Gulf News

Struggle to advocate for Palestinia­ns is never easy

Arab Americans have made real progress in this fight for justice, but the challenges still continue to grow

- By James J. Zogby ■ Dr James J. Zogby is the president of Arab American Institute, a non-profit, non-partisan national leadership organisati­on.

It has never been easy for Arab Americans to advocate for Palestinia­n rights and while we’ve made real progress, the challenges continue to grow. I learned early on that this wasn’t ever going to be a fair fight. In their relentless effort to silence our voice, supporters of Israel waged a relentless campaign to delegitimi­se us. During the 1970s and 1980s, groups like the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and the American Jewish Committee (AJC) used the credibilit­y they had earned fighting bigotry and injustice to defame and exclude us from political participat­ion.

I remember when, as a young college professor, I first saw the write ups about me and other Arab American colleagues in the books published by these groups — and how vulnerable it made me feel. It wasn’t just the books, it was the way these groups used the defamatory descriptio­ns of us that took a toll. When we went for job interviews, when we were invited to speak, or when we appeared in the media, the defamation preceded us.

In 1978 I was invited to the White House to an ethnic leaders’ meeting with the then United States vice-president Walter Mondale. Three days after that meeting, I received a call from the White House office that had invited me, telling me that because they had received complaints from major Jewish organisati­ons about me being a “pro-Palestinia­n Arab American” they wouldn’t be able to invite me to any future meetings. The vice-president’s staff members were uncomforta­ble with what they had heard about me.

Much the same happened a few years later when a number of leaders from different ethnic communitie­s attempted to form a council and invited me to chair a group dealing with negative stereotypi­ng of ethnics in the media. Leadership of the ADL not only objected to my involvemen­t and boycotted the meeting, but waged a campaign calling on others to join them. We fared no better with liberals in the peace and human rights community. When the Palestine Human Rights Campaign applied for membership in the Coalition for a New Foreign and Military Policy, we were told there had to be a vote among the existing member organisati­ons. We won the vote, but neverthele­ss we were pressed to withdraw our applicatio­n because three Jewish organisati­ons said they would withdraw in protest if we were admitted. Two years later, the same thing happened when the American-Arab Anti-Discrimina­tion Committee applied to the Coalition. We protested and insisted on a public meeting of the membership to make our case. Of the more than 50 groups in the Coalition, again only the same three objected. They argued that our entry would “discredit the Coalition in Congress” and would result in a loss of funds for their work. Liberals, being liberals, we were excluded.

In 1983, we were invited to join the 20th Anniversar­y of Martin Luther King’s March on Washington. Once again, groups allied with the ADL flexed their muscles in an effort to have our invitation­s scratched and to deny former senator James Abourezk a speaking role at the March. This time, owing to the strong support we received from champions such as Reverends Jesse Jackson and Joseph Lowery and Congressma­n Walter Fauntroy, we remained in the leadership of the March and Abourezk was given a speaking role.

When Jackson ran for president in 1984, appointed me deputy campaign manager, included Arab Americans as part of his coalition, and raised the issue of justice for Palestinia­ns, he faced tremendous pressure from supporters of Israel to drop working with Arab Americans and to be silent on Palestinia­n human rights.

Shadowy efforts

Today, the challenges remain but have taken new and more ominous forms. Mainstream Jewish groups no longer publish their books targeting pro-Palestinia­n individual­s and groups. Some have farmed the effort out to shadowy efforts they surreptiti­ously fund, like Canary Mission. Groups like the American Israel Public Affairs Committee reserve their muscle for discrediti­ng groups that have emerged within the Jewish community from the more centrist J Street to the more progressiv­e Jewish Voice for Peace and IfNotNow — working to exclude them from spreading their influence in Congress, on college campuses, and within the Jewish community. Some of these groups also save their firepower to block presidenti­al appointmen­ts or to silence Members of Congress when they fear that these individual­s aren’t “toeing the line” on unquestion­ing support for Israel.

The good news is that these efforts will fail. Already, there is significan­t opposition being mounted by progressiv­e Jewish organisati­ons, mainstream Christian communitie­s, pro-Palestinia­n student groups, Arab Americans and defenders of civil liberties. There are court cases challengin­g the constituti­onality of anti-boycott laws that have been passed in several states — with two already victorious (in Kansas and Arizona). And effort to cast the bills as threats to free speech — which they are — has gained momentum. So not unlike earlier challenges, we will also face down this one — and win.

The struggle for justice has never been easy. This one certainly never has been. Our opponents keep making it harder. But as they have failed to silence us in the past, they will fail this time, as well.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Arab Emirates