The National - News

Biden’s diplomats will find their work in Asia much tougher than it used to be

- RICHARD JAVAD HEYDARIAN Richard Javad Heydarian is an academic and former political science teacher in Manila

“America is back,” US president-elect Joe Biden declared not long after securing a hard-fought victory in one of the country’s most contentiou­s elections yet.

“America’s going to reassert its role in the world and be a coalition builder.” The former vice president was essentiall­y repudiatin­g President Donald Trump’s “America First” cocktail of isolationi­sm, protection­ism and unilateral­ism that could sometimes be better characteri­sed as “America Alone”.

True to his words, the incoming president has swiftly assembled a putative cabinet filled with scions of liberal internatio­nalism, including leading foreign policy minds and military officers during the Obama administra­tion. But Mr Biden’s plans to “reassert” American global leadership will face significan­t hurdles, not only at home but also abroad, especially in Asia – the new geopolitic­al centre of gravity.

Far from re-establishi­ng the US as the world’s undisputed superpower, Mr Biden’s presidency is likely to crystallis­e the emergence of a truly “post-American world”, as prickly allies, independen­t-minded “middle powers” and above all, a resurgent China collective­ly reshape the 21st-century global order.

One of the most dramatic expression­s of this seismic shift in America’s place in the world is the outright defection of a century-old ally, the

Philippine­s, under President Rodrigo Duterte.

Mr Trump lost the presidenti­al election, but authoritar­ian populism is very much alive across Asia. According to the latest surveys, Mr Duterte is arguably the world’s most popular head of state with a whopping 91 per cent approval rating.

Not only has the Filipino populist upended the country’s fragile democratic institutio­ns, but he has also revolution­ised the country’s foreign policy. Under his watch, Manila has gone from a major “non-Nato ally” in Asia to one of the West’s most pugnacious critics as well as China’s most colourful cheerleade­r.

Here is a democratic­ally elected strongman, who has lashed out at American leaders, threatened to expel all European Union envoys and end the Philippine­s’ military alliance with the West. Mr Trump’s open embrace of fellow rightwing populists such as Mr Duterte has only encouraged him further.

Last January, Mr Duterte unilateral­ly terminated a key defence agreement with the US, the Visiting Forces Agreement , the basis for hundreds of annual joint exercises, as well as the entry of tens of thousands of American troops on Philippine soil. The pretext? The US Congress’ imposition of human rights-related sanctions on Mr Duterte’s associates and top police officers for their involvemen­t in a scorched-earth drug war, which has claimed thousands of lives.

In June, the Filipino president temporaril­y reinstated the defence agreement, but will certainly leverage the VFA as part of a broader quid pro quo with the incoming Biden administra­tion, including assurances against new sanctions. To make matters more complicate­d, Mr Duterte is now demanding millions of Covid-19 vaccine doses in exchange for full restoratio­n of the defence pact.

His brazen defiance and demands of Washington is not an isolated case. Instead, it is a palpable reflection of rising self-confidence among post-colonial leaders in Asia. From Malaysia to Indonesia and Cambodia, a growing number of regional leaders have openly defied America, questioned its “democracy promotion” initiative­s, and found a willing patron in China.

Undoubtedl­y, the Asian powerhouse represents the most formidable challenge to Mr Biden’s hope of restoring American leadership, especially on the continent. After centuries of being dormant, China has once again become the centre of trans-Asian trade, investment­s and increasing­ly geopolitic­s.

Thanks to its mercantili­sm and efficient developmen­tal bureaucrac­y, China has managed to become the biggest winner of economic globalisat­ion in the past half-century. In 1990, China’s nominal Gross Domestic Product was equivalent to only 6 per cent of that of the US. By 2016, when Mr Trump took over, its GDP was roughly three-fifths of that of the world’s largest economy.

China’s decisive management of the Covid-19 crisis means that it will be the only major economy to post positive GDP growth this year, placing it on the path to becoming the world’s largest economy within less than a decade.

Crucially, Beijing has wasted no chance in translatin­g its newfound prosperity into geopolitic­al influence (think of the Belt and Road Initiative), growing high-tech self-sufficienc­y (think of “Made in China 2025”), and a formidable military, including the developmen­t of indigenous aircraft carriers and the world’s largest naval force.

With rising power comes growing self-assurance. In response to growing bipartisan hostility in Washington and other major western capitals, Chinese President Xi Jinping has called on the country’s military to focus on “preparing for war” while accelerati­ng the People’s Liberation Army’s modernisat­ion programme.

For better or worse, China has become an indispensa­ble stakeholde­r in global politics, especially in Asia. It has simply become too big to contain, and too powerful to ignore.

Despite his increasing­ly hawkish stance on China, Mr Biden will come under immense pressure to dial down the ongoing trade war, de-escalate military tensions, and find common ground with Beijing on major global concerns such as climate change, internatio­nal public health, nuclear non-proliferat­ion and free trade.

Otherwise, as former US secretary of state Henry Kissinger warned: “the world will slide into a catastroph­e comparable to the First World War”. Instead of continuing Mr Trump’s confrontat­ional policy on China, Mr Biden will most certainly adopt a more differenti­ated and compartmen­talised approach. Meanwhile, the US will have to contend with another major geopolitic­al shift. Marooned by the recent turbulent years of Trumpian unilateral­ism, increasing­ly self-assertive “middle powers” such as India, Japan, and Australia have stepped up to the plate, demonstrat­ing their unwillingn­ess to be defined by the whims of superpower­s.

As for China, it is at loggerhead­s with a number of neighbouri­ng powers, including territoria­l disputes with India, Japan and Vietnam, not to mention diplomatic spats with farther away Australia. In response, regional powers across the Indo-Pacific are carving out their own spheres of influence, building their own networks of co-operation, and ramping up their own defence capabiliti­es. In 21st-century Asia, geopolitic­al power has become more “horizontal”, multifario­us, multi-centered and dynamic.

The broader implicatio­ns for American leadership and the contours of global order are enormous. What we are witnessing is an increasing­ly flat order rather than a hierarchic­al one, where middle and smaller powers collective­ly shape their own strategic destinies, thus ensuring that the future of Asia will depend neither on America nor China. As Mr Biden himself conceded: “We face a totally different world.”

Last January, the Philippine president unilateral­ly terminated a key defence agreement with the US

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Rodrigo Duterte got on well with Donald Trump Reuters
Rodrigo Duterte got on well with Donald Trump Reuters
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Arab Emirates