Gulf News

SEE ALSO THE VIEWS

Republican McConnell and his ilk must be delighted: they’ve waged a decades-long campaign to stack the US courts with conservati­ve ideologues

- By Richard Wolffe ■ Richard Wolffe, a columnist for The Guardian, is the author of Renegade: The Making of a President.

Brett Kavanaugh is the symptom, not the cause, of our sickness. He is the nasal congestion snorted out by the politics that have plagued us for the best part of three decades. If we’re ever going to recover our health and sanity, we need to start with the correct diagnosis.

For all the justified outrage about sexual assault, involving allegation­s that Kavanaugh denied, the new supreme court justice represents an even bigger lie than his mindless fabricatio­ns about “ralphing” and “boofing”. He can blame his weak stomach if he likes; the rest of us are heaving at the sight of a generation-long confidence trick suckering an entire democracy. It’s hard to believe that Mitch McConnell, the wily Republican leader of the Senate, has fought so hard and so long for his legacy to be such wonderfull­y impartial and apolitical judges. But don’t take my word for it; take his.

“This project ... is the most important thing that the Senate and an administra­tion of like mind — which we ended up having — could do for the country,” he told Politico. “Putting strict constructi­onists, relatively young, on the courts for lifetime appointmen­ts is the best way to have a long-term positive impact on America. And today is a seminal moment in that effort.”

Ah yes, “strict constructi­onists.” Them’s fancy words for conservati­ve ideologues who get jobs as judges. They emerged in opposition to the clearly crazy supreme court that voted unanimousl­y against segregatio­n in Brown v Board of Education.

There’s no meaningful definition of this jurisprude­nce, but there is a political understand­ing that it is opposed to “activist judges” who are entirely — and astonishin­gly — all liberals. In the words of George W. Bush, Kavanaugh’s former boss and protector, it’s pretty clear who fits the bill. When asked what kind of supreme court justices he’d nominate, back when he was running for president in 2000, Bush said simply: “I don’t believe in liberal activist judges. I believe in strict constructi­onists.”

That was something of a sick joke when the conservati­ve activists on the supreme court decided to end the recount of votes cast for Bush and Gore just two months later, thus handing Bush the presidency.

This is the polar opposite of an impartial, apolitical judiciary. And it’s why McConnell has no shame in talking about a project of like-minded political hacks, re-tooling the judiciary for political purposes far beyond their elected terms. Whatever this is, it isn’t democracy. To justify this judicial coup over the last several weeks and decades, the entire Republican party needed to engage in extensive doublespea­k. It was the Democrats who were playing politics with the supreme court, trying to delay the Kavanaugh nomination until the elections. It wasn’t the Republican­s, who delayed president Barack Obama’s nomination of Merrick Garland for the best part of a year until, um, the 2016 election.

Brett Kavanaugh was the victim of a political assault, while the victim of the sexual assault — Dr Christine Blasey Ford — was part of a conspiracy of aggressors.

It was Kavanaugh who put this best when he shed his judicial robes before the Senate judiciary committee last week. “Boy, you all want power. God, I hope you never get it,” yelled Lindsey Graham, the lickspittl­e Republican senator, as he turned on his Democratic opponents in front of the poor, helpless Judge Kavanaugh. Graham was so hot and bothered about stopping power-hungry politician­s that he needed to be super power-hungry himself. “I hope the American people can see through this sham,” he said.

Making sense of Collins’ vote

A sham it certainly was. The FBI background check into Kavanaugh was so heavily curtailed by the Trump White House that it served as a cover-up: a fig leaf to protect vulnerable senators from embarrassm­ent. One of those was the Maine Republican, Susan Collins, a self-styled moderate, who pretzelled herself trying to make sense of her own vote to confirm Kavanaugh. The judge, she said, was endorsed by the American Bar Associatio­n, preferring to ignore the fact that the ABA said it was re-evaluating that whole endorsemen­t thing because Kavanaugh had acted bonkers in the hearing last week. Collins, like so many other seemingly sympatheti­c Republican­s, said she believed Dr Ford’s testimony. She just didn’t actually believe her. “I believe that she is a survivor of a sexual assault and that this trauma has upended her life,” Collins said earnestly. “Neverthele­ss, the four witnesses she named could not corroborat­e any of the events of that evening gathering where she says the assault occurred.” “The supreme court must never be viewed as a partisan institutio­n,” wrote the man who claimed he was the victim of a vast left-wing conspiracy. “The justices do not sit on opposite sides of an aisle. They do not caucus in separate rooms. I would be part of a team of nine, committed to deciding cases according to the constituti­on and laws of the United States. I would always strive to be a team player.”

Yes, we know, Justice Kavanaugh. You told Democrats last week “what goes around comes around”. You’re the best team player the conservati­ve movement could wish for, and that’s exactly why they fought so hard to get you on the court for the rest of your living days.

 ?? Ramachandr­a Babu/©Gulf News ??
Ramachandr­a Babu/©Gulf News

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Arab Emirates