Birmingham Post

Employers need to look again at group life assurance

-

55 per cent. The Lifetime Allowance was once as high as £1.8 million but is now just £1 million, increasing to £1.03 million in April 2018.

And while death-in-service benefits provided through a registered pension scheme have always formed part of the Lifetime Allowance, given most firms offer around four times your salary it has become a risk factor for more people now that the allowance has fallen.

This has left thousands of middle managers and others vulnerable to being sucked into the tax net.

A mainstream example concerns someone earning £100,000 with death-in-service benefits worth four times their salary.

If they die before retirement, the £400,000 payment would count towards their Lifetime Allowance, leaving a tax-free limit of just £630,000 after April 2018. Their heirs would pay tax on any benefit above the Lifetime Allowance.

So the chances of breaching the limit are real for many people – arguably another case of the law of unintended consequenc­es coming into play.

This applies too with so-called ‘protection’.

Ongoing guidance by the Pensions Advisory Service states: “When the Lifetime Allowance was introduced in 2006 and in subsequent years when it has been reduced following pension reforms, those with benefits valued in excess of the Lifetime Allowance have been able to apply for ‘protection’ to protect the value of benefits they have built up (and future benefits that may accrue) from tax charges.”

However, if ‘protection’ is in place on an individual’s pension portfolio, being in a ‘registered’ group life assurance scheme can result in this being lost – for example if the person moves jobs and gets a new death-inservice benefits package viewed by the tax authoritie­s as an addition to their pension fund.

Thankfully there are a number of ways to be more tax efficient in ensuring the death benefits left to your loved ones are not subject to unnecessar­y tax.

One is through taking up death-inservice benefits via an ‘excepted group life policy’.

Or you could ask your employer to help you fund a stand-alone life insurance policy rather than offering death-in-service benefits.

The advantage in providing life assurance cover under an ‘excepted’ scheme or a ‘single life relevant policy’ rather than under a ‘registered’ scheme is that the death benefit from these types of plans is not a reportable event to HMRC so do not count towards the Lifetime Allowance.

Single life relevant plans can also run alongside a ‘registered’ scheme sharing the same unit rate per £1,000 of cover and could have a free cover limit where no underwriti­ng is required. It could also result in the premium being lower than if an individual policy is set up.

It is vital that employers and indeed employees take advice on the best way forward. Employee benefit perks help attract quality staff and it is important to retain them.

No one wants to pay more tax than is strictly necessary. Trevor Law is managing director of Eastcote Wealth Management, chartered financial planners, based in Solihull. Email: tlaw@eastcotewe­alth.co.uk The views expressed in this article should not be construed as financial advice

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom