Why Canada is reluctant to party
The country’s reluctance to celebrate itself is actually something worth celebrating. It’s doing well enough that it doesn’t require spackled vanity
uly 1 is Canada’s 150th anniversary, but nobody seems particularly eager to join the party. The muted attempts at celebration have so far produced either awkwardness or embarrassment. A giant rubber duck, six storeys tall, is supposed to arrive in Toronto Harbour on Canada Day, but its imminent appearance has been greeted by outrage over costs and suspicions of plagiarism. In March, the CBC, Canada’s national broadcaster, began televising a documentary series called The Story of Us to the almost instantaneous howling of Quebec and Nova Scotia politicians at what they regarded as significant omissions in our supposedly collective narrative. Resistance 150, an indigenous political movement, is planning to disrupt the anniversary itself. The principal excitement of the sesquicentennial so far has been the fury of national self-critique it has inspired.
The irony is that Canada, at the moment, has a lot to celebrate. The prime minister is glamorous and internationally recognised as a celebrity of progressive politics. Canadians are among the last societies in the West not totally consumed by loathing of others. Canada leads the Group of 7 countries in economic growth. Its cultural power is real: Drake recently had 24 songs on the Billboard Hot 100 at the same time — for one shining moment he was nearly a quarter of popular music. Frankly, it’s not going to get much better than this for little old Canada. So why is Canada so bad at celebrating itself? The nationalism that defined the country during the last major anniversary, the centenary in 1967, has evaporated. The election of Justin Trudeau as prime minister has brought a new generation to power, a generation raised on a vision of history more critical than laudatory. Canadians dream of reconciliation with the victims of their ancestors’ crimes rather than memorialisation of their triumphs.
No hint of populism
Trudeau has described the country he leads as “the first postnational state,” with “no core identity, no mainstream.” He may be right. But if Canada is a postnational state, then why are we even mentioning the formation of a national state in the first place? It seems so arbitrary. Nonetheless, I will be celebrating. The British North America Act, which I was forced to study in school and which, at the time, I considered the single most boring object ever produced by human consciousness, has grown on me. Maybe I’ve aged. But so has the world. Confederation was an attempt at compromise between peoples within a unified political framework. In this way at least, a mouldy 19th-century document has, oddly, prepared Canada for the 21st century surprisingly well. Nationally, Canada has been spared the populism that has swallowed the rest of the western world because there is not, and has never been, such a thing as a “real Canadian.” Pierre Trudeau, Justin’s father, articulated Canada’s difference from other countries perfectly: “There is no such thing as a model or ideal Canadian,” he said when he was prime minister in 1971. “What could be more absurd that the concept of an ‘all Canadian’ boy or girl? A society which emphasises uniformity is one which creates intolerance and hate.”
Colonised self-loathing seems to be a national trait we will never fully shake off. Canadian self-flagellation results always in the same warm, comfortingly smug sense of virtue. Self-righteousness is to Canada what violence is to America. It transcends the political spectrum. Whether it is Conservative insistence on frugality and smalltown values or the furious outrage of identity politics on the left, everyone has the same point to make: We’re not as good as we think we are, and the government should do something about it. None of what I have written should be taken to imply that Canadians don’t love their country, or that I don’t love my country. I do. Most Canadians do, too. They just love it quietly. They don’t want to make a big fuss. Britain made a big fuss with Brexit and look what’s happening to it. America at the moment seems full of dedicated, flag-waving patriots who love their country passionately, vociferously; they just can’t stand their fellow citizens or their government.
Canada’s reluctance to celebrate itself is actually something worth celebrating. It has become abundantly clear in 2017 that patriotism is for losers. Patriotism is for people and for countries that need to justify their existence through symbols rather than achievements. Canada is doing well enough that it doesn’t require spackled vanity. It doesn’t need six-storey-high rubber ducks.
This is the most Canadian thing I will ever write, I know, but I’m proud of my country for its lack of pride.
Stephen Marche is the author, most recently, of The Unmade Bed: The Messy Truth About Men and Women in the TwentyFirst Century. Twitter: @StephenMarche
www.gulfnews.com/opinions