Trump’s Congress speech devoid of substance

He talked in a more reasoned fashion about immigration, but there were no real details about policy matters

n the positive side, United States President Donald Trump’s speech began with a long overdue condemnation of the anti-Semitic attacks across America and the shooting in Kansas. He did not repeat his claim from a press briefing earlier in the day that desecration at Jewish cemeteries may have been the work of people who wanted to make him look bad. The speech was not as gloomy or sinister as his inaugural address. (“A new national pride is sweeping across our nation.”) There was no message about “carnage”. And he did not rail at the press. So he did not feed the narrative that he is unstable or plagued by paranoid delusions.

He framed the speech as a look ahead to the 250th anniversary of the country’s founding. (“What will America look like as we reach our 250th year? What kind of country will we leave for our children? I will not allow the mistakes of recent decades past to define the course of our future.”) This was, by far, the most presidential we have seen him.

He also talked in a more reasoned fashion about immigration. “I believe that real and positive immigration reform is possible, as long as we focus on the following goals: To improve jobs and wages for Americans, to strengthen our nation’s security, and to restore respect for our laws,” he said. “If we are guided by the well-being of American citizens then I believe Republicans and Democrats can work together to achieve an outcome that has eluded our country for decades.” What that would entail is far from clear, especially because his base is opposed to any comprehensive immigration reform. (Unfortunately, he also fanned the myth that immigrants disproportionately commit more crimes, choosing to single them out with a special office within the Department of Homeland Security.)

By far the most dramatic moment came with a call-out to the widow of slain Navy SEAL William “Ryan” Owens. Tearing and looking upward, she received extended applause from the entire audience.

Entirely devoid of fortune-cookie-like substance, the admonitions sounded like time fillers to extend the speech to an acceptable length. With too many clunkers like “Think of the marvels we can achieve if we simply set free the dreams of our people,” it’s evident he really needs a presidentialcaliber speechwriter.

Raising expectations

Trump has been president for about 40 days, but he sounds like he is still giving stump speeches. Alas, on health-care policy he largely repeated campaign promises. “I am also calling on this Congress to repeal and replace Obamacare with reforms that expand choice, increase access, lower costs and, at the same time provide better health care.” Well, the issue is how to do that, and there was no indication he had any idea how to approach the issue. The only items he listed were protection for preexisting conditions (how, he did not say), health spending accounts, litigation reform and flexibility for governors. That’s it. Nothing was mentioned about how people will buy insurance without Obamacare subsidies. Even more cringe-worthy, he continued to raise expectations to new, unattainable heights. (“Everything that is broken in our country can be fixed. Every problem can be solved. And every hurting family can find healing, and hope.”)

While devoid of particulars, there were some intriguing lines about foreign policy: “The only long-term solution for these humanitarian disasters is to create the conditions where displaced persons can safely return home and begin the long process of rebuilding. America is willing to find new friends, and to forge new partnerships, where shared interests align.” That, perhaps, suggests a more engaged and collaborative foreign policy than he’s described before. (However, he might not, then, want to cut the US State Department budget by 37 per cent, as he suggested earlier today.) He also gave a shoutout to Nato and even to democracy.

So, if you were looking for real details about policy matters, you no doubt were disappointed. Most critically, GOP members of Congress got little sense as to what the president would and would not accept as an Obamacare replacement. That means they’ll be flying blind, hoping to reach consensus that won’t be so unpopular with voters that Trump turns on his own party members. One cannot overemphasize how strange it is that the White House is providing no cover, let alone direction, on arguably the most important aspects of its own agenda.

Happy talk and mindless phrases, of course, leave Trump with wiggle room to blame Democrats or Republicans, or both, when things don’t work out, but it makes success on complex and controversial issues much more difficult.

Jennifer Rubin writes the Right Turn blog for the Washington Post, offering reported opinion from a conservative perspective.