BBC History Magazine

The Statute of Westminste­r, a cornerston­e of the Commonweal­th

- BY ASHLEY JACKSON #0& ANDREW STEWART

What was the Statute of Westminste­r, and when was it enshrined?

The Statute of Westminste­r was a key moment in the journey of Britain’s dominions towards independen­ce. It passed through parliament in December 1931 – 90 years ago this month – enshrining in law the 1926 Balfour Declaratio­n’s recognitio­n that Australia, Canada, the Irish Free State, Newfoundla­nd, New Zealand and South Africa were equal, not subordinat­e, to Britain, freely associatin­g as members of a “Commonweal­th of Nations”.

The statute removed Westminste­r’s right to legislate for the dominions, thereby establishi­ng their legislativ­e independen­ce. They could now legislate beyond as well as within their own borders, join the League of Nations (except Newfoundla­nd), conclude treaties with other states, declare war on their own behalf and develop diplomatic representa­tion abroad. New Zealand was the last to ratify the statute, in 1947.

What impact did it have on Britain’s relations with the dominions?

In the short term, not much of one; in many ways, there was a hollowness to the document, and it was more about status than substance. The dominions were not yet independen­t, and were still reliant on Britain for trade, investment and security. The statute was a clever expression of the relationsh­ip between Britain and the fully self-governing units of the empire, acknowledg­ing their mature stature but not removing the establishe­d links.

Over the longer term, however, these ties loosened. The statute provided the dominions with the legal apparatus necessary to develop their own nationhood and pursue their own regional and internatio­nal agendas. Britain could no longer automatica­lly speak on their behalf in the councils of the world – and this created fault lines at the heart of the empire. Although (with the exception of Ireland, which left the Commonweal­th in 1949) the dominions’ outlook tended towards them operating as a unit, they were free to make their own way in the world.

Why should we remember the Statute of Westminste­r today?

As Britain’s power contracted in the mid-20th century, the dominions took advantage of the freedoms the statute granted them. As such, it provided the basis for their full independen­ce.

What’s more, in expressing the idea of an associatio­n of politicall­y equal states, the statute was a cornerston­e of the modern Commonweal­th. Britain originally hoped to exercise leadership through the Commonweal­th but, as former colonies gained independen­ce and became members, it evolved into a genuinely free and equal associatio­n of nations. With 54 members, it is today one of the world’s most prominent inter-state organisati­ons, its purpose “to promote prosperity, democracy and peace, amplify the voice of small states, and protect the environmen­t”.

 ?? ?? # 5GEQPF 9QTNF 9CT RQUVGT UJQYU $TKVKUJ GORKTG OKNKVCT[ RGTUQPPGN 6JG 5VCVWVG QH 9GUVOKPUVG­T YCU RCTV QH VJG NQPI RTQEGUU QH FKUOCPVNKP­I VJG GORKTG
# 5GEQPF 9QTNF 9CT RQUVGT UJQYU $TKVKUJ GORKTG OKNKVCT[ RGTUQPPGN 6JG 5VCVWVG QH 9GUVOKPUVG­T YCU RCTV QH VJG NQPI RTQEGUU QH FKUOCPVNKP­I VJG GORKTG
 ?? ?? Ashley Jackson (left) is professor of imperial and military history at King’s College, London. Andrew Stewart is professor of war studies at the Australian National University
Ashley Jackson (left) is professor of imperial and military history at King’s College, London. Andrew Stewart is professor of war studies at the Australian National University

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom