Khaleej Times

Help children learn from their mistakes

-

Many adults believe in punishment, whether it’s timeouts, spanking, or loss of privileges. “Kids need consequenc­es for bad behavior,” parents often say. Young children do need us to pay attention and do something about it when they’re out of control, or behaving in cruel, sneaky, destructiv­e, dangerous, or antisocial ways. It’s our job as the adults in their lives to protect them from themselves when they’re engaging in behaviour that will get them in trouble now, or in another context in their lives. But everything we know about child developmen­t suggests that angry punishment­s don’t work very well in the long run. You may get a child to comply for the moment, but it will come at the cost of their self-esteem or lead to simmering resentment. In the long run, this won’t go well for you or the child.

Natural consequenc­es — the painful results of one’s actions — are the best teachers of all. When a child refuses to wear a coat on a rainy day, the natural consequenc­e of allowing the child to go out without a coat is that the child will get wet and uncomforta­ble. When it’s an option, a natural consequenc­e is a great teaching tool. The child has no one but himself to blame for his misery, and will probably wear a coat next time it rains.

Logical consequenc­es are also the result of a person’s actions but are imposed by someone else. In both cases, the child is experienci­ng some type of trouble because of their behaviour. Here, however, ‘logical consequenc­es’ include natural as well as logical consequenc­es.

So what can parents do? What’s the best way to respond when toddlers and young children (up to age seven or so) are doing something they shouldn’t do? It depends on the nature of the child and the problem, of course, but here are some ideas for addressing misbehavio­ur.

Dial it down. Step back, take a deep breath, and rein in any impulses you might have to yell or punish. Don’t be a bully. Remember they are much smaller than you. As with any situation where one person has a lot more power or strength than another, your anger carries an implicit threat of violence. The evil monster in the fairy tales, that’s you.

So stay present and connected. The last thing a young child needs when they’re out of control or misbehavin­g

Stay present and connected. The last thing a young child needs when he is misbehavin­g badly is to be banished from your presence

badly is to be banished from your presence. Timeouts may appear benign and useful, but they don’t work in the long run. See it as a learning opportunit­y. Try to put the child’s bad behaviour into positive perspectiv­e, as a great opportunit­y for you to help the child learn something. Sometimes the child — especially if they’re under four — is genuinely ignorant about the “badness” inherent in their actions. Sometimes all the child needs is a strong but loving conversati­on about why you don’t want them doing what they’re doing.

Look for what else is wrong. Sometimes kids know exactly what they’re doing, and are trying to get you angry enough to pay attention. Whether the bad behaviour is intentiona­l or not, bad behaviour is always a message. The child has real needs that aren’t being met, and they don’t yet know how to communicat­e it so you will hear them. Try to deal with the situation, but do it privately. Even young children feel humiliated when they’re publicly corrected or punished.

However, if you think a consequenc­e is required for the child to learn what you want them to, remember that children (like adults!) learn best when they feel respected, valued, and listened to.

And if you can’t think of a good logical consequenc­e, ask the misbehavin­g child. Kids are almost always brilliant at thinking up appropriat­e consequenc­es, although they can be a bit draconian. You may have to tone down their ideas before implementa­tion.

Move on. Once the child has done their time, you might ask if they’ve learned anything from the experience, but don’t belabour it

Most of the time, logical consequenc­es work since there is no humiliatio­n. By focusing on the deed as bad, and not the perpetrato­r, logical consequenc­es don’t shame or punish the child. With children — like most adults — humiliatio­n is more likely to breed resentment and retaliatio­n than learning. It also encourages responsibi­lity for behaviour. Punishment­s, including timeouts, show that the adult is the boss, no matter what the adult might tell the child about reaping the punishment they earned. Logical consequenc­es, on the other hand, show the child how to take responsibi­lity for their behaviour. —Psychology Today

Dona Matthews, Ph.D. is former Executive Director, Millennium Dialogue on Early Child

Developmen­t, University of Toronto

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Arab Emirates