US-Israeli ties have become more complicated
The value of Oren’s ‘maddeningly partial’ book may lie in the fact that it reflects a view genuinely held by many Israelis
The divide between American Jews and their Israeli counterparts is expanding nowadays, prompted lately by the publication of Ally: My Journey Across the American Israeli Divide, authored by the former Israeli ambassador to the United States. Michael B. Oren. He is a close ally of the extreme right-wing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and has lately been elected as a member of the Israeli parliament, known as the Knesset. A severe slap in the face came from a former key assistant of President Barack Obama’s Middle East team, Philip Gordon, who is now a senior fellow at the Washington-based Council on Foreign Relations. As the former White House coordinator for the Middle East, North Africa and the Gulf region since 2013, he seemed stunned by Oren’s “surprisingly and maddeningly partial book”, the so-called “point person for Israel” wrote in a sharply critical review of Oren’s book published in the New York Times last Sunday.
Gordon underlined: “This unique partnership, based on shared history, common values, strategic interests and domestic politics, has become even more complicated in recent years as differences between the two countries have escalated.” In other words, the headline on the jump page spells out the issue: “Oren tells only half the story — Israel’s half.” According to Obama’s onetime top aide, “the value of the book is that it reflects a view genuinely held by many Israelis”. Surprisingly, their point is “that the Obama administration, naively seeking to repair US ties to the Muslim world and failing to appreciate Israel’s value to the United States, broke with decades of US policy towards the region by systematically siding with the Palestinians and seeking a reconciliation with Iran”.
Straightforward actions
Oren’s view is that “Obama broke with a long-standing principle that there should never be ‘daylight’ in the relationship” between the US and Israel. Here Gordon, probably to the surprise of many in the Middle East, cited several straightforward actions by all US presidents since the founding of Israel. For example, Eisenhower “slammed Israel for the 1956 Suez operation and forced it in a humiliating retreat; Gerald Ford froze arms deliveries and announced reassessment of the relationship as a way of pressing Israel to withdraw from the Sinai; Jimmy Carter clashed repeatedly with prime minister Menachem Begin before, during and after the 1978 Camp David summit”.
He went on: “Ronald Reagan denounced Israel’s strike on the Osirak nuclear reactor in Iraq and enraged [Israel] by selling surveillance planes to Saudi Arabia; George H.W. Bush blocked loan guarantees to Israel over ... [colonies]; Bill Clinton clashed publicly with Israel over the size of the proposed West Bank withdrawals; George W. Bush called for a ... [colony] freeze in the 2002 road map for peace and afterwards repeatedly criticised Israel for [illegal] construction in the [Israeli-occupied] West Bank. In other words, Oren has a point — except in the case of virtually every Republican and Democratic US administration since Israel’s founding.”
A shot in the arm came from the United Church of Christ in Cleveland, Ohio, which overwhelmingly voted last Tuesday to approve a resolution calling for concrete action towards a just peace between Israelis and Palestinians. The resolution also included divestments from specific companies that profit from the occupation.This turnaround raises hopes that the Obama administration would henceforth be more serious about starting the ball rolling in its last year in office encouraging all parties to negotiate a final Palestinian-Israeli settlement.