Interview ‘I hope Modi confronts vigilantes’
WITH HIS NEW BOOK OUT, RETIRED GENERAL WHO LED INDIAN ARMY OPERATION TO QUELL 2002 GUJARAT RIOTS IS PULLING NO PUNCHES
Retired LieutenantGeneral Zameer Uddin Shah, who led the Indian army in tackling the 2002 Gujarat riots, has just released his book, The Sarkari Mussalman.
More than 1,000 people, mostly from the Muslim community, were killed in the three-days riots that swept through Gujarat. This was after over 50 Hindu volunteers died in a fire on the Sabarmati Express on February 27.
The 70-year-old former deputy chief of army staff, who was dispatched to Gujarat to control the riots, has blamed the state administration for the delays in the army’s operation.
Giving insights into the situation, he writes that, when he reached Ahmedabad on the intervening night of February 28 and March 1, he found that civil vehicles and other logistical support, including police guides and maps, promised to them were not ready. Hence, the army lost crucial hours before soldiers could be deployed to control the violence.
■
Your book, The Sarkari Mussalman, has put a spotlight on the way 2002 Gujarat riots were handled by the state police administration. Please elaborate.
I have noticed the tendency of the police to take sides [in communal conflicts]. They don’t deal with the matter evenhandedly and are scared of facing large crowds. I have seen this bias not only in Gujarat, but earlier also during communal riots in Uttar Pradesh. The police need to be correct[ed], because the more you commit the army, the more the danger is of troops getting infected by communal violence.
You mention (in the book) meeting former defence minister George Fernandes and then chief minister of Gujarat Narendra Modi at the latter’s residence at 2am to assess the situation. What transpired there?
I was deployed in Rajas[than, but when I landed in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, on the midnight of February 28 and arrived at Modi’s residence, to my great relief, I found Fernandes there. Both were visibly relieved that I had come. I was assured of all logistics support at the soonest.
■
What was the reason for the delay of nearly 24 hours of logistics help to arrive for your army division to stem rioting and arson?
I reported this matter in my ‘After Action Report’, which was submitted after Operation Aman, which was meant to ensure peace in the troubled areas. I had supervised the unloading of 3,000 troops in 60
■ ■ air force flights from Jodhpur (Rajasthan) to Ahmedabad. But we kept waiting on the airfield and no logistics support came in until March 2.
Are you implying the delay was ‘intentional’?
I cannot make such an accusation, as I have no proof. I can only say it was a case of administrative failure. I do realise that impressing civil transport is a major problem. But the emergency situation should have been at par with the effort of the air force. So, we ended up wasting more than 24 hours at
■ the airfield doing nothing but waiting.
What about the report by the Special Investigative Team (SIT) appointed by the Supreme Court to probe the matter?
The SIT never consulted me. I don’t know where they got all their information. Their report was blatantly false.
■
■
So, do you support activist Teesta Setalvad, who has been saying the SIT report was a sham?
I have met her many times ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ and feel that she is a very brave woman. She was trying to stop the riots in whatever way she could. Even though from a majority community, she showed her bravery and had sympathy for humanity.
What are your views on Prime Minister Narendra Modi as a leader in handling the Gujarat riots and how has his response been after becoming the prime minister?
Whenever I asked him for anything, he never said no. In the imposition of curfew,
■ things were tardy, although I am sure he would have given instructions to the home ministry. But then a lot depends on the police. Whenever there were mobs, the police would run away saying they had been called to another troubled area, leaving the army to deal with the situation.
In early May 2014, a journalist asked me if I had apprehensions about Modi becoming the prime minister. I said, ‘I know how it was with St Thomas Becket, who was anointed the Archbishop of Canterbury by the King of England. The moment he sat on the throne, he felt his primary duty was towards the Church and not to his friends. So, my view is that anyone who is made the PM, would be like Becket. He would realise his responsibilities are towards his nation and not to a community.’ But, for these remarks, I was castigated by a lot of people, including the famous historian of Delhi’s Jawaharlal Nehru University Irfan Habib, who said I was [trying to] curry favours.
I believe, Modi has qualities of a good leader. He is honest and does not have a chain of dependents milking the system. The only problem is that he has not been able to rein in people who have taken law into their own hands, for instance: cow protectionists and love jihadis. I also hope he [confronts] people who are trying to spread communal violence.