Bird ID Photo Guides

Basic Principles

-

Flycatcher­s are a delightful component of autumn passerine ‘falls’. Three species – Spotted, Pied and Red-breasted – occur regularly on British coasts, but each also has a much rarer and rather similar counterpar­t species. Here we’ll look at the identifica­tion of our three familiar species and compare them with Asian Brown, Collared and Taiga Flycatcher­s respective­ly.

Spotted and Asian Brown Flycatcher­s

Spotted Flycatcher breeds from western Europe in the west to southern Siberia and Mongolia in the east, the whole population wintering in sub-Saharan Africa.

Although a fast-declining breeding bird in Britain, it can also be found as an autumn migrant from the Continent, particular­ly on eastern coasts. It is a relatively early autumn migrant, with passage typically peaking in late August and September.

This is a large flycatcher, strikingly lean, long tailed and long winged. Its plumage is a characteri­stic mousey grey-brown, softly marked with blurry vertical streaking on the breast and at the throat-sides, and with some streaking also in the forehead and crown. First-winter birds show some pale fringing and tipping in the tertials and greater coverts.

Asian Brown Flycatcher breeds across Siberia east to Sakhalin and Japan and winters in South-East Asia. It is an extreme rarity in Britain with only four records to date, all on the east coast – one in July and the others in September and October.

Asian Brown is plain and brown and so Spotted Flycatcher is the main confusion species, but in reality the difference­s are many. Asian Brown is a very small flycatcher, compact and short tailed. Its head is large looking and its eye also looks big. From below, the bill base is strikingly broad, almost ‘boat shaped’, and, unlike Spotted Flycatcher, extensivel­y orange on the lower mandible.

In terms of plumage, it is a uniform pale brown, unstreaked with almost no distinguis­hing features, although there is a diffuse brownish wash across the breast and a first-winter bird would show some pale fringing and tipping in the tertials and greater coverts. Most striking perhaps are the pale lores and large, staring eye with a prominent eyering.

Pied and Collared Flycatcher­s

Pied Flycatcher breeds from Iberia in the west to western Siberia in the east and winters in west Africa. It is a common breeder in parts of western Britain, but on the east coast it is perhaps best known as the quintessen­tial Continenta­l migrant. It is also an early migrant, peaking in August, but still occurring in September.

This is a distinctiv­e and easy-to-identify species. Its autumn plumage is a relatively plain mousey-brown, but the closed wing is dark with white on the tertial and wing covert edges (and often in the primary bases, too); it has a dark tail with prominent white outer feathers. A close view will reveal diffuse washes at the throat sides.

This is a difficult species to miss as it can be both highly active, performing a characteri­stic single wingflick, and noisy, giving a nervous and quite loud whit whit.

Its sibling species – Collared Flycatcher – breeds through much of central and eastern Europe and parts of western Russia. It is very rare in Britain, with just 46 records to date, almost all of which are in spring. Only three have been found in autumn.

Although spring adult males are striking, in autumn this species pair presents one of the classic and most difficult identifica­tion problems. In reality, most will be verging on unidentifi­able in the field.

The only useful feature concerns the shape and extent of the white patch at the primary bases: lacking or very restricted in Pied and not approachin­g the leading edge of the wing, but longer and more ‘club shaped’ in Collared, extending beyond the tips of the primary coverts and almost to the wing edge. Other plumage features are only visible in the hand, and DNA analysis might also be useful. The call might be helpful, however: in Collared this is a soft, highpitche­d heeep.

Red-breasted and Taiga Flycatcher­s

Red-breasted Flycatcher breeds in eastern Europe and western Russia and migrates south-east to the Indian subcontine­nt for winter. In autumn it is a regular though still very scarce migrant in Britain, mainly on the east coast.

This is a truly tiny and often very active flycatcher. It has a distinctiv­e habit of cocking its rather long tail, producing a somewhat Wren-like silhouette.

Its plumage is warm brown above – with no white in the wing – and a warm buff or peachy colour below. The most striking feature is its tail pattern: this is blackish with prominent white panels at the base, very obvious in flight. This species can be noisy too, giving a very distinctiv­e soft, Wren-like rattle: trrrrk.

Its eastern counterpar­t – Taiga Flycatcher – is very similar; indeed until relatively recently it was regarded as a subspecies of Red-breasted. Taiga Flycatcher breeds across Siberia and winters in South-East

Asia. It is an extreme rarity in Britain, with only three records to date: one in April, one from September into October and one in October.

This species is challengin­g to identify, but tends to be a colder, greyer colour than Red-breasted, particular­ly on the underparts, which lack warm, peachy hues.

The tertials differ, too, being more prominentl­y pale f ringed, and the bill averages darker than Redbreaste­d Flycatcher.

The key feature, however, is the colour of the uppertail coverts: brown or near-black in Redbreaste­d (never blacker than the central tail feathers), but a deep glossy black (blacker than the central tail feathers) in Taiga. Calls are useful, too. Taiga Flycatcher gives a rattling call like Red-breasted, but this is drier, faster and harsher.

 ?? ?? THREE: Spotted Flycatcher (Alexandra Park, London, 31 August 2009). The diffuse streaking on the breast, flanks, forehead and crown are plain to see here and readily identify this bird as a Spotted Flycatcher. Note again the small-looking eye and lack of obvious pale lores, while the bill also appears completely dark, lacking extensive orange in the lower mandible, further separating it from Asian Brown.
THREE: Spotted Flycatcher (Alexandra Park, London, 31 August 2009). The diffuse streaking on the breast, flanks, forehead and crown are plain to see here and readily identify this bird as a Spotted Flycatcher. Note again the small-looking eye and lack of obvious pale lores, while the bill also appears completely dark, lacking extensive orange in the lower mandible, further separating it from Asian Brown.
 ?? ?? TWO: Spotted Flycatcher (Spurn, East Yorkshire, 29 September 2007). This Spotted Flycatcher is typically long and sleek with very long wings and a relatively long tail, longer than that of Brown Flycatcher. The blurry streaking on the breast and flanks and also on the forehead and crown are diagnostic of Spotted Flycatcher. Note also the lack of prominent pale lores, the relatively smalllooki­ng eye and the wholly dark-looking bill. The obvious pale tips to the wing coverts indicate that this is a fresh first-winter bird.
TWO: Spotted Flycatcher (Spurn, East Yorkshire, 29 September 2007). This Spotted Flycatcher is typically long and sleek with very long wings and a relatively long tail, longer than that of Brown Flycatcher. The blurry streaking on the breast and flanks and also on the forehead and crown are diagnostic of Spotted Flycatcher. Note also the lack of prominent pale lores, the relatively smalllooki­ng eye and the wholly dark-looking bill. The obvious pale tips to the wing coverts indicate that this is a fresh first-winter bird.
 ?? ?? FOUR: Asian Brown Flycatcher (Ömnögovi, Mongolia, 30 May 2014). This mousey-brown bird might at first sight be taken for a Spotted Flycatcher, but the underparts are completely plain, lacking any blurry streaking on the breast and flanks, and the forehead and crown are completely plain, too. As well as its striking uniformity, note the apparently small size and the compact, short-tailed proportion­s with a relatively large-looking head and eye and a stout, broad-based bill with extensive orange in the lower mandible. Also obvious are a prominent eyering and a large pale triangular area on the lores.
FOUR: Asian Brown Flycatcher (Ömnögovi, Mongolia, 30 May 2014). This mousey-brown bird might at first sight be taken for a Spotted Flycatcher, but the underparts are completely plain, lacking any blurry streaking on the breast and flanks, and the forehead and crown are completely plain, too. As well as its striking uniformity, note the apparently small size and the compact, short-tailed proportion­s with a relatively large-looking head and eye and a stout, broad-based bill with extensive orange in the lower mandible. Also obvious are a prominent eyering and a large pale triangular area on the lores.
 ?? ?? SIX: Pied Flycatcher (Algarve, Portugal, 6 September 2007). The prominent white edges to the tertials and white tips to the wing coverts readily identify this bird as a Pied Flycatcher. Note also the contrastin­gly dark tail with white outer tail feathers. In life, migrant Pied Flycatcher­s can be noisy – giving a loud whit – and also perform a distinctiv­e nervous wing flicking.
SIX: Pied Flycatcher (Algarve, Portugal, 6 September 2007). The prominent white edges to the tertials and white tips to the wing coverts readily identify this bird as a Pied Flycatcher. Note also the contrastin­gly dark tail with white outer tail feathers. In life, migrant Pied Flycatcher­s can be noisy – giving a loud whit – and also perform a distinctiv­e nervous wing flicking.
 ?? ?? SEVEN: Pied Flycatcher (Wells, Norfolk, 19 September 2016). This head-on flycatcher presents few clues and could at first sight be one of several species discussed here. However, the plain underparts, forehead and crown eliminate Spotted Flycatcher, while the lack of prominent pale lores and weak eyering suggest Pied Flycatcher. The malar ‘smudge’ is also typical of this species. Further views of the upperparts should show the characteri­stic white wing markings.
SEVEN: Pied Flycatcher (Wells, Norfolk, 19 September 2016). This head-on flycatcher presents few clues and could at first sight be one of several species discussed here. However, the plain underparts, forehead and crown eliminate Spotted Flycatcher, while the lack of prominent pale lores and weak eyering suggest Pied Flycatcher. The malar ‘smudge’ is also typical of this species. Further views of the upperparts should show the characteri­stic white wing markings.
 ?? ?? FIVE: Asian Brown Flycatcher (Flamboroug­h, East Yorkshire, 4 October 2007). There are few features visible in this head-on shot and this bird could at first glance be one of several flycatcher­s. However, overall it appears very plain and greyish-brown, and the very largelooki­ng eye, prominent eyering and extensivel­y and contrastin­gly pale lores should immediatel­y grab the attention. Further views should then reveal the complete suite of Asian Brown Flycatcher characters.
FIVE: Asian Brown Flycatcher (Flamboroug­h, East Yorkshire, 4 October 2007). There are few features visible in this head-on shot and this bird could at first glance be one of several flycatcher­s. However, overall it appears very plain and greyish-brown, and the very largelooki­ng eye, prominent eyering and extensivel­y and contrastin­gly pale lores should immediatel­y grab the attention. Further views should then reveal the complete suite of Asian Brown Flycatcher characters.
 ?? ?? EIGHT: Collared Flycatcher (Heligoland, Germany, 27 September 2008). This bird closely resembles a Pied Flycatcher. The white tertial edges and covert tips and dark tail with white outer tail feathers are all typical of that species. However, the patch at the base of the primaries is relatively large and ‘club shaped’, extending down beyond the tips of the primary coverts and forward towards the leading edge of the wing. A very small white patch at the primary bases is shown by many Pied Flycatcher­s, but the one on this bird is beyond the range of
Pied and is a key pointer to Collared Flycatcher.
EIGHT: Collared Flycatcher (Heligoland, Germany, 27 September 2008). This bird closely resembles a Pied Flycatcher. The white tertial edges and covert tips and dark tail with white outer tail feathers are all typical of that species. However, the patch at the base of the primaries is relatively large and ‘club shaped’, extending down beyond the tips of the primary coverts and forward towards the leading edge of the wing. A very small white patch at the primary bases is shown by many Pied Flycatcher­s, but the one on this bird is beyond the range of Pied and is a key pointer to Collared Flycatcher.
 ?? ?? NINE: Collared Flycatcher (Sumburgh Head, Shetland, 21 September 2015). Most autumn Collared Flycatcher­s resemble the bird in the previous image, but adult males can, as here, be much more striking. Note the continued presence of a large white forehead patch, larger than that of Pied, and massive amounts of white in the tertials and wing coverts and, most importantl­y, in the primary bases. The white here is so extensive, resembling that of several shrike species, that this bird can only be a Collared Flycatcher.
NINE: Collared Flycatcher (Sumburgh Head, Shetland, 21 September 2015). Most autumn Collared Flycatcher­s resemble the bird in the previous image, but adult males can, as here, be much more striking. Note the continued presence of a large white forehead patch, larger than that of Pied, and massive amounts of white in the tertials and wing coverts and, most importantl­y, in the primary bases. The white here is so extensive, resembling that of several shrike species, that this bird can only be a Collared Flycatcher.
 ?? ?? TEN: Red-breasted Flycatcher (Heligoland, Germany, 8 October 2005). This mousey-brown flycatcher lacks white in the wing, so cannot be a Pied or Collared Flycatcher, and its uniformity eliminates Spotted Flycatcher. Its small size and compact proportion­s recall Asian Brown, but note the lack of a prominent pale triangular loral patch. The white ‘panels’ in the tail are just visible here and readily identify this as a Red-breasted Flycatcher. The cocked tail is also characteri­stic of this species.
TEN: Red-breasted Flycatcher (Heligoland, Germany, 8 October 2005). This mousey-brown flycatcher lacks white in the wing, so cannot be a Pied or Collared Flycatcher, and its uniformity eliminates Spotted Flycatcher. Its small size and compact proportion­s recall Asian Brown, but note the lack of a prominent pale triangular loral patch. The white ‘panels’ in the tail are just visible here and readily identify this as a Red-breasted Flycatcher. The cocked tail is also characteri­stic of this species.
 ?? ?? THIRTEEN: Taiga Flycatcher (Fetlar, Shetland, 27 September 2009). The same bird as in photo 12, at its original site when first identified. With its compact proportion­s and dark tail with white side ‘panels’, this bird closely resembles a Redbreaste­d Flycatcher. However, it is a rather
‘cold’ grey-brown above and white below and there are no peachy hues in the throat or breast. This should set alarm bells ringing as these are key features of Taiga Flycatcher. The identity of this bird as a Taiga is best confirmed by reference to the uppertail coverts – solidly jet black and darker than the uppertail.
THIRTEEN: Taiga Flycatcher (Fetlar, Shetland, 27 September 2009). The same bird as in photo 12, at its original site when first identified. With its compact proportion­s and dark tail with white side ‘panels’, this bird closely resembles a Redbreaste­d Flycatcher. However, it is a rather ‘cold’ grey-brown above and white below and there are no peachy hues in the throat or breast. This should set alarm bells ringing as these are key features of Taiga Flycatcher. The identity of this bird as a Taiga is best confirmed by reference to the uppertail coverts – solidly jet black and darker than the uppertail.
 ?? ?? ELEVEN: Red-breasted Flycatcher (Cunningsbu­rgh, Mainland Shetland, 27 September 2014). Head-on flycatcher­s can be tricky and this bird could at first sight be taken for a Pied Flycatcher. However, the rich peachy hues in the throat and breast and the lack of a subtle malar ‘smudge’ identify this as a Redbreaste­d Flycatcher. In life, the plain wings and white tail ‘panels’ would rapidly become apparent, as would a persistent tail-cocking habit and a Wren-like ‘rattling’ call.
ELEVEN: Red-breasted Flycatcher (Cunningsbu­rgh, Mainland Shetland, 27 September 2014). Head-on flycatcher­s can be tricky and this bird could at first sight be taken for a Pied Flycatcher. However, the rich peachy hues in the throat and breast and the lack of a subtle malar ‘smudge’ identify this as a Redbreaste­d Flycatcher. In life, the plain wings and white tail ‘panels’ would rapidly become apparent, as would a persistent tail-cocking habit and a Wren-like ‘rattling’ call.
 ?? ?? TWELVE: Taiga Flycatcher (Yell, Shetland, 18 October 2009). With its white tail ‘panels’, this bird closely resembles a Red-breasted Flycatcher. However, most Red-breasted Flycatcher­s are quite a warm brown and many show peachy hues in the throat and breast. By contrast, this bird looks strikingly ‘cold’ – greybrown above and whitish below. This appearance is a strong pointer towards Taiga Flycatcher, but to confirm its identity we need to look at the uppertail coverts. Here they are reassuring­ly solid black, slightly blacker even than the tail itself.
TWELVE: Taiga Flycatcher (Yell, Shetland, 18 October 2009). With its white tail ‘panels’, this bird closely resembles a Red-breasted Flycatcher. However, most Red-breasted Flycatcher­s are quite a warm brown and many show peachy hues in the throat and breast. By contrast, this bird looks strikingly ‘cold’ – greybrown above and whitish below. This appearance is a strong pointer towards Taiga Flycatcher, but to confirm its identity we need to look at the uppertail coverts. Here they are reassuring­ly solid black, slightly blacker even than the tail itself.
 ?? ?? FOURTEEN: Red-breasted Flycatcher (Spurn, East Yorkshire, 25 September 2008). Autumn adult male Red-breasted Flycatcher­s retain their orange throat, which suffuses softly into the upper breast. Also visible on this bird are the ‘warm’ brown plumage hues, half-cocked tail and white tail ‘panels’. Note that the uppertail coverts, although blackish, are not fully jet black and are not blacker than the tail.
FOURTEEN: Red-breasted Flycatcher (Spurn, East Yorkshire, 25 September 2008). Autumn adult male Red-breasted Flycatcher­s retain their orange throat, which suffuses softly into the upper breast. Also visible on this bird are the ‘warm’ brown plumage hues, half-cocked tail and white tail ‘panels’. Note that the uppertail coverts, although blackish, are not fully jet black and are not blacker than the tail.
 ?? ?? FIFTEEN: Taiga Flycatcher (Flamboroug­h Head, East Yorkshire, 26 April 2003). This Taiga Flycatcher was Britain’s first. Note the ‘cold’ hues in the upperparts and very white-looking underparts. Most striking, however, is the sharply defined orange throat patch encircled by a solid band of ash-grey at the throat-sides and upper breast. The pale tips to the greater coverts identify this as a second-calendar-year bird; this is a further pointer to Taiga Flycatcher. Male Taigas acquire an orange throat in their second year, while male Red-breasted Flycatcher­s don’t do so until their third.
FIFTEEN: Taiga Flycatcher (Flamboroug­h Head, East Yorkshire, 26 April 2003). This Taiga Flycatcher was Britain’s first. Note the ‘cold’ hues in the upperparts and very white-looking underparts. Most striking, however, is the sharply defined orange throat patch encircled by a solid band of ash-grey at the throat-sides and upper breast. The pale tips to the greater coverts identify this as a second-calendar-year bird; this is a further pointer to Taiga Flycatcher. Male Taigas acquire an orange throat in their second year, while male Red-breasted Flycatcher­s don’t do so until their third.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom