Gulf News

Court ruling offers relief for AIADMK

HIGH COURT UPHOLDS DISQUALIFI­CATION OF 18 MLAS BY ASSEMBLY SPEAKER

-

In a major relief to the AIADMK government in Tamil Nadu, the Madras High Court yesterday upheld the state Assembly Speaker’s order disqualify­ing 18 AIADMK legislator­s last year that could pave the way for byelection­s in 20 constituen­cies, including two that fell vacant following the death of MLAs.

Justice M. Sathyanara­yanan, the third judge named by the Supreme Court after a split verdict delivered by a two-judge bench earlier, upheld Speaker P. Dhanapal’s order, saying it was done under the provisions of the anti-defection law and vacated the stay on holding by-elections to these constituen­cies.

Before reading out the operative portions of the judgement, Justice Sathyanara­yanan observed he was giving his verdict independen­tly on the basis of the arguments presented before him and was not going by the judgement given by the then Chief Justice Indrani Banerjee and Justice M. Sundar.

Dismissing all the writ petitions filed by 18 disqualifi­ed MLAs, the judge, in his 475page judgement, said the high Constituti­onal office of the Speaker is always considered as the respectabl­e position in tune with the said office and the Speaker is expected to be not only impartial but should be perceptibl­e.

“In the impugned order, the first respondent/Speaker had dealt with the preliminar­y issues and the main issues and reached the conclusion on thorough considerat­ion and appreciati­on of the materials placed before him,” he said.

“It is also a settled position of law that an order is not invalid merely because by a process of interferen­ce and if the decision of the first respondent/Speaker is a possible and plausible view, this court cannot substitute its own evaluation of the conclusion of law and facts, to arrive/ reach an altogether different conclusion,” the judgement said.

The judge said the court was not inclined to take cognizance of the subsequent events/developmen­ts as it was called upon to test the impugned order with the materials that were available before the first respondent.

“However, in the circumstan­ces of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequent­ly, connected miscellane­ous petitions for interim stay shall stand dismissed and the interim orders are vacated,” he said.

The disqualifi­ed legislator­s are with sidelined party leader T.T.V. Dhinakaran, now an independen­t legislator in the Tamil Nadu Assembly.

Reacting to the judgement, Dhinakaran told reporters: “We will discuss with the 18 legislator­s and decide on the future course of action.” He said it was “an experience for us”.

“If the 18 disqualifi­ed legislator­s decide to go on appeal against the decision then we will go for an appeal,” Dhinakaran said.

‘Good judgement’

Chief Minister Edapadi Palaniswam­y said it was a good judgement and the AIADMK was ready to face elections in these constituen­cies.

Stalin said the bypolls for the 20 assembly constituen­cies should be held immediatel­y.

In the 235-member assembly, the AIADMK has 115 members followed by the DMK with 88, Congress eight, one of the IUML, one Independen­t, the Speaker and 20 vacant seats (18 disqualifi­ed and two dead). Besides, there is a nominated member.

Three legislator­s though belonging to three different parties won their seats under the AIADMK’s two leaves symbol. Of that, one legislator Karunas is openly supporting Dhinakaran.

Speaking to reporters after the Madras High Court verdict the advocate for 18 disqualifi­ed legislator­s N. Raja Senthoor Pandian said there are three options — appeal to the Supreme Court, face bypolls or prefer an appeal and face the bypolls.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Arab Emirates