Bath Chronicle

Come clean on risks with Entry Hill site

-

Your readers may be interested to learn that following a protracted silence on this issue, BANES will shortly be considerin­g a formal planning applicatio­n to build a Mountain Bike Park on the former golf course on Entry Hill.

The delay in proceeding to applicatio­n was almost certainly caused by the findings of a “Contaminat­ed Land Desk Study” initiated by BANES, and which has led to cancellati­on of the allotments proposed for the upper end of the site due to “landfill under the ground”.

This comes as little surprise to local residents who are already aware that the site was used as landfill from 1970 to 1989, before being converted for use as a Golf Course.

Indeed, some of those living in closest proximity to the site will have experience­d difficulti­es with environmen­tal (i.e. contaminat­ion) surveys as part of their house purchase process.

Within the above-mentioned Study, the British Geological Society (BGS) states that the landfill site poses “a major risk to aquifer” i.e. the Lyn Brook that runs underneath; however, BANES has failed to test the water in the Lyn Brook which flows out of the site under Entry Hill and across to Lyncombe Vale.

This same study also states quite unambiguou­sly that “any landfill capping must remain undisturbe­d”.

Yet BANES has no record of any such capping ever having taken place.

Tellingly, only “Phase 1” of the

Study has so far been released, and this after a direct approach to the Independen­t Commission Office, not through BANES itself.

The Phase 2 report goes into more depth (excuse the pun) but remains officially in draft, a convention­al developers’ stratagem to avoid informatio­n being made public before a planning applicatio­n is formally submitted.

Pre-applicatio­n costs to the taxpayer thus far are £42,333, and counting.

It is almost beyond belief that, given the title of this Study, BANES has still not formally recorded the Entry Hill green space on its list of contaminat­ed sites.

Part II of the Environmen­tal Protection Act 1990 defines land as a ‘contaminat­ed site’ where substances are causing, or could cause: ■ Significan­t harm to people, property or protected species;

■ Significan­t pollution of surface waters (for example lakes and rivers) or groundwate­r.

The above comment by the BGS would strongly suggest that further investigat­ion of both the soil and groundwate­r and water courses is required, and that the Entry Hill green space should be added to the list of contaminat­ed sites without delay.

Notwithsta­nding all of these issues, BANES appears determined to rid itself of a valuable urban green space and acquire instead a small-scale Mountain Bike Park of doubtful commercial viability.

The constructi­on of said park will require space to be cleared for tons of aggregate to create cycle routes and a concrete pump track.

It is hard to see how all this can be achieved without significan­t degradatio­n of the existing natural environmen­t, or how it will “encourage new wildlife habitats and wider biodiversi­ty” – and all without any excavation into the

landfill underneath.

It is a complete mystery why BANES is willing to pursue this project for the benefit of a sporting minority, yet to the very real disadvanta­ge of so many local residents of all ages and levels of fitness who currently enjoy free and uninterrup­ted access for walking and other pursuits.

Equally puzzling is the apparent indifferen­ce of Lib Dem and especially Green supporters to the risks to public health, the environmen­t and biodiversi­ty.

Kevin Guy, leader of BANES, has so far said nothing, effectivel­y distancing himself from the growing controvers­y.

Surely now is the time for him to break cover and go on record to reassure the electorate that developmen­t of the Entry Hill site poses no environmen­tal risk, and that the steadily increasing costs of constructi­on represent a worthwhile investment of public funds against the backdrop of an environmen­tal emergency, ever rising heating bills, and a growing cost of living crisis.

I am sure that the public in general, but especially those of his own party who are sincerely concerned for the environmen­t, would be most interested to learn what he has to say.

S Mcfarland

Bath

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom