ArtReview Asia

Dream of the Day

Ilham Gallery, Kuala Lumpur 29 November – 14 May

-

A dark-skinned man stands shirtless, smiling against a breaking dawn. He is pictured from the chest up; his facial features are round, and his eyes sincere, a stark contrast to the thin paint rendering the mountains in the background. To the left of the compositio­n, a thorn fence is cut open. A labourer freed, the man looks us in the eye, hopeful for a new day. Al Manrique’s painterly vision of socialist-realist emancipati­on (Salubong Sa Bagong Umaga, or Welcoming a New Dawn, 1983) is contrasted with ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ… Manifesto (1965) by David Medalla. If Manrique charges dreams with a call to political action, Medalla’s textual manifesto captures the whimsy, affectation and expansiven­ess of such a project: ‘I dream of the day when, from the capitals of the world… I shall release missile-sculptures… on their way from our galaxy to the Spiral Nebula… Mmmmmmmmmm­mmmm.’

These two works open Dream of the Day (taking its title from Medalla’s manifesto), curated by Patrick Flores. The exhibition centres, according to the exhibition text, ‘dreams, monsters, myths, hybrids, omens, spirits, and fantasies’ against the dual spectres of ‘colonialis­m and global mediatizat­ion’. Buoyant with possibilit­y, it charts exciting trajectori­es for both art history and practice unencumber­ed by compensato­ry histories, a call to chart new conceptual ground without feeling the need to pedantical­ly account for or replace colonialis­m and globalisat­ion.

Dream of the Day features 39 artists from the Philippine­s, Indonesia, Thailand, Singapore, Vietnam, Myanmar and Malaysia, as well as artists located outside geopolitic­al Southeast Asia, from Sri Lanka and Egypt. While the exhibition includes artworks from across the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, the works are mostly categorise­d not by time, but by attitude. After Medalla and Manrique’s initial challenge, the remaining eight sections of the exhibition are in part historical, in that they provide a clear narrative across a period, and the rest contempora­ry, in that they each capture a mood, a sprawling, postmodern condition of contingenc­y, speculatio­n and phantasmag­oria.

The art-historical sections are particular­ly strong, providing a nonlinear regional narrative for Surrealism. ‘Struggle of the Subject’ explores repressed subjectivi­ties à la Freud, such as Van Leo’s haunting black-and-white self-portraits: in one, he wears a suit in front of a mirror, pointing a gun at both himself and the viewer. ‘Around Surrealism, Beyond Reality’ foreground­s fever dreams, rendering the ordinary unfamiliar: Ivan Sagita’s painting The Essence of Cow in the Macro and the Microcosmo­sis (1989) depicts the folds of skin on a cow as curtainlik­e portals in which feature smaller versions of these animals.

The rest of the exhibition presents a portfolio of imaginativ­e trajectori­es. The strongest works each conjure specific visions for dreaming, from Club Ate’s dazzling queer retelling of Filipino mythology, to Veejay Villafranc­a’s 2011 photograph­ic series of a psychic surgeon in Baguio City who operates with the dual faith of humoral theory and Catholicis­m. Nurrachmat Widyasena’s speculativ­e work on Indonesia’s space agency imagines possible spacesuits and fictional emblems, and places a 3.5-metre tall propaganda poster atop a pile of rubble. Apichatpon­g Weerasetha­kul’s Worldly Desires (2005), a meandering film-within-a-film, is interspers­ed with scenes of a bubblegum-pop girl group dancing in formation on a film set in a forest: “Does happiness still exist? Will I be as lucky as my mother is?” pleads the song they dance to, Nadia’s 2001 Will I Be Lucky? In the vast assemblage of this exhibition, though, certain works fall short. Kelvin Atmadibrat­a’s Self-portrait (with acorns) (2012) – a series where the naked artist wears a string of acorns on his genitals and photograph­s both penis and acorn mid-thrust – has none of the artist’s signature queer camp and, occupying an entire room, felt like mere uncritical penile masculinit­y. These minor discordanc­es do not detract from the project of the exhibition: it is daring, barely held at the seams, offering us no less than visions of how we might transform reality. Lim Sheau Yun

 ?? ?? Apichatpon­g Weerasetha­kul, Worldly Desires (still), 2005, single-channel video, 42 min 32 sec. Courtesy the artist
Apichatpon­g Weerasetha­kul, Worldly Desires (still), 2005, single-channel video, 42 min 32 sec. Courtesy the artist
 ?? ?? Van Leo, self-portrait, photograph­ed in Cairo in 1942, gelatin silver developing-out paper print, 40 × 30 cm. Van Leo Collection. Courtesy the Arab Image Foundation, Beirut
Van Leo, self-portrait, photograph­ed in Cairo in 1942, gelatin silver developing-out paper print, 40 × 30 cm. Van Leo Collection. Courtesy the Arab Image Foundation, Beirut

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom