SC refuses to stay its SC/ST verdict
new delhi — The Supreme Court on Tuesday said it will consider in detail the Centre’s review petition against its March 20 judgement on the SC/ST Act but declined to keep in abeyance the directions passed by it to deal with the issues of arrest and sanction under the special law.
The apex court said people who are agitating may not have read the judgement properly and must have been misled by people with vested interests. Several states were rocked by violence and clashes on Monday following a ‘Bharat Bandh’ call given by several SC/ST organisations protesting the top court’s March 20 order, that has claimed nine lives.
“We have not diluted any provision of SC/ST Act but only safeguarded the interests of the innocents from being arrested,” a bench comprising Justices A K Goel and U U Lalit asserted. It was the same bench that had passed the March 20 judgement.
During an hour long hearing, the apex court said the provisions of the SC/ST Act cannot be used to terrorise the innocents.
The bench made it clear that it would hear the Centre’s plea for a review of the earlier judgement, along with those who were original parties in the main petition, including the Maharashtra government.
The apex court has listed the Centre’s review petition after 10 days for detailed hearing and asked the Maharashtra government and others to file written submissions within two days.
During the hearing, the bench also said the law which has come under scrutiny does not mandate immediate arrest on filing of a complaint as the Act in question is a substantive law and, in the judgement, it has clearly sought its implementation in accordance with the procedural law as given in the CrPC.
The bench also clarified that there was no dilution of any provision of the SC/ST Act or Rules and said a compensation can be paid to the alleged victims of atrocities even prior to the registration of FIR under SC/ST Act.
The bench said the only offences mentioned in the SC/ST Act were the subject matter of the judgement and other cognisable offences under IPC would not require inquiry before registration of FIR. The apex court also said in the direction that it has only given the outer limit of seven days for completing the inquiry for the offences registered under the SC/ST Act. — PTI
The decision of the apex court is in interest of the society and it is the duty of the Congress and opposition that they do nothing to disturb harmony and peace in the society Giriraj Singh, Union Minister of State for Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises
Rohit Vemula is murdered. Dalits are beaten up in Una (Gujarat) but the prime minister does not speak a word on it. Atrocities on Dalits and tribals are increasing and the SC/ ST Act has been diluted. Modi prefers not to speak a word Rahul Gandhi, Congress President
Opposition parties are provoking the protesters that led to arson and deaths. We appealed to the opposition parties to take the agitation back Thaawarchand Gehlot, Union Minister for Social Justice & Empowerment 5,000 Strength of the mob which targeted politicians in Hindaun 40 Number of rioters detained for violence in the Rajasthan town 10 Number of states where normal life was thrown out of gear