£690m cuts in a decade – and another £85m to go

Council wants right to impose bigger tax hikes

BIRMINGHAM City Council has demanded the power to impose even bigger council tax increases.

It told MPs it should be free to set its own council tax rise, instead of being restricted by the Government.

It also asked for freedom to increase charges for social care, and to hold a consultation about “additional levies” for employers.

A council spokesman said the authority was asking for more flexibility, but this did not mean it would necessarily put up charges even if it was allowed to do so.

They said: “It does not follow that such flexibility would be used, but having local discretion linked to local accountability would allow choice to be exercised when appropriate.”

As things stand, the Government will only allow local councils to impose an increase each year of 2.99 per cent. Any authority hoping to charge more has to hold a referendum of local voters – which effectively makes a higher increase impossible, given the cost of holding a public vote and the slim chances of winning.

But in a submission to the House of Commons Housing, Local Government and Communities Committee, the city council said: “In terms of improvement, Government can allow local authorities additional

LIKE other authorities across the country, Birmingham has been forced to make massive cuts as a result of reductions in the grant from central government.

Apart from cutting spending, the only method it has of balancing the books is to attempt to raise more money locally.

Savings of more than £690m have been made across services since 2010 and the council has plans to deliver further savings of £85 million by 2022/23, taking the total annual savings to £775 million.

Highlighting the cuts being made in the current financial year of 2019-20, Birmingham said it was reducing spending by:

Arts and cultural activities: £4.3m

Waste services: £5.0m Libraries: £2.8m

Parks, sports and leisure

freedoms in terms of setting it council tax increases in absolute as well as percentage terms.”

An absolute increase would mean simply setting the increase as a cash sum, rather than a percentage.

The authority continued: “Council tax increases are effectively capped services: £7.8m

Neighbourhood and Community services: £1.5m

Early years provision: £2.6m The inquiry by MPs warned that councils nationwide are at breaking point.

A report by the Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee warned that the social care system is on the verge of collapse while transport, culture, housing and planning spending has been slashed by more than 40 per cent since 2010.

The MPs said: “Local government has coped with a prolonged period of real-terms spending reduction which is without parallel in modern times. This large fall in local authorities’ resources has been primarily caused by very significant cuts in central government grants.”

by the Government through the referendum policy.

“Whilst it is recognised that the funding burdens for local authorities cannot simply be shifted to the local residents, Birmingham still contends that any increase in council tax should solely be a local decision.”

Making the increase solely a local decision would mean ending the 2.99 per cent limit currently imposed by central government.

This year the council tax charge for a Band D home directly imposed by the city council rose from £1,315.22 to £1,380.85. This included an increase of £39, representing the 2.99 per cent increase on the basic council tax bill, plus another £16 specifically to pay for social care.

It is unclear whether the Government will allow councils to continue increasing the social care levy in future years.

In its submission to MPs, the council also said it should be free to increase fees for adult social care and for planning and licensing applications.

The authority said: “Some further flexibilities in terms of fees and charging may be useful, although it is recognised that a Council, particularly one like Birmingham with high deprivation levels, will never be able to solve its financial challenges simply through increased fees.”

The authority also asked for the ability to impose “additional levies” on employers, hotels and Birmingham Airport.

“Opportunities to introduce additional levies, once accepted by local residents, should also be given consideration in order to fund specific projects in a particular area, for example airport levies, tourism taxes, supplementary business rates, etc.”