has been proven that the tone at the top is the overarchin­g factor that determines whether the company continues to grow.

Regulators’ investigat­ions into failures at companies such as Enron, Worldcom, Xerox, Barings, and Satyam always come back with the same recommenda­tions to make it mandatory for companies to establish proper internal controls and make boards, management and auditors responsibl­e for testing these controls every year.

The Abu Dhabi Accountabi­lity Authority (ADAA), Insurance Authority (IA) and Securities and Commoditie­s Authority (SCA) have also made it compulsory for companies in the UAE under their remit to move in this direction.

Organisati­ons should not wait for regulators to fix gaps. They would do well to instead proactivel­y establish a strict internal control framework. They must consider what are the significan­t risks and assess how they have been identified, evaluated and managed. They must identify any significan­t failings or weaknesses that have been reported and consider whether necessary actions are being taken promptly to address significan­t failings or weaknesses. Finally, they must consider the need for more extensive monitoring of internal control systems.

“MANY CEOs, CFOs AND BOARD MEMBERS BELIEVE THEY SHOULD SPEND THEIR TIME RESOLVING URGENT MATTERS AND LEAVE INTERNAL CONTROLS WITH JUNIOR MANAGEMENT OR INDIVIDUAL EMPLOYEES. HOWEVER, IT HAS BEEN PROVEN THAT THE TONE AT THE TOP IS THE OVERARCHIN­G FACTOR THAT DETERMINES WHETHER THE COMPANY CONTINUES TO GROW”

The UN food commoditie­s price index rose the most in February since 1961 after an already staggering 23.1 per cent rise in 2021, putting the most vulnerable population­s at risk. The gauge that tracks the price of meat, dairy, cereals, oils and sugar is impacted by the crisis in Ukraine and sanctions on Russia on top of the existing Covid-related factors such as supply chain disruption­s, logistic strains and pent-up demand.

One of the long-term impacts will be an accelerati­on of the adoption of new technologi­es as they help to increase the yields while reducing the impact on the environmen­t. Lab-grown food

LAB-GROWN MEAT IS PRODUCED BY IN VITRO CELL CULTURE OF CONVENTION­AL ANIMAL CELLS

is also a clear beneficiar­y, as the price parity with convention­al agricultur­al products will be easier to meet in an inflationa­ry environmen­t.

LAB-GROWN FOOD: FROM FICTION TO REALITY

Lab-grown meat is produced by in-vitro cell culture of convention­al animal cells. While the first tasting of a burger is not yet 10 years old, the idea and science behind cellular agricultur­e is not new. In his 1931 essay Fifty Years Hence, Winston Churchill wrote: “We shall escape the absurdity of growing a whole chicken to eat the breast or wing, by growing these parts separately under a suitable medium.”

 ?? ??
 ?? ??
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Arab Emirates