Bath Chronicle

Housing approved despite eco worries

- John Wimperis john.wimperis@reachplc.com

Councillor­s have granted planning permission for 70 new homes on a field beside Keynsham nature reserve “through gritted teeth”.

These are the words from one councillor, after the developer made improvemen­ts to the scheme’s impact on biodiversi­ty and transport.

The plans had attracted 265 objections and only two supporting comments. It was originally sent back to developer Taylor Wimpey by Bath and North East Somerset Council’s planning committee over concerns about biodiversi­ty.

However, revised plans addressing these concerns were submitted and Cllr Duncan Hounsell warned the committee they could face an expensive appeal if they rejected them without “rock solid” reasons.

He said: “Planning is not decided by the number of objections or the number of people in support. It has to be judged on planning policy and emerging planning policy.”

The houses will be built on a field between the Manor Road Community Woodland nature reserve and Minsmere Road.

Thirty per cent of the houses will be affordable and, following revisions made by Taylor Wimpey’s consultant­s, the site will also feature beebricks, insect hotels, and 40 bat boxes, as well as informatio­n boards about ecology in the Manor Road nature reserve.

Developmen­ts in Bath and North East Somerset must show they will lead to an overall increase in biodiversi­ty before receiving planning permission.

The developers had originally proposed fulfilling this requiremen­t by investing in biodiversi­ty in a nearby location which, although permitted under the rules, did not satisfy councillor­s.

Despite the additional biodiversi­ty

measures on site, most of the developmen­t’s biodiversi­ty gain will take place on the separate site. The planning committee voted to approve the plans although some councillor­s voiced their reluctance.

Westfield councillor Dr Eleanor Jackson said: “I am going to vote for it through gritted teeth because [...] I am not entirely convinced about the biodiversi­ty net gain and the way that’s going to be accomplish­ed.”

Hal Mcfie, councillor for Keynsham East, voted against the plans as he was unconvince­d about the amount of green space on the site and felt that the biodiversi­ty gain should be on the site of the main developmen­t.

He said: “When you make a developmen­t we actually don’t want the diversity to go down. We want the diversity that you’ve got, that you are living among, to be almost the same as it was before. Now that quite clearly isn’t going to be true here.”

He added: “I must say that I do not feel happy with the current intensity of building and I believe that we will all in time look at these [biodiversi­ty net gain] indexes with a bit of knowledge and we will use them to try and reduce overdevelo­pment.”

Midsomer Norton’s Shaun Hughes agreed, adding that developers often saw the need for biodiversi­ty net gain as an afterthoug­ht.

He said: “The problem with moving it down the road is that it benefits neither the existing residents at this location or the future residents.”

The developers will also invest £2.3m in the local area, including £130,000 on improvemen­ts to the Manor Road nature reserve and a £1.5m investment into public transport and liveable neighbourh­oods.

Council officers believe these transport measures will reduce road usage by more than it would be increased by the additional traffic from the housing developmen­t.

 ?? Google ?? The field between Minsmere Road and Manor Road Community Woodland
Google The field between Minsmere Road and Manor Road Community Woodland

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom