The National - News

BE SELECTIVE WITH FRONTIER MARKETS BECAUSE THERE IS NO ONE SIZE FITS ALL COMMENT

▶ The ‘umbrella’ approach will not work and diversity is the key word, explains Carlos Hardenberg

- Carlos Hardenberg is the senior vice president and director of frontier markets strategies at Templeton Emerging Markets Group

Although frontier markets are a small subset of the emerging market universe, they represent an important constituen­cy that offer some compelling potential opportunit­ies.

There are a number of urban myths about frontier markets. At Franklin Templeton, we think these myths may have caused investors to overlook them in favour of developed or traditiona­l emerging-market alternativ­es.

We believe conditions are now ripe for a re-evaluation of this important niche. There are some compelling reasons why many investors might want to take another look at frontier markets today.

These can be summed up as the following: expectatio­ns for robust economic growth; continued macro developmen­t; deep discounts in valuations; low correlatio­ns

But first let’s address those urban myths about frontier markets.

The most persistent are perceived illiquidit­y, small market capitalisa­tion and poorer corporate governance standards.

Each of those accusation­s might be true if one looks just at a narrow selection of markets, but looking at the global opportunit­y of the frontier space provides a better context, in our view.

While index providers differ in what each regards as a frontier market, we don’t adhere to those definition­s or constraint­s. We view frontier markets more broadly as young or new markets in an earlier stage of economic developmen­t than larger emerging markets, generally with higher growth rates, less research coverage and a lesser degree of foreign investment.

According to our analysis, the daily turnover traded on stock exchanges in frontier markets is US$2.1 billion. So it’s more liquid than many people think.

Equally, we estimate the total market cap of frontier companies is $1.7 trillion. Because new companies are constantly coming to market, we expect that figure to continue to increase.

When it comes to concerns about corporate governance in frontier markets, we’d champion what we consider the positive influence of active management.

Looking back at the developmen­t of emerging markets in general over recent decades, the relationsh­ip between ownership and management has been an important one. We believe most of the positive change came because of the close collaborat­ion between shareholde­rs and the businesses, and the constant feedback both ways.

This is not something that can typically be achieved through a passive investing approach.

If you have a computer program directing investment decisions or an algorithm determinin­g the weighting of shares, it raises the question of who is going to interact with management and who is going to vote at shareholde­r meetings on matters of corporate governance.

We think that is particular­ly important when considerin­g frontier markets.

Let’s turn now to the reasons that we think frontier markets pose an interestin­g potential opportunit­y for investors today.

It shouldn’t come as a surprise to many investors that the 10 fastest-growing economies in the world today fall under the emerging markets banner. But what they might not have expected is that, once China and India are stripped out, the remaining eight fastest-growers are actually frontier markets.

Economic and demographi­c reasons why we believe this fast growth trend is likely to continue include a low median population age, increasing urbanisati­on in frontier markets compared with emerging and developed counterpar­ts, and low but growing per-capita income.

Our optimism about the opportunit­ies frontier markets present is underpinne­d by the evidence we have seen of a real reform agenda across many of them - in marked contrast to the developed world.

In the developed world, notably in the United States and Europe, we are seeing signs of a move towards trade restrictio­ns and isolationi­sm that we consider backward economic developmen­ts. Meanwhile, generally in frontier markets and some emerging markets, we have seen evidence of a quiet but pronounced reform effort taking place.

The trajectory of commodity prices has played a part. In the so-called boom years of 2000 to 2008 when commodity prices were doing well, there was little impetus for reform, especially in those countries that relied on commodity exports.

But when the big shock came and commodity prices corrected dramatical­ly, a lot of these countries needed to revert to considerin­g reforms to attract capital to finance developmen­t.

At the end of the day, to attract capital, countries – especially frontier markets – need to show the world they can enact reforms.

Argentina is a great example of that. After Mauricio Macri was elected as the president in December 2015 on the “Let’s Change” slogan, he implemente­d a number of reforms including lifting currency controls and settling a decade-long lawsuit that had blocked Argentina from internatio­nal capital markets.

As a result of those reforms, Argentina was again able to access the internatio­nal capital markets. In April 2016, it launched a $16.5 billion government bond.

Egypt is now going through a similar experience. It floated its currency and subsequent­ly secured a $12bn loan from the Internatio­nal Monetary Fund.

These examples show us that reform efforts can translate into economic activity.

When we talk about the attractive­ness of frontier market investing, the single most important factor for many investors tends to be valuations.

Currently, frontier market equities are trading at what we consider very cheap valuations compared with both developed and emerging market peers.

At the same time, as an asset class, frontier markets have traditiona­lly had very little correlatio­n with emerging or developed markets.

As with emerging markets in general, there may be a tendency among the uninitiate­d to lump all frontier markets under the same umbrella. We think that’s a mistake.

We believe this “umbrella” approach is even more misguided for frontier markets than for emerging markets.

To our eyes, the diversity between these countries is striking. For example, Vietnam is completely different from Ivory Coast, which in turn is different from Nigeria, which is different again from Romania.

Indeed, frontier markets are more different from each other than the emerging markets are in many ways.

That provides challenges and opportunit­ies.

But overall, our expectatio­n is that the kind of reforms we’re seeing now in frontier markets are a perfect feeding ground for improvemen­ts in turnover and size – and for more opportunit­ies for equity investors ahead in this dynamic space.

 ??  ?? The Dong Xuan market in Hanoi. As an emerging market, Vietnam offers opportunit­ies that differ from its peers Bloomberg
The Dong Xuan market in Hanoi. As an emerging market, Vietnam offers opportunit­ies that differ from its peers Bloomberg

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Arab Emirates