Gulf News

Stringent steps will help clean the air

Delhi residents feel the top court should follow this ruling up by preventing noise pollution as well

- BY KARUNA MADAN Correspond­ent

The Indian Supreme Court’s (SC) ban, which responds to petitions flagging deadly pollution in the national capital, means that firecracke­rs will not be sold in Delhi on Diwali next Thursday. But those who had already bought firecracke­rs can still burst them.

Many feel the SC has given a good decision allowing people to breathe clean and pollution-free air.

“If we want our future generation­s to live peacefully and healthy, then we need to take stringent measures now. Celebratin­g festivals is good but not at the cost of public health. Firecracke­rs pollute the already polluted city more. There is no need to make a hue and cry if firecracke­rs are banned,” says civil rights activist Rajiv Mittal, 39.

Architect Manoranjan Sinha, 28, believes the apex court should follow it up with preventing noise pollution by banning the use of loud speakers during festivals.

“I think it is high time that the Supreme Court altogether banned all harmful things like firecracke­rs, cigarettes, alcohol, loud speakers etc. Loud speakers particular­ly have become a nuisance with their daily cacophony. Why just limit fireworks?” asks Sinha.

There are others who feel the judgement is “an overindulg­ence by the apex court”.

“By first banning Jallikattu [in Tamil Nadu] and bursting of crackers on Diwali, the Supreme Court is targeting Hindu festivals one after the other. It is now getting into the homes of Hindus and invading their traditions and culture. Why does not it ban cracker bursting during marriages and other celebratio­ns? Why does not it ban chemical and pharma companies from being establishe­d close to residentia­l areas?” asks civil engineer Anirudh Kashyap, 46.

“The world over, in hundreds of countries, people burn crackers on Christmas and New Year but the way the Supreme Court banned firecracke­rs on Diwali in the name of pollution is disgusting. More so as it ignores the pollution caused due to animal sacrifice by followers of a particular religion,” says 25-year-old software engineer Neeraj Kapoor.

However, the majority still feels the SC judgement must be respected. “Be sensible and understand your responsibi­lity. Diwali is a festival of prayers, lights and feasting and not of crackers. Period. No festival should be allowed to be celebrated in a way that it causes noise, air and water pollution. Period. Enough of your Hindu and Muslim crying. Be Indian, and respect your environmen­t and the judgement of the land,” says interior designer Shikha Sharma, 36.

“The top court has just banned crackers. Is there nothing else in the festival of Diwali — prayers, parties with friends and relatives, food and sweets, dresses, lights, and more? All that has become suddenly irrelevant,” he said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Arab Emirates