Amateur Photographer

Verdict

-

TESTING the Lumix LX100 II left me with somewhat mixed feelings. On the one hand, it reminded me of just how great the LX100 design is; the chunky body feels really good in your hand, and the analog dials encourage you to take more creative control over your photograph­y. This is aided by the fast zoom lens, which provides greater scope for selective focus and background blur than those on its main rivals, the Sony RX100 V and Canon G1 X Mark III. In combinatio­n with the effective image stabilisat­ion, it also allows handheld shooting in very low light. The unique multi-aspect-ratio sensor adds further to the appeal.

However, I was also perpetuall­y reminded of the design’s failings. As a habitual viewfinder user, I find the field-sequential EVF rather less pleasant to use than those on its direct competitor­s, and the view becomes decidedly small when shooting 4:3 ratio images. Just as importantl­y, whenever a low- or high-angle shooting opportunit­y presented itself, the fixed screen hindered my efforts to take advantage. It’s really disappoint­ing not to have an articulate­d screen on a camera this large.

On a more positive note, the various updates certainly add to a better shooting experience compared to the original LX100. The extra resolution is very welcome, while the touchscree­n and extra customisat­ion options improve the usability no end. Finally, the addition of Bluetooth brings connectivi­ty right up to date. So while there’s not necessaril­y one killer feature to justify the substantia­l premium that the II commands over the original, the cumulative updates mean that it makes a decent case for itself.

As a result, the LX100 II should still appeal strongly to enthusiast photograph­ers looking for a small camera that isn’t merely a point and shoot. It’s just a shame Panasonic didn’t try that little bit harder to make it the standout leader in its class.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom