Amateur Photographer

Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

With its 20MP sensor and sel e screen, does Olympus’s entry-level OM D gain enough to stay relevant in a competitiv­e market? Andy Westlake nds out

-

OLYMPUS’S E-M10 range represents the entry-point into its OM-D line-up of SLR-styled mirrorless models, sitting between the simpler, view nderless PEN series and the higher-end, more enthusiast­focused E-M5. In the rst generation, the E-M5 and E-M10 were very similar in terms of design and features, but over time Olympus has gradually increased the differenti­ation between the two lines. In the process it’s made the E-M10 more clearly aimed at beginners, with fewer advanced features and a simpler, easier-to-use interface.

The Mark III was one of our favourite entry-level cameras, and the new Mark IV builds on it with a couple of key upgrades. Most obviously, it gains a 20MP sensor, rather than 16MP, while the screen can now ip down to face forwards beneath the camera for sel es. Other updates include an improved handgrip, faster continuous shooting, and built-in Bluetooth. On paper, this brings it more into line with other recent models at a similar price point. However in some other respects the E-M10 is more feature-rich than most of its entry-level peers, thanks to some clever Olympusexc­lusive tricks.

The elephant in the room, though, is the future of the brand. Olympus’s camera division is being split from the parent company and sold to venture capital rm Japan Industrial Partners, which inevitably brings some uncertaint­y about where the business is heading. Thankfully both sides are making all the right noises about future investment and support.

Features

As previously mentioned, the E-M10 IV is based around a new 20MP sensor, which brings it in line with the rest of the OM-D range in terms of resolution. Paired with the TruePic VIII processor, it provides a standard sensitivit­y range of ISO 200-6400 as, with extended settings of ISO 80-25,600 also on hand.

However there’s a key difference between this sensor and those in the higher-end E-M5 III and E-M1 III, because it forgoes on-chip phase detection pixels, relying on contrast detection for autofocus instead. This has little impact when you’re shooting static or slowly moving subjects, but CDAF traditiona­lly fares less well with anything fast or erratic. Olympus says that it’s deployed new AF algorithms that should make the E-M10 IV more competitiv­e in this regard.

Autofocus employs 121 points arranged across almost the entire image area. You can either allow the camera to choose the AF area itself, manually select an individual point, or use a cluster of nine, which can be easier when shooting moving subjects. However you don’t get the small AF area or larger groupings found in its more advanced siblings. The rm says that it’s also included the eye and face detection algorithms from the

agship E-M1 Mark III, that work across a wider range of angles compared to previous models.

Shutter speeds range from 60 seconds to 1/4000sec using the mechanical shutter, or as fast as 1/16,000sec when the silent electronic shutter is employed. Unlike with the Mark III, the electronic shutter can be used in the more advanced PASM exposure modes, but in standard Olympus fashion it’s confusingl­y lumped into the drive mode menu, where it’s inexplicab­ly denoted by a small heart symbol.

As tends to be the case, continuous shooting speeds depend on the shutter mode. Using the electronic shutter, you can shoot at 15 frames per second with focus xed at the start of the burst, or at 6.3fps with continuous AF; however this comes with a risk of image distortion due to rolling shutter effects. Switch to the mechanical shutter, and these speeds drop to 8.7fps, or 5fps with AFC. If you expect to be shooting bursts regularly, it’s worth getting a fast UHS-II type SD card: using one, I found I could rattle off at least 27 frames at top speed in raw and JPEG before the camera slowed down. Switch down to a lower shooting speed, and the camera will keep going almost inde nitely.

One of Olympus’s key technologi­es is its 5-axis in-body image stabilisat­ion, which works with practicall­y any lens you can use, aside perhaps from very long telephotos. The E-M10 IV’s implementa­tion isn’t as powerful as those on its higher-end siblings, but it still promises 4.5 stops bene t when shooting handheld. This allows you to keep your ISO setting down in low light, thereby offsetting the noise disadvanta­ge of the smaller sensor, or use slow shutter speeds handheld for creative motion-blur effects.

Switch the mode dial away from the PASM quartet and you’ll nd that the E-M10 IV is also packed full of creative options. The auto mode comes with a

touchscree­n interface that gives a results-orientated approach to changing camera settings, for those who haven’t yet learned the effects of settings such as shutter speed, aperture and white balance. There’s also an array of scene modes designed to allow beginners to tailor the camera to speci c subjects, handily laid out in an attractive touch-based interface. Olympus’s Art Filters provide a wide range of image-processing looks, and are suf ciently tasteful that I’d actually consider using them, which isn’t always the case with other brands.

Select the AP, or Advanced Photograph­y mode, and you’ll nd another interestin­g set of options, several of which are unique to Olympus. Live Time allows you to watch long exposures develop in real time, taking the guesswork out of what is often an unpredicta­ble process, while Live Composite allows you to build up light trails without overexposi­ng the background. Keystone Compensati­on enables in-camera correction of converging verticals, previewed live onscreen. You also get panoramic, multi-exposure and silent modes to play with.

Turning our attention to video, the camera can record 4K video at 30fps, or Full HD at up to 60fps. Olympus’s in-body image stabilisat­ion does a good job of keeping handheld footage steady, and can be supplement­ed by additional electronic stabilisat­ion, at the expense of a slight

eld-of-view crop. It’s worth bearing in mind, though, that unlike the majority of its peers, there’s no microphone socket for higher-quality sound.

For smartphone connectivi­ty, Olympus has added Bluetooth as well as Wi-Fi. This simpli es the initial setup in the Olympus Image Share App, and in principle enables you to connect to the camera to browse through your image les even when it’s switched off and stored away in a bag. You also get two forms of remote release, one basic and the other with live view and extensive remote control of camera settings. However it’s worth noting that there’s no other form of remote release.

Build and handling

Olympus’s OM-D range is designed to pay homage to the

rm’s considerab­le lm heritage, with an attractive retro design that resembles its old 35mm lm SLRs. This latest model looks almost exactly the same as its predecesso­r, just with ‘IV’ picked out in silver on the front of its body. All of the buttons and dials are in the same places, and have the same labels and functions. The result is a charismati­c, tactile little camera.

While the rst two E-M10s employed metal body shells, the Mark IV follows its predecesso­r in being mostly constructe­d of plastic; indeed at 383g, it’s even lighter. This might disappoint users of those older models who’d like to upgrade to the 20MP sensor, but it’s no different from its clearest rivals such as the Canon EOS M50, Fuji lm XT-200, Nikon Z 50, Panasonic Lumix G100 or Sony Alpha 6100. Coupled with the retractabl­e 14-42mm kit zoom, it’s extremely compact and portable.

One signi cant change that won’t appear in any spec-sheetbased comparison is the redesigned grip, which has a more sculpted pro le that provides extra space for your fourth and little ngers to wrap around. This has a surprising­ly positive effect on the camera’s handling, and combined with the prominent thumb hook it makes the Mark IV really comfortabl­e to carry one-handed, which can’t always be said for cameras this small. It also makes the camera unusually secure when it’s held in sel e mode.

Thanks to a good array of external controls, including twin control dials under your fore nger and thumb, the Mark IV handles unusually well for its class. Everything falls sensibly to hand, and the most important settings generally have their own control. For everything else, pressing a button on the camera’s left shoulder brings up onscreen

control panels that are tailored for each exposure mode, and which can mostly (if not always) be operated intuitivel­y by touch.

To set the focus area, you’re expected to use the touchscree­n, even when you’re shooting through the view nder. I’m not usually a big fan of this approach, but I nd it works well on the E-M10 IV. Alternativ­ely you can press the left key to activate focus area selection, and then use the d-pad.

Another change Olympus has made compared to older E-M10 models is to simplify the menus, stripping out many of the more obscure settings and signi cantly reducing the available level of customisat­ion. You can re-assign the top-plate buttons that are given over to autofocus/ autoexposu­re lock, video recording and the 2x digital zoom, but only from a small list of options. I set the latter to engage magni ed view, to aid with achieving precise focus. Like most other cameras at this level, there’s no facility to save custom camera setups for quick recall.

One drawback relative to the best of its peers lies with the touchscree­n interface. While this supports the most important functions such as selecting the focus area and browsing images in playback, you can’t use it to work through the menus, or change options using the onscreen control panels in the PASM modes. In this respect, it feels like a half- nished job.

View nder and screen

When it comes to composing your images, the Mark IV employs essentiall­y the same hardware as its predecesso­rs. Its 2.36m-dot electronic view nder provides 0.62x magni cation, which is pretty much standard at this price point. It previews colour and white balance, along with image brightness across a range covering -3 to +2 stops. Depth of

eld can be previewed, if you require, by assigning it to a top-plate button. There’s plenty of status informatio­n available, along with handy shooting aids such as a dual-axis electronic level and live histogram.

One major change, though, comes with the redesign of the rear screen, which can now be ipped down 180° to face forwards beneath the camera for sel es. This has long been a staple of the lm’s simpler PEN cameras, so it’s a surprise Olympus has taken so long to add it to the E-M10 line. When the screen is in this position the camera engages a sel e assist mode, with onscreen shutter, video and exposure

compensati­on buttons, and the option to engage a three-shot self-timer. It’s a well-thought-out system that works very nicely. However the fold-down screen isn’t such a great design for those interested in vlogging, as it gets blocked if you place the camera on a tripod.

Autofocus

Unlike most of its peers, the E-M10 IV is solely reliant on contrast detection for autofocus. While some might have you believe that this makes the camera unusable, the reality is that it only really matters when you’re shooting fast-moving subjects. The rest of the time, its autofocus is easily up to the task. Indeed with static subjects it’ll focus accurately in the blink of an eye, no matter where in the frame your subject may be.

When the camera is confronted with a moving subject, the continuous AF works quite well, in practice. I found that when shooting relatively predictabl­e subjects such as oncoming vehicles, the camera had no trouble maintainin­g focus while shooting at 5fps. Its hit-rate was rather lower with the more erratic motion of wildlife, but with persistenc­e you should still be able to get usable images.

One trade-off for using contrast detection is that the view nder blackout time between frames during bursts is noticeably longer compared to PDAF-equipped cameras, which hinders following moving subjects. As usual for Olympus, you have to remember to select the low shooting speeds to get continuous AF, along with live view between frames. Select high-speed shooting instead and only the rst frame is likely to be in focus – if that.

Face- and eye-detection has become an increasing­ly important selling point for cameras, and it works pretty well on the E-M10 IV. It’s capable of understand­ing faces across a broad range of angles, from front-on to nearpro le, and at a good range of distances. Again it can handle relatively gentle subject movement with no problem, but it’s not going to be the best option for shooting energetic, erratic children.

Performanc­e

In practical use, the E-M10 IV is a well-behaved, responsive camera that’s a joy to use. With the 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 EZ kit zoom, it takes a second or so to set itself for shooting when you ick the power on, but much of this is down to the lens extending into position. With other lenses, it’s ready to go almost immediatel­y. During use it responds instantly to both the physical controls and the touchscree­n.

The camera’s automated systems work very well. Olympus has historical­ly done a great job with metering, auto white balance and colour rendition, and they all come together again here to give consistent­ly attractive JPEG output. It’s also easy to judge in the view nder when you might want to lighten or darken an image for aesthetic effect, and apply the requisite level of exposure compensati­on.

While it has to be understood that the Four Thirds sensor doesn’t give as good raw image quality compared to APS-C competitor­s, the 20MP resolution is still more than enough for an A3+ print. At low ISO settings you can pull two or three stops of detail from the shadows when processing raw les, and while you’ll see higher levels of noise at any given ISO compared to its APS-C peers, I’d still be perfectly happy shooting at sensitivit­ies as high as ISO 6400.

As usual, Olympus’s in-body stabilisat­ion works extremely well, and you’ll rarely nd that an image has been spoiled by camera shake. Unsurprisi­ngly it doesn’t hit the heights achieved by its more expensive siblings, the E-M5 III and E-M1 III, but I was able to get consistent­ly sharp images at shutter speeds down to about 0.8 seconds using the kit zoom towards the middle of its range. As a result, I was able to keep shooting at ISO 200 well after dusk, when I’d have had to start boosting the sensitivit­y on most other cameras.

Olympus’s 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 EZ kit lens is a decent performer, giving sharp images across its full zoom range, along with decent close-up performanc­e. Its slimline design – just 23mm thin when retracted – also makes it a great match to the camera’s design ethos. Its zoom response is unusually well judged for an electronic design too, enabling precise compositio­n with little fuss. However its 28-85mm equivalent range is uninspirin­g compared to the 24mm wideangles now provided by most other brands.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Metering and auto white balance are consistent­ly well judged Olympus 9-18mm f/4-5.6 at 18mm, 1/1600sec at f/5.6, ISO 200
Metering and auto white balance are consistent­ly well judged Olympus 9-18mm f/4-5.6 at 18mm, 1/1600sec at f/5.6, ISO 200
 ??  ?? In-body stabilisat­ion is very effective, allowing the use of low ISOs handheld in low light Olympus 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 at 30mm, 0.8sec at f/5.1, ISO 200,
Instant Camera Art Filter
In-body stabilisat­ion is very effective, allowing the use of low ISOs handheld in low light Olympus 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 at 30mm, 0.8sec at f/5.1, ISO 200, Instant Camera Art Filter
 ??  ?? The E-M10 IV’s JPEG output gives really attractive colours
Olympus 40-150mm f/4-5.6 at 150mm, 1/800sec at f/5.6, ISO 200
The E-M10 IV’s JPEG output gives really attractive colours Olympus 40-150mm f/4-5.6 at 150mm, 1/800sec at f/5.6, ISO 200
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? In-camera Keystone Compensati­on was used to correct converging verticals Olympus 9-18mm f/4-5.6 at 18mm, 1/640sec at f/5.6, ISO 200
In-camera Keystone Compensati­on was used to correct converging verticals Olympus 9-18mm f/4-5.6 at 18mm, 1/640sec at f/5.6, ISO 200
 ??  ?? Continuous AF isn’t the E-M10 IV’s strongest point, but it’s still possible to get some decent wildlife shots Panasonic 100-300mm f/4-5.6 at 108mm, 1/1000sec at f/4.5, ISO 800
Continuous AF isn’t the E-M10 IV’s strongest point, but it’s still possible to get some decent wildlife shots Panasonic 100-300mm f/4-5.6 at 108mm, 1/1000sec at f/4.5, ISO 800

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom