Auto Express

2nd Nissan Leaf

Second place for Nissan is no failure, it just shows how quickly the EV market is moving

-

THE second-generation Leaf is a heavily updated version of the original when it comes to the architectu­re on which it’s based. The big changes come courtesy of a bigger 40kWh battery (of which around 36kWh is usable) supplying a more powerful 148bhp electric motor.

Unlike the MG though, the Leaf ’s battery doesn’t feature more advanced liquid cooling to regulate the cells’ temperatur­e in use and when charging. Bear in mind that over a long period of time this could potentiall­y affect the battery’s performanc­e.

As it stands, the Leaf ’s performanc­e is sound, taking 7.8 seconds to accelerate from 0-60mph – much faster than an equivalent combustion­engined car would take. Like the MG, it’s so easy to do as well. With a single-speed transmissi­on there are no changes, so accelerati­on is smooth.

Also like the MG, the Leaf isn’t the greatest to drive. The connection between driver and steering is vague, compounded by the fact the steering wheel doesn’t offer a wide enough range of adjustment; there’s only the option to change rake, not reach.

Neither are the body control or ride anything to write home about. The Leaf has less variance between its best and worst, smothering harsh bumps much more adeptly than the occasional­ly crashy MG, but it doesn’t feel quite as soft and forgiving as the ZS at its best. However, the Leaf is much more consistent and composed, partly because its ride height is lower, so it doesn’t roll around as much.

The motor is smoother and its response is silkier, so it’s easier to get the measure of, even if the Leaf ’s performanc­e lagged behind the ZS’s in our tests. Along with the 0-60mph assessment, the Nissan trailed the MG by 0.1 and 0. 2 seconds between 30-50mph and 50-70mph, at 2.8 and 4.6 seconds.

This is barely noticeable on the road though. However, the ZS’s liquid cooling means the MG’s performanc­e and recharging rate should be more consistent than the Nissan’s, while the battery itself should have a longer life.

Like the MG, quality is average at best, with the Leaf ’s cabin clothed in hard plastics, while there’s plenty of equipment included even in base Acenta spec. You get a much more versatile seven-inch screen next to the speedo, which shows more EV-specific info than the MG’s small screen. The Nissan’s infotainme­nt shows charging stations, too, whereas the MG shows petrol stations – it’s obvious it’s been carried over from the standard ZS.

The Leaf also comes with great safety tech, a rear-view camera, 16-inch alloys, adaptive cruise, climate control and auto headlights.

DRIVING

Calibratio­n is a big part of any EV, and the Leaf feels just a little smoother, while the electric motor seems better integrated into the package. Nissan’s experience with building EVs is definitely on show here.

e-PEDAL Regenerati­ve braking isn’t as tuneable as in the MG. Nissan’s e-Pedal is either on or off, but regen is strong enough to bring the car to a stop. It’s well calibrated, and the brakes respond better than in the MG.

RUNNING COSTS

You won’t have to pay any road tax (VED) because these EVs come in for the zero rate. Allied to their superbly cheap energy costs, then this pairing is difficult to fault if you’re after affordable EV motoring.

BiK EVs pay 16 per cent company car tax, so lowerrate earners will pay £974 and £1,006 a year to run the ZS EV and Leaf respective­ly. This drops to nothing for the next tax year, before rising one percentage point per year.

PRACTICALI­TY

Leaf is more limited for space. Head and legroom are tighter in the rear. The MG’s panoramic roof also means the cabin feels lighter; the Nissan’s small rear windows and lower roofline don’t help in this respect.

CHARGING Leaf uses a 50kW CHAdeMO rapid charge feed that takes one hour for an 80 per cent top-up. Despite its bigger battery, MG claims 40 minutes for the same 80 per cent recharge using a CCS 50kW DC rapid charge. Acenta trim features a 3.6kW on-board charger, which means 13 hours for a full recharge. The MG’s 7kW on-board charger means a recharge time of 6.5 hours using an AC Type 2 plug.

INTERIOR & TECHNOLOGY

THE Leaf is flawed ergonomica­lly. You sit too high and the steering wheel doesn’t adjust for reach. The driving position isn’t as nice or as adjustable as in the ZS EV.

INFOTAINME­NT The Leaf’s multimedia tech isn’t all that sophistica­ted, either. The eight-inch screen’s graphics are lower-res, and nav isn’t included, but Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are, so you can connect your phone for directions.

OWNERSHIP

As standard the Leaf gets emergency braking with pedestrian recognitio­n, lane-departure and blindspot warning, cross-traffic alert and lane-keep assist. The car scored five Euro NCAP stars. ProPilot You can add ProPilot (£595) for semi-autonomous cruise control to keep you in your lane on the motorway. It’s not very smooth, but is a nice convenienc­e feature.

 ??  ?? score 4.1
score 4.1
 ??  ?? score 3.7
score 3.7
 ??  ?? score 3.8
score 3.8
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Interior
Go for a Leaf Acenta, and you don’t get as much kit as the similarly priced MG. The car in our pictures is in well-specced Tekna trim Switches
Stubby drive selector sits next to e-Pedal button for one-pedal driving Quality
Leaf feels like the betterbuil­t product, but isn’t as far ahead as you might expect
Interior Go for a Leaf Acenta, and you don’t get as much kit as the similarly priced MG. The car in our pictures is in well-specced Tekna trim Switches Stubby drive selector sits next to e-Pedal button for one-pedal driving Quality Leaf feels like the betterbuil­t product, but isn’t as far ahead as you might expect
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom