Verdict

The Suzuki is a fluffy commuter, efficient town bike, but too small and lacks incisors – it feels like a 125. The Kawasaki has presence and pace, rides well, but while its frantic nature is fun for ten minutes it’s tiresome after two weeks. And though the Benelli is a good distance tool and great value, it’s missing a little balance and refinement. BMW’S G310GS is very good. Pleasingly chunky, brisk, it’s dynamically fine and has the right badge. But it’s not GS enough. Remove the branding and it could be anything – there’s no defining GS character. So it’s between the Honda and Royal Enfield. They’re genuine; bikes that happen to be small, not little bikes trying to be big. The CRF’S off-road bias may be off-putting, yet it’s a fine commuter, would be a hoot on trails, and ideal for a few weeks lost down Highland lanes (looks ace with gubbins strapped to the back). Meanwhile the distinct Himalayan’s laid-back motor and quality ride give time to soak up surroundings while it easily turns its hand to anything, from county-hopping weekend thrums to jostling urban errands… and it’s cheap. Buying with my heart, it’s the classy and pretty Honda. But if I was after an effective tool, something different yet reassuringly usable, it’s the Royal Enfield.

‘They’re genuine – bikes that happen to be small, and not little bikes trying to be big’