Gulf News

Big Brother is calling you

LONDON’S ICONIC PHONE BOXES GET HIGH-TECH UPGRADE, PROMPTING FEARS OF SURVEILLAN­CE

- LONDON BY BENJAMIN MUELLER

The British telephone box is not dead yet. In parts of central London, a box stands sentinel every 30 metres — and if phone companies got their way, they’d plant one every 15 metres.

But these are not the red cast-iron cubicles that for generation­s were emblems of Britain. Instead, critics say, they are eyesores, covered in digital ad screens and capable of being turned into surveillan­ce posts.

Worst of all, perhaps, some are being imported from New York.

The result is a battle over Britain’s public space, waged between local city planners and telecommun­ications firms. The most contentiou­s fight is in Westminste­r, in the heart of London, where new phone kiosks are being squished between constructi­on barriers and bus stops on crowded streets.

The classic red booths, with domed roofs and moulded royal crowns, were rendered obsolete by the rise of mobile phones. Yet, phone companies never relinquish­ed their rights to the sidewalk.

Under British rules that have effectivel­y been in place since before the iPhone existed, phone boxes are still considered vital infrastruc­ture, and companies with proper licences can keep building them so long as local councils cannot credibly object to the particular site or design. And so the phone companies set about to put up a new kind of booth: two-sided digital displays with internet connectivi­ty and touchscree­n maps that flash craft beer and credit card ads — and also have a phone attached.

“A lot of them are advertisin­g totems with a telephone handset on it,” said John Walker, director of planning for Westminste­r City Council. “They’re just a blot on the landscape.”

Some councils are being flooded with phone box proposals at numbers 900 per cent higher than a few years ago, according to an associatio­n of councils in England and Wales.

Companies have submitted proposals for 300 new and replacemen­t kiosks in the last two years in Westminste­r alone, where the boxes already stand six to a block on a stretch of busy Edgware Road.

Calls to change law

The councils are lobbying the central government to change the law.

Critics call the profusion of high-tech, advertisin­g centric booths—kiosks, in the new parlance of phone companies — one piece of a broader sell-off of Britain’s public space.

The phone boxes passed from public into private hands in the 1980s when British Telecom was privatised under Margaret Thatcher and its monopoly over the booths ended.

Now, with austerity measures slashing maintenanc­e budgets and leaving streets gashed with potholes, councils are also contending with proposals for what they call glorified billboards.

Some of the proposals in Westminste­r are for traditiona­l booths with a wall for advertisin­g. Others, like the New York imports, called InLink kiosks, are sleeklooki­ng internet-connected posts with touchscree­n maps and electronic signs that flash at passers-by while also, privacy advocates say, harvesting data from their phones. They’re a collaborat­ion between BT, the descendant of British Telecom; Intersecti­on, a smart cities firm with links to Google’s parent company, Alphabet; and an outdoor advertisin­g giant.

Planning documents say the InLink kiosks are expected to be able to “anonymousl­y monitor” things like “pedestrian movement,” raising concern that they can follow anyone whose phone passes within Wi-Fi range. The kiosks also come equipped with cameras, though BT says they have not yet been turned on. “The infrastruc­ture for building a surveillan­ce network is being installed on British streets,” said Adrian Short, a data analyst who has built a web portal to track InLink applicatio­ns. “And councils either don’t have or don’t feel they have the right to refuse them.”

The new boxes would join or, in some cases, replace a hodgepodge of grimy 1990s-era phone boxes already on the street.

And because each of London’s 33 local authoritie­s deals separately with planning, it falls to teams of local planners to sift through stacks of phone box proposals.

Walker said they arrive at his Westminste­r office in paper stacks dozens at a time, sometimes just before the Christmas holiday. Then the clock starts ticking: 56 days until, in the absence of an objection from the council, the phone company has the right to start work.

Laborious process

Establishi­ng credible objections is a laborious process, forcing planners to solicit input from nearby businesses and traffic specialist­s.

The phone companies often promise to remove two 1990s-era boxes for every new one they add, but Walker said Westminste­r did not want any, period.

Matthew Carmona, a professor of planning and urban design at University College London, said the situation “has, in a way, caught policymake­rs by surprise.” After removing phone boxes that fell into disuse with the rise of mobile phones, he said, “the phone companies have realised they can make money from them in a different way, and in doing that they can bypass any regulation­s.”

By replacing old booths with internet-connected kiosks, the phone companies say they are declutteri­ng streets and giving Britons and tourists alike modern tools for navigating the city, resulting in more calls and frequent use of the touch screens. Neil Scoresby, BT’s general manager for pay phones and InLink, said the company complied with planning laws and, on occasion, agreed to remove a box a council didn’t want.

InLink said the company only stores unique identifier­s for people’s phones after they sign up for the service and does not currently track pedestrian movement.

Westminste­r City Council has rejected around 175 applicatio­ns for additional or replacemen­t phone boxes over the past two years. But the phone companies can appeal to a government planning inspector to erect them anyway.

Now, the Westminste­r council is seeking broader powers. It filed a claim in the High Court of Justice in August seeking to force the planning inspector to consider, beyond the site and appearance of new boxes, whether there was a need for them.

A lot of them are advertisin­g totems with a telephone handset on it. They’re just a blot on the landscape.”

John Walker | Director of planning for Westminste­r City Council

 ??  ?? London is being flooded with new phone boxes. Critics say they are basically glorified billboards, but planning laws treat them as an essential utility.
London is being flooded with new phone boxes. Critics say they are basically glorified billboards, but planning laws treat them as an essential utility.
 ??  ?? Under British rules that have effectivel­y been in place since before the iPhone existed, phone boxes are still considered vital infrastruc­ture.
Under British rules that have effectivel­y been in place since before the iPhone existed, phone boxes are still considered vital infrastruc­ture.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Arab Emirates